Comments on: The Conservative Case For Voting Hillary (In the Primary)

By: McCain slaps the American public - Darkforum.com - Dark Stories, Dark Art, Poetry, Photography, Debates and Discussions

Fri, 08 Feb 2008 21:16:34 +0000

[...] Now Rush is saying something similar to Coulter. Stop The ACLU » Blog Archive » The Conservative Case For Voting Hillary (In the Primary) Pain is Nature’s way of saying “At least your still alive!” That which does not kill us hurts [...]

By: Snooper

Snooper — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 08:54:12 +0000

Jay…thanks for the clarification…for a minute or two I thought ya’ll lost your marbles like Ann C did! WHEW!!

I ain’t happy one bit about McLame and never have been since his apparent melt down in 2000. Prior to that he was acceptable but, you know the rest.

I’m all better now. I cannot believe how many ARE saying to let the country go to either Hillary or Barak. Simply amazing.

By: Jackie

Jackie — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 04:51:30 +0000

I also voted for Obama in my states primary, the obviously weaker candidate. Obama is a media creation and nothing more. He has no experience and will be easier to beat come November.

I thought we were all on the same page with this one?

By: Basil

Basil — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 03:00:15 +0000

In Georgia? Yeah, they had more vote in the Democratic primary than in the GOP primary. As is common.

And, I think, in the general election, Georgia will stay in the GOP camp. As is common. And like 1996 and 1964, two big GOP losses.

By: Jay

Jay — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:15:39 +0000

Didn’t you pay attention to what happened in Georgia?

By: Basil

Basil — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:11:31 +0000

I don’t think Obama has his daddy to help steal an election.

This whole JFK thing is, in my mind, way overblown.

As liberal as Hillary is, Obama is even more so. Particularly on Iraq.

I can’t imagine that any conservative with one eye and half sense would vote for Obama, or stay home and let the MTV kids vote him into office.

By: Jay

Jay — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 02:07:30 +0000

Its an argument of youthful JFK change vs. old insider experience. If Hillary wins that argument you’ll have conservatives unite in hate against her, and it will be two experienced candidates fighting. If Obama wins, you’ll have the Democrats unite behind youthful change. It will be the anti-war, youthful change candidate vs. the pro-war, old insider. If Hillary loses, I think McCain will too.

By: Basil

Basil — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:21:47 +0000

Obama is a flash in the pan. He has no experience and will be easily exposed for what he is: a fraud.

He’s nothing but an MTV candidate, and the attention span of his supporters will waver when they see a shiny penny or some other such nonsense.

I still think Hillary will be the nominee. But prolonging the race drains her money and will allow the Democrats to beat each other up. Like Reagan did to Ford in 1976, Kennedy did to Carter in 1980, and Buchanan did to Bush in 1992.

By: Jay

Jay — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:55:51 +0000

So you think Obama is the weaker candidate? Why so? We have a history of hate with Hillary. Obama is new and has the youth motivated behind him. Against McCain it would be young change vs. Old same.

By: Basil

Basil — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 00:42:49 +0000

Hey, I voted for Barack Hussein Obama in the primary on Tuesday for the same reason you’re saying to vote for Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton in the primary: to set up the weaker candidate to oppose the GOP nominee in November.

Same idea, different results.

Darn it, us conservatives can’t seem to get together on anything this year, can we?