Louisiana Governor Jindal Vows to Amend State Law to Maintain Death as a Penalty for Child Rape

Posted on June 25, 2008

I am glad to know there are still some politicians willing to stand up to the tyrants in black robes!

I am outraged by the Supreme Court’s decision. It is an affront to the people of Louisiana and the jury’s unanimous decision in this case. ? ?“The opinion reflects a clear abuse of judicial authority, trampling the constitutional authority of states to act through the legislative process. The Court found, ‘there is a distinction between intentional first degree murder on the one hand and nonhomicide crimes against individual persons, even including child rape, on the other. The latter crimes may be devastating in their harm, as here, but in terms of moral depravity and of the injury to the person and to the public, they cannot be compared to murder in their severity and irrevocability.’

“The Supreme Court is dead wrong.? ?“It is fundamentally improper for the Supreme Court to base an important decision like this on its ‘independent judgment’ about a perceived ‘national consensus against capital punishment for the crime of child rape.’ The opinion reads more like an out-of-control legislative debate than a constitutional analysis.?

?“One thing is clear: the five members of the Court who issued the opinion do not share the same ‘standards of decency’ as the people of Louisiana. One Justice said that ‘the death penalty is not a proportional punishment for the rape of a child.’ That is incredibly absurd. The most repugnant crimes deserve the harshest penalties, and nothing is more repugnant than the brutal rape of an eight-year-old child. ? ?“We will evaluate ways to amend our statute to maintain death as a penalty for this horrific crime.”

» Filed Under 1st Amendment, Activist Judges, News, Supreme Court

Trackback URL

Comments

2 Responses to “Louisiana Governor Jindal Vows to Amend State Law to Maintain Death as a Penalty for Child Rape”

regularron on June 26th, 2008 2:40 am

Instead of complaing and wanting to “impeach” a judge, here’s a question we should be askeding.

Do we really need a Surpreme Court? Let’s be honest here. As “Conservatives”, we (a minority of us, atleadt) believe in States Rights and the 10th Amnendment. So why do we need a Surpreme Court?

Let’s impeach them all, and replace them, with none. I know “radical” idea, but it isn’t so far fetched.
Rosemary on June 26th, 2008 6:36 am

Great post, Jay. Thanks for sharing it. I’ll have something up in a little while. Have a good day.