Google Censoring Criticism of Islam again
We read:
“The video content site YouTube has flagged a new campaign ad by Republican presidential candidate Tom Tancredo, warning of its content and requiring viewers to verify they are 18 or older. The 30-second spot airing on Iowa cable stations this week links the country’s illegal immigration problem to terrorism, depicting an attack on an American mall.
“There are consequences to open borders beyond the 20 million aliens who have come to take our jobs,” the narrator says. “Islamic terrorists now freely roam U.S. soil. Jihadists, who froth with hate, here to do what they have in London, Spain, and Russia.” …
YouTube is trying to make sure young viewers don’t have access to the ad. “This video or group may contain content that is inappropriate for some users, as flagged by YouTube’s user community,” says its warning. “To view this video or group, please verify you are 18 or older by logging in or signing up.”
Jihadi propaganda like this is OK, of course.
Google is getting so political that the time must surely come soon when conservatives stop using it for searches. There are plenty of alternatives: Live.com, yahoo.com etc.
(For more postings from me, see TONGUE-TIED, EDUCATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL, GREENIE WATCH, POLITICAL CORRECTNESS WATCH, FOOD & HEALTH SKEPTIC, GUN WATCH, SOCIALIZED MEDICINE, AUSTRALIAN POLITICS, DISSECTING LEFTISM, IMMIGRATION WATCH INTERNATIONAL and EYE ON BRITAIN. My Home Pages are here or here or here. Email me (John Ray) here.)
Email This
Posted by JonJayRay on November 16, 2007 8:35 am
» Filed Under 1st Amendment, ACLU, Liberal Media/Bias, News, War On Terror
Trackback URL:
- Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator: Thompson Calls For Bulking Up Military
Comments
One Response to “Google Censoring Criticism of Islam again”
-
-
-
Affiliations
The Giants
Advertise
-
-
Our Store
- Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
-
- More blogs about the ACLU
Syndicate Me
Those under 18 do not vote unless they will 18 by next November so this is not burdensome. The question is if all “violent” videos are treated the same.