Senate Committee: Over 400 Scientist Dispute Man Made GW Consensus Claims

Posted on December 21, 2007

My skepticism of the idea that mankind is solely responsible for the increase in the average temperature of the planet was well documented before the host change that Gribbit’s Word recently endured. That said, I can say that the morons at the Church of Global Warming of Modern Day Idiots have successfully media blitzed the world into believing their modern day flat earth society’s BS. Chalk that up to the only success that former VP and current High Priest of the MDI has ever, and I mean EVER, had. A Power Point propaganda presentation masquerading as a documentary for which High Priest Al Gore was given, not won or earned, but given a Nobel Prize.

In his propaganda film Gore announces that a “consensus” existed in the scientific community that supported his chicken little claims. This is an idea that this past year’s IPCC report tended to support but facts being facts seems to be lacking in truth.

According into a recent Senate Committee report over 400 scientists are debunking Mr. Gore’s claims.

Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called “consensus” on man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore. SOURCE

I was talking with someone the other day who doesn’t always see eye to eye with me on political issues about another subject and this person said that often times we as a society want to put a policy into place without fully knowing what that policy will do. The discussion was about making the HPV vaccine a requirement for all female public school students. The person I was speaking with stated a concern that the powers that be have no clue as to what kind of long term impact this vaccine will have. This is the same thing only larger.

Game show host and conservative commentator Pat Sajak asks 10 very important questions:

1. What is the perfect temperature?

2. Just what is the average temperature of the earth?

3. What factors have led to global warming in the past, and how do we know they arenâ€™t the causes of the current warming trend?

4. Why is there such a strong effort to stifle discussion and dissent?

5. Why are there such dramatically different warnings about the effects of man-made global warming?

6. Are there potential benefits to global warming?

7. Should such drastic changes in public policy be based on a â€œwhat if?â€ proposition?

8. What will be the impact on the people of the world if we change the way we live based on man-made global warming concerns?

9. How will we measure our successes?

10. How has this movement gained such momentum?

[To See Pat Sajak's explainations why he's asking each question visit Human Events Online]

These are questions that nobody on the other side of this debate can answer and they try to pretend that their lack of ability to answer them isn’t important. Ask yourself… Why?

Truth is if they were to get everything they want and nothing happens except for the fact that life becomes more difficult and more expensive as not only the economy of the United States, but they whole world collapses, they will move on to something else like the earth is entering a new ice age. Which is the exact same place that these same pinheads were at in 1974.

Any time a scientist says he’s certain that he has the answer and debate is over on the subject, that means he’s lying and has no clue as to what he’s talking about. When a liberal says it, it means that he’s lying and has no idea what he’s talking about. Get the picture?