<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Definitions for 2008 Election: Are YOU Informed?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heber</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/comment-page-1/#comment-67978</link>
		<dc:creator>Heber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 17:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/#comment-67978</guid>
		<description>Warner:

Yo stated &quot;your church has been doing its best to hide its unchristian ideas for many decades in order to appear mainstream&quot;.  Furthermore you state that &quot;many Mormons don&#039;t even know what their church really believes&quot;.

These are common reactions to someone who finds that what Mormons are taught in church is quite different than what you were told that they were taught.  To begin with a common and quite rediculous argument that is commonly brought up against Mormons is that they believe that Christ was created just like you and I ant that Christ was not begotten.  You will find the phrase &quot;Only Beggotten Son of the Father&quot; more than 40 times in the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and in the Pearl of Great Price.  While in the New and Old Testaments you will find the same phrase about 10 times.  

We have always taught and always will that Christ is in fact the Only Begotten Son of The Father.  

Most mormons from the age of 8 years old have a quite solid understanding of the basic foundations of our doctrine.  However, what they are taught differs significantly from what others are told that we are taught.

If we don&#039;t believe and were never taught something that you think we believe it is probably not that we don&#039;t know what we believe it is most likely that you were misinformed about what we believe.

In regards to whether we are real Christians or not based on how our beliefs differ from other denominations I think the onus of proving true christianity should lie not with those who Believe that Christ is the Only Beggotten Son of God as Christ himself stated but with those who have unscripturally assumed the creeds and councils of man and corrupted original Christian doctrine into some wierd &quot;uncomprehensible, uncreate, without passions, parts etc.&quot;.  

Christ is the &quot;Only Beggotten Son of the Father&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warner:</p>
<p>Yo stated &#8220;your church has been doing its best to hide its unchristian ideas for many decades in order to appear mainstream&#8221;.  Furthermore you state that &#8220;many Mormons don&#8217;t even know what their church really believes&#8221;.</p>
<p>These are common reactions to someone who finds that what Mormons are taught in church is quite different than what you were told that they were taught.  To begin with a common and quite rediculous argument that is commonly brought up against Mormons is that they believe that Christ was created just like you and I ant that Christ was not begotten.  You will find the phrase &#8220;Only Beggotten Son of the Father&#8221; more than 40 times in the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and in the Pearl of Great Price.  While in the New and Old Testaments you will find the same phrase about 10 times.  </p>
<p>We have always taught and always will that Christ is in fact the Only Begotten Son of The Father.  </p>
<p>Most mormons from the age of 8 years old have a quite solid understanding of the basic foundations of our doctrine.  However, what they are taught differs significantly from what others are told that we are taught.</p>
<p>If we don&#8217;t believe and were never taught something that you think we believe it is probably not that we don&#8217;t know what we believe it is most likely that you were misinformed about what we believe.</p>
<p>In regards to whether we are real Christians or not based on how our beliefs differ from other denominations I think the onus of proving true christianity should lie not with those who Believe that Christ is the Only Beggotten Son of God as Christ himself stated but with those who have unscripturally assumed the creeds and councils of man and corrupted original Christian doctrine into some wierd &#8220;uncomprehensible, uncreate, without passions, parts etc.&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Christ is the &#8220;Only Beggotten Son of the Father&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vibeke Madsen</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/comment-page-1/#comment-67950</link>
		<dc:creator>Vibeke Madsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 06:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/#comment-67950</guid>
		<description>And how do you make your conclusion that &quot;Mormons&quot;, which is the nickname for members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, are not &quot;Christians&quot;????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how do you make your conclusion that &#8220;Mormons&#8221;, which is the nickname for members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, are not &#8220;Christians&#8221;????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/comment-page-1/#comment-67937</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 04:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/#comment-67937</guid>
		<description>A thoughtful question.
When Martin Luther, John Williams,
and John Wesley all disagreed on many things, doctrinal and practices, with the Catholic Church....were they still Christians?  When they and their follows started their own churches, Luthern, Baptist and Methodist...were they still Christians?  When they were excommunicated from the Catholic Church, were they still Christians?
All these &quot;reformers&quot; are hailed as Christian icons.  Give it a few hundred years and virtually all people will view Joseph Smith as a Christian icon also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A thoughtful question.<br />
When Martin Luther, John Williams,<br />
and John Wesley all disagreed on many things, doctrinal and practices, with the Catholic Church&#8230;.were they still Christians?  When they and their follows started their own churches, Luthern, Baptist and Methodist&#8230;were they still Christians?  When they were excommunicated from the Catholic Church, were they still Christians?<br />
All these &#8220;reformers&#8221; are hailed as Christian icons.  Give it a few hundred years and virtually all people will view Joseph Smith as a Christian icon also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/comment-page-1/#comment-67935</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/#comment-67935</guid>
		<description>I think the question is not whether Mormons think themselves Christians, but whether most Christians consider Mormons in their fold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the question is not whether Mormons think themselves Christians, but whether most Christians consider Mormons in their fold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warner Todd Huston</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/comment-page-1/#comment-67934</link>
		<dc:creator>Warner Todd Huston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 03:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/#comment-67934</guid>
		<description>Bentillius,

