<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does a chat in church  erode U.S. principles?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/01/does-a-chat-in-church-erode-us-principles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/01/does-a-chat-in-church-erode-us-principles/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: P.R.E.Z.</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/01/does-a-chat-in-church-erode-us-principles/comment-page-1/#comment-95594</link>
		<dc:creator>P.R.E.Z.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=11349#comment-95594</guid>
		<description>You know, it&#039;s funny since I just did a post going back to what the context of that statement, &quot;separation of church and state&quot; meant. 

I&#039;m not familiar with Kathleen Parker and I don&#039;t care in this case. She&#039;s wrong. A careful look at history, text, and context reveals the details of what Jefferson meant when he said that to the Danbury Baptists.

That aside, this has nothing to do with church and state coming together except in the interest of free speech and open forum. So if she&#039;s against anything, it appears as if she&#039;s against that which, of course, would be bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, it&#8217;s funny since I just did a post going back to what the context of that statement, &#8220;separation of church and state&#8221; meant. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not familiar with Kathleen Parker and I don&#8217;t care in this case. She&#8217;s wrong. A careful look at history, text, and context reveals the details of what Jefferson meant when he said that to the Danbury Baptists.</p>
<p>That aside, this has nothing to do with church and state coming together except in the interest of free speech and open forum. So if she&#8217;s against anything, it appears as if she&#8217;s against that which, of course, would be bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Meaker</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/09/01/does-a-chat-in-church-erode-us-principles/comment-page-1/#comment-95534</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Meaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 17:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=11349#comment-95534</guid>
		<description>At the time that the Constitution and the first 10 Amendments were ratified, there were established churches for several states, notably the Congregationalist church in Rhode Island and Providence Plantations. 

As time went on, these state churches lost their official status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the time that the Constitution and the first 10 Amendments were ratified, there were established churches for several states, notably the Congregationalist church in Rhode Island and Providence Plantations. </p>
<p>As time went on, these state churches lost their official status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

