<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poll: Hillary Not So Inevitable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/11/26/poll-hillary-not-so-inevitable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/11/26/poll-hillary-not-so-inevitable/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 05:22:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Liberty Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/11/26/poll-hillary-not-so-inevitable/comment-page-1/#comment-65851</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberty Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 13:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/11/26/poll-hillary-not-so-inevitable/#comment-65851</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Interesting Poll Results&lt;/strong&gt;

John Hawkins did a survey of several conservative (right-leaning, as he calls them) bloggers on t&#8230;
Popularity: unranked [?]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Interesting Poll Results</strong></p>
<p>John Hawkins did a survey of several conservative (right-leaning, as he calls them) bloggers on t&#38;#8230;<br />
Popularity: unranked [?]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unclaimed</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/11/26/poll-hillary-not-so-inevitable/comment-page-1/#comment-65850</link>
		<dc:creator>Unclaimed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 10:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/11/26/poll-hillary-not-so-inevitable/#comment-65850</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been saying this for a while.  Her negatives are almost insurmountable, which is why it would be good for the GOP to have her be the Dem nominee.  I&#039;m going to be kicking myself if she somehow does win, but her consistent negatives around 50% make it seem virtually impossible for her to win, which is the only reason the right wasn&#039;t pushing harder for Newt, because only his negs are higher than hers.

That said, despite the way Iowa &#38; NH are shaping up, I&#039;m sticking with my long time prediction that it will be Giuliani vs. Hillary (VP Obama).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been saying this for a while.  Her negatives are almost insurmountable, which is why it would be good for the GOP to have her be the Dem nominee.  I&#8217;m going to be kicking myself if she somehow does win, but her consistent negatives around 50% make it seem virtually impossible for her to win, which is the only reason the right wasn&#8217;t pushing harder for Newt, because only his negs are higher than hers.</p>
<p>That said, despite the way Iowa &#38;#38; NH are shaping up, I&#8217;m sticking with my long time prediction that it will be Giuliani vs. Hillary (VP Obama).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