I am sure that you think your faith believes in Jesus Christ in the orthodox Christian way. Your Church has been doing its best to hide its unChristian ideas for many decades in order to seem more mainstream. It has been so successful at it that many Mormons don&#039;t even know what their Church really believes. You aren&#039;t alone, for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bentillius,</p>
<p>I am sure that you think your faith believes in Jesus Christ in the orthodox Christian way. Your Church has been doing its best to hide its unChristian ideas for many decades in order to seem more mainstream. It has been so successful at it that many Mormons don&#8217;t even know what their Church really believes. You aren&#8217;t alone, for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thad Coons</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/comment-page-1/#comment-67887</link>
		<dc:creator>Thad Coons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 20:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/#comment-67887</guid>
		<description>The Mormons certainly count themselves as Christians. I believe that Jews, Muslims, Hindus, and Wiccans would also count them as Christians, since they accept the New Testament. 

   However, they also readily agree with claims that they are not orthodox or traditional, and even take pride in them: They accept the Book of Mormon and other revelations and reject most post-apostolic creeds and traditions.  

  The claims that Mormons are not Christians can be abbreviated: 1) Only traditional Christians can be counted as such, 2) The Mormon version of Christianity is a blasphemous counterfeit, and 3) If Mormons call themselves Christian they are lying.

   This seems to be at least a  partisan argument, and more theological than political, but partisan theological arguments and political bigotry are unfortunately not mutually exclusive, as almost the whole 16th and 17th century history of Europe demonstrates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mormons certainly count themselves as Christians. I believe that Jews, Muslims, Hindus, and Wiccans would also count them as Christians, since they accept the New Testament. </p>
<p>   However, they also readily agree with claims that they are not orthodox or traditional, and even take pride in them: They accept the Book of Mormon and other revelations and reject most post-apostolic creeds and traditions.  </p>
<p>  The claims that Mormons are not Christians can be abbreviated: 1) Only traditional Christians can be counted as such, 2) The Mormon version of Christianity is a blasphemous counterfeit, and 3) If Mormons call themselves Christian they are lying.</p>
<p>   This seems to be at least a  partisan argument, and more theological than political, but partisan theological arguments and political bigotry are unfortunately not mutually exclusive, as almost the whole 16th and 17th century history of Europe demonstrates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bentellius</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/comment-page-1/#comment-67884</link>
		<dc:creator>Bentellius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 19:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/#comment-67884</guid>
		<description>I am an active member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.  I believe in Jesus Christ and strive to follow his teachings.  I testify that Joseph Smith is and always will be the Prophet of the Restoration, and any man who reads my words with an honest heart will be touched by the Spirit of God.

Mr. Huston, you appear to be a very intelligent man.  My 1995 edition of Websters New World Dictionary defines bigot as such:

&quot;one who holds blindly and intolerantly to a particular creed, opinion, etc.&quot;

This dictionary also defines Christian; perhaps yours is different:

&quot;a believer in Jesus as the Messiah prophesied in the Old Testament, or in the religion based on the teachings of Jesus&quot;

According to this definition, a Christian is anyone who believes &quot;in Jesus as the Messiah prophesied in the Old Testament&quot;.  Even if this weren&#039;t an inextricable subject taught liberally by the Church and also by the Book of Mormon, the definition also provides that a &quot;Christian&quot; is &quot;a believer... in the religion based on the teachings of Jesus&quot;, also very much taught in the Church and the Book of Mormon.

