Cnadians and brits don’t like it. After so many years, it’s hard to break it, especially that the government has all the power.

I say something is bad when it is proven that it doesn’t work anywhere. Our system is not perfect, but it’s the best out there.

Let me ask you something. Seriously.

Socialized medicine works well for Canada and Britain. Don’t believe it? ASK THEM SOME TIME.

Here’s my question for you.

Why does something have to totally suck if we don’t have it here in the U.S?

We don’t have a German language speaking majority. Does that mean that German is bad? No.

We don’t have Socialized medicine. IT CANNOT WORK HERE ANYWAY. WE SHOULD NOT ADOPT IT. But why do you act like it has to suck just because we don’t have it here in the U.S? They have it ‘over there.’ They like it. It works for them. There are reasons it cannot work here, the first being one called “Insurance companies.”

Your own beloved government publishes statistics about the number of uninsured Americans. There are quite a few — the data is available from the census website. All taken, the data show that our system is not automatically better because it’s private payer. We have one system, England has another. That’s where it ends. Saying something is bad because we don’t have it here makes the Republican cognoscenti like myself just point and laugh at the material on your site and head back to mises.org.