<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fuss About Hillary Clinton&#8217;s New Ad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:24:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Teach</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-77042</link>
		<dc:creator>William Teach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/#comment-77042</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s easy for Obamessiah to say he would have voted against Operation Iraqi Freedom, since he was not there, and had no access to the intelligence that the rest of the Congress critters had.

And, yes, Regular Ron, it is a fearmongering ad. That happens during elections. Always has, always will. But, what else is Clinton to do? Obama has almost no record, and is willing to sit down with long time USA enemies with no preconditions. He doesn&#039;t say he will have the State Dept sit down with them, he says HE will do it.

But the commercial is also realistic, and as tony points out, a fair question. Who do you trust? Some political neophyte hooked to the farthest of the far left kook progressives, who are for surrender in Iraq, can find nothing nice to say about the USA, and have a Blame America First mentality, or Hillary, who at least has some sort of clue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s easy for Obamessiah to say he would have voted against Operation Iraqi Freedom, since he was not there, and had no access to the intelligence that the rest of the Congress critters had.</p>
<p>And, yes, Regular Ron, it is a fearmongering ad. That happens during elections. Always has, always will. But, what else is Clinton to do? Obama has almost no record, and is willing to sit down with long time USA enemies with no preconditions. He doesn&#8217;t say he will have the State Dept sit down with them, he says HE will do it.</p>
<p>But the commercial is also realistic, and as tony points out, a fair question. Who do you trust? Some political neophyte hooked to the farthest of the far left kook progressives, who are for surrender in Iraq, can find nothing nice to say about the USA, and have a Blame America First mentality, or Hillary, who at least has some sort of clue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crat3</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-77022</link>
		<dc:creator>crat3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 08:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/#comment-77022</guid>
		<description>Cult leader Obama&#039;s ad is no response to Hillary Clinton&#039;s legitimate ad.  Cult leader Obama&#039;s ad is slamming and disparaging the military that is serving Iraq.  Instead of hitting at Sen. Clinton with his misrepresentation on her about the Iraq war, he is bashing the patriotic military that is serving in Iraq.

Cult leader Obama cannot be commander in chief when he is skewering the military in Iraq with his attacks on Sen. Clinton.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cult leader Obama&#8217;s ad is no response to Hillary Clinton&#8217;s legitimate ad.  Cult leader Obama&#8217;s ad is slamming and disparaging the military that is serving Iraq.  Instead of hitting at Sen. Clinton with his misrepresentation on her about the Iraq war, he is bashing the patriotic military that is serving in Iraq.</p>
<p>Cult leader Obama cannot be commander in chief when he is skewering the military in Iraq with his attacks on Sen. Clinton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tonynoboloney</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-76919</link>
		<dc:creator>tonynoboloney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 23:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/#comment-76919</guid>
		<description>I think its a fair question to ask.  It IS up to the American people to decide &quot;who will answer the phone&quot;.  Imagine if the answer would have been Algore in 2000. Imagine if the answer is BHO or Hillary in 2008, its not fear mongering, its a genuine nightmare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its a fair question to ask.  It IS up to the American people to decide &#8220;who will answer the phone&#8221;.  Imagine if the answer would have been Algore in 2000. Imagine if the answer is BHO or Hillary in 2008, its not fear mongering, its a genuine nightmare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-76912</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/#comment-76912</guid>
		<description>Jay, no [edited]!! I just say that even The New Republic titled their piece on this &quot;Hillary Cuts an Ad ... for McCain&quot;

McCain needs to use this ad for himself... honestly, despite my problems with McCain, when this particular question is asked and I look at the three choices that will presumably be given, Obama, Clinton or McCain... that answer is so easy.

McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay, no [edited]!! I just say that even The New Republic titled their piece on this &#8220;Hillary Cuts an Ad &#8230; for McCain&#8221;</p>
<p>McCain needs to use this ad for himself&#8230; honestly, despite my problems with McCain, when this particular question is asked and I look at the three choices that will presumably be given, Obama, Clinton or McCain&#8230; that answer is so easy.</p>
<p>McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-76902</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 22:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/#comment-76902</guid>
		<description>My my, wasn&#039;t it nice of Hillary to cut an ad for John McCain?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My my, wasn&#8217;t it nice of Hillary to cut an ad for John McCain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-76866</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/#comment-76866</guid>
		<description>First off what happens on MY blog is separate than what happens here....secondly, anyone that refers to our soldiers as &quot;killers&quot;,(I saved the comment) IS disparaging them.

YOU I will not speak to again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off what happens on MY blog is separate than what happens here&#8230;.secondly, anyone that refers to our soldiers as &#8220;killers&#8221;,(I saved the comment) IS disparaging them.</p>
<p>YOU I will not speak to again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RegularRon</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/comment-page-1/#comment-76863</link>
		<dc:creator>RegularRon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/02/29/fuss-about-hillary-clintons-new-ad/#comment-76863</guid>
		<description>Well it is a fearmongering ad. It&#039;s moronic to be honest.Would have loved to seen the meeting of the minds when they came up with it.Can only imagine what was said.

&quot;Hey, let&#039;s make the American public submit to the fear of something happening half way across the world. And make it like, America has to be the Police Officer of the world.&quot;

Oh, I forgot we already are. It&#039;s ridiculous to say the least. My motto for this election...Don&#039;t Vote. It only Encourages them.

And Spree,I was dispargening our troops. Are you that closed minded, to any kind of critism, you shut down the debate?? That&#039;s what Socialists do. I know most Neo-Con&#039;s are socialists, but I thought you were a little bit better. I am sorry, I tried to engage you in a debate. And I will not be returning to you blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it is a fearmongering ad. It&#8217;s moronic to be honest.Would have loved to seen the meeting of the minds when they came up with it.Can only imagine what was said.</p>
<p>&#8220;Hey, let&#8217;s make the American public submit to the fear of something happening half way across the world. And make it like, America has to be the Police Officer of the world.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, I forgot we already are. It&#8217;s ridiculous to say the least. My motto for this election&#8230;Don&#8217;t Vote. It only Encourages them.</p>
<p>And Spree,I was dispargening our troops. Are you that closed minded, to any kind of critism, you shut down the debate?? That&#8217;s what Socialists do. I know most Neo-Con&#8217;s are socialists, but I thought you were a little bit better. I am sorry, I tried to engage you in a debate. And I will not be returning to you blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