You speak of logic.  I pray I have used it correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am an active member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints.  I believe in Jesus Christ and strive to follow his teachings.  I testify that Joseph Smith is and always will be the Prophet of the Restoration, and any man who reads my words with an honest heart will be touched by the Spirit of God.</p>
<p>Mr. Huston, you appear to be a very intelligent man.  My 1995 edition of Websters New World Dictionary defines bigot as such:</p>
<p>&#8220;one who holds blindly and intolerantly to a particular creed, opinion, etc.&#8221;</p>
<p>This dictionary also defines Christian; perhaps yours is different:</p>
<p>&#8220;a believer in Jesus as the Messiah prophesied in the Old Testament, or in the religion based on the teachings of Jesus&#8221;</p>
<p>According to this definition, a Christian is anyone who believes &#8220;in Jesus as the Messiah prophesied in the Old Testament&#8221;.  Even if this weren&#8217;t an inextricable subject taught liberally by the Church and also by the Book of Mormon, the definition also provides that a &#8220;Christian&#8221; is &#8220;a believer&#8230; in the religion based on the teachings of Jesus&#8221;, also very much taught in the Church and the Book of Mormon.</p>
<p>You speak of logic.  I pray I have used it correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ardis Parshall</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/comment-page-1/#comment-67875</link>
		<dc:creator>Ardis Parshall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/#comment-67875</guid>
		<description>Hmm. You haven&#039;t been paying attention. The charges of bigotry are not because people ask &quot;Are Mormons Christians?&quot; It *is* bigotry to say &quot;You shouldn&#039;t vote for Romney because he is a Mormon and Mormons aren&#039;t Christian&quot; or &quot;... because Mormons are racists&quot; or &quot;... because Mormons believe ridiculous things&quot; or &quot;... because Mormons are [fill in the blank].&quot;

Better understand the argument before you shoot down a phony version of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. You haven&#8217;t been paying attention. The charges of bigotry are not because people ask &#8220;Are Mormons Christians?&#8221; It *is* bigotry to say &#8220;You shouldn&#8217;t vote for Romney because he is a Mormon and Mormons aren&#8217;t Christian&#8221; or &#8220;&#8230; because Mormons are racists&#8221; or &#8220;&#8230; because Mormons believe ridiculous things&#8221; or &#8220;&#8230; because Mormons are [fill in the blank].&#8221;</p>
<p>Better understand the argument before you shoot down a phony version of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/comment-page-1/#comment-67874</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 18:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/#comment-67874</guid>
		<description>If I may Warner, I think that Jettboy is referring to there being no religious test to run for president.  Of course this isn&#039;t what you are talking about, and Jettboy is confused.  He seems to think that this part of our founding documents means that &quot;the people&quot; can not take someone&#039;s religion into consideration, or at least not ask questions about it, when considering them for president.  Of course this would be impossible to enforce, and more importantly isn&#039;t what the constitution referred to.  Of course what it refers to is that no law can keep a person of any religion from running for office.  There isn&#039;t anything there about a law keeping people from considering someone&#039;s religion in the decision making process of who they vote for.  

Maybe I&#039;m wrong, but I think that is what Jettboy was referring to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I may Warner, I think that Jettboy is referring to there being no religious test to run for president.  Of course this isn&#8217;t what you are talking about, and Jettboy is confused.  He seems to think that this part of our founding documents means that &#8220;the people&#8221; can not take someone&#8217;s religion into consideration, or at least not ask questions about it, when considering them for president.  Of course this would be impossible to enforce, and more importantly isn&#8217;t what the constitution referred to.  Of course what it refers to is that no law can keep a person of any religion from running for office.  There isn&#8217;t anything there about a law keeping people from considering someone&#8217;s religion in the decision making process of who they vote for.  </p>
<p>Maybe I&#8217;m wrong, but I think that is what Jettboy was referring to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warner Todd Huston</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/comment-page-1/#comment-67871</link>
		<dc:creator>Warner Todd Huston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2007/12/28/definitions-for-2008-election-are-you-informed/#comment-67871</guid>
		<description>Such questions are against the Constitution???

What the HELL are you mumbling about, jettboy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Such questions are against the Constitution???</p>
<p>What the HELL are you mumbling about, jettboy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

