<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Unions Kill Trade Agreement &#8211; Real Improvement Unrewarded</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/05/06/unions-kill-trade-agreement-real-improvement-unrewarded/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/05/06/unions-kill-trade-agreement-real-improvement-unrewarded/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:54:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nick</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/05/06/unions-kill-trade-agreement-real-improvement-unrewarded/comment-page-1/#comment-85747</link>
		<dc:creator>nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoptheaclu.com/?p=8470#comment-85747</guid>
		<description>The Dems have pointed to several reasons for wanting to delay the vote on the FTA, not only humans rights violations.  However, accepting your argument that the humans rights issue is only a cover, do you not think that the Dem&#039;s hesitancy may have more to do with the known downsides of these FTAs?  For all the successes that FTAs represent for some, they also represent disaster for others.  I will not go into detail because my only point for leaving this reply was to chastise you for over-simplifying the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dems have pointed to several reasons for wanting to delay the vote on the FTA, not only humans rights violations.  However, accepting your argument that the humans rights issue is only a cover, do you not think that the Dem&#8217;s hesitancy may have more to do with the known downsides of these FTAs?  For all the successes that FTAs represent for some, they also represent disaster for others.  I will not go into detail because my only point for leaving this reply was to chastise you for over-simplifying the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

