Comments on: WaPo Not Even Trying to Hide Their Disgust for Iraq Turnaround… http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/11/18/wapo-not-even-trying-to-hide-their-disgust-for-iraq-turnaround/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:24:34 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: john Ryan http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/11/18/wapo-not-even-trying-to-hide-their-disgust-for-iraq-turnaround/comment-page-1/#comment-65722 john Ryan Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:41:31 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/11/18/wapo-not-even-trying-to-hide-their-disgust-for-iraq-turnaround/#comment-65722 When America reached the tipping point on Iraq it was not when teh casualties were at their highest. America (well 2 out of 3) want our troops brought home on a specified timetable. When America reached the tipping point on Iraq it was not when teh casualties were at their highest. America (well 2 out of 3) want our troops brought home on a specified timetable.

]]> By: Philadelphia Steve http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/11/18/wapo-not-even-trying-to-hide-their-disgust-for-iraq-turnaround/comment-page-1/#comment-65721 Philadelphia Steve Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:55:43 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/11/18/wapo-not-even-trying-to-hide-their-disgust-for-iraq-turnaround/#comment-65721 Part of the "drop" is due to General Petraeus' reclassification of deaths as "not being terrorist" related if they did not meet all his requirements (shot fromt he front no longer counts as "terrorism", just "crime"). Of course he did go back and reclassify the "old" deaths to match the new ones. But, of course, Conservatives are not permitted to speak about that, are they? Part of the “drop” is due to General Petraeus’ reclassification of deaths as “not being terrorist” related if they did not meet all his requirements (shot fromt he front no longer counts as “terrorism”, just “crime”). Of course he did go back and reclassify the “old” deaths to match the new ones.

But, of course, Conservatives are not permitted to speak about that, are they?

]]>