<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACLU Targets Effective Police Work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/07/24/aclu-targets-effective-police-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/07/24/aclu-targets-effective-police-work/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Molby</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/07/24/aclu-targets-effective-police-work/comment-page-1/#comment-92428</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Molby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=9215#comment-92428</guid>
		<description>Did you read the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080720/NEWS01/807200371&amp;referrer=FRONTPAGECAROUSEL&amp;template=printart&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;source article&lt;/a&gt;? Like usual, it&#039;s not as simple as the ACRU would like you to believe.
&lt;blockquote&gt;Robert Justin Lipkin, a law professor at Widener University, said the constitutionality of the jump-out squads comes down to whether police are conducting advance surveillance or whether they&#039;re just saying that and descending on corners at random.

&quot;Are they really gathering intelligence and differentiating between the good citizen coming home from getting a quart of milk, or is it just a charade and they&#039;re patting down anyone they want?&quot; he said. &quot;If they&#039;re doing good police work, the practice will be upheld. But to just go to an open-air drug market en masse and check out everyone who&#039;s there is not something they&#039;re entitled to do.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

P.S. File it under Fourth Amendment, not First.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you read the <a href="http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080720/NEWS01/807200371&amp;referrer=FRONTPAGECAROUSEL&amp;template=printart" rel="nofollow">source article</a>? Like usual, it&#8217;s not as simple as the ACRU would like you to believe.</p>
<blockquote><p>Robert Justin Lipkin, a law professor at Widener University, said the constitutionality of the jump-out squads comes down to whether police are conducting advance surveillance or whether they&#8217;re just saying that and descending on corners at random.</p>
<p>&#8220;Are they really gathering intelligence and differentiating between the good citizen coming home from getting a quart of milk, or is it just a charade and they&#8217;re patting down anyone they want?&#8221; he said. &#8220;If they&#8217;re doing good police work, the practice will be upheld. But to just go to an open-air drug market en masse and check out everyone who&#8217;s there is not something they&#8217;re entitled to do.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>P.S. File it under Fourth Amendment, not First.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

