Comments on: Did Tancredo Defeat Thompson?

By: Winghunter

Winghunter — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:35:28 +0000

I mistakenly gave credit to Tancredo for being able to spot a con man when he saw one but, using the same ridiculous reasoning as Hannity offered, “I sat down and talked with him.”…as if that meant anything at all with a record and past like Willard’s ( or The Huckster’s and Rudolph’s for that matter ).

We can correctly conclude then that high motivation for the right cause clearly doesn’t mean you have the intelligence to keep choosing the right path.

As for the voters; an intentional avoidance and failure of their duty as an American citizen to research the past beyond what the candidates offer today is painfully obvious here…is it any wonder why our elected officials in general are such complete clowns??

http://candidateresearch.blogspot.com/

By: Dave Pippin

Dave Pippin — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:16:37 +0000

Fred Thompson gets it folks. he is easily the best and most conservative candidate in this race. Huckabee is a fraud except on two issues. Mitt can’t decide what he stands for. I am with you Fred!

By: Jeff Molby

Jeff Molby — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:39:39 +0000

Ron Paul is not old right. You should look at the early Republican party platform and you will see that. He may be more of a Jacksonian Democrat.

I would thoroughly enjoy hearing you elaborate on that argument, Kerwin.

Which way are you leaning?

By: Janey

Janey — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:17:47 +0000

Good grief, the primaries are just beginning! In 2004, Kerry was polling in the single digits until a few days before the Iowa Cauci. Who picks our candidtes — voters? Or polling organizations?

The race is wide open. I’m voting for the guy whose views most closely match my own. I’m with Fred.

By: kerwin

kerwin — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:00:51 +0000

Ron Paul is not old right. You should look at the early Republican party platform and you will see that. He may be more of a Jacksonian Democrat.

If you want a Free Trade financial conservative that will sell the U.S. out to international bureaucracy then Fred is your man.

All I can say about the claim he is a social conservative is where is the beef. I would like to know what social conservative bills he sponsored or co-sponsored when he was in Congress.

By: Jeff Molby

Jeff Molby — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:16:45 +0000

I wish charisma didn’t matter, but we’re preaching to the choir here. We’re the minority that cares enough about politics to sit down and talk about it on a Thursday night. The rest of the world cares about charisma, whether or not they’re willing to admit it.

Ron Paul the Fraud

I love it! Thank you for that. The only candidate in decades that steadfastly maintains the Old Right position even when it means 534-1 and he’s “the fraud”. I’ve heard him called a lot of things over the past few months, but that one is just plain delicious.

By: Snooper

Snooper — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:09:12 +0000

Well stated, I might add. And, who cares about charisma? Bill Clinton? Smiling Mitt? Tax Happy Huck? Ron Paul the Fraud?

We are with Fred.

By: Jeff Molby

Jeff Molby — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:02:44 +0000

But just who or what are we electing next November? The guy with the pretty smile and easy joke? Or are we trying to elect someone with the penetrating mind and the Iron will to go to Washington and really try and change things while being able to stand tall for America as we face the many serious threats against us in a very uncertain world.

lol, and they say Paul supporters are crazy…. at least we know you need a unique platform if you’re going to run an uncharismatic candidate.