Comments on: Indiana Court Upholds Constitution Against ACLU Attack http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/10/30/court-upholds-constitution-against-aclu-attack/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:11:40 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: Middle America http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/10/30/court-upholds-constitution-against-aclu-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-64768 Middle America Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:25:05 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/10/30/court-upholds-constitution-against-aclu-attack/#comment-64768 "Then House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, appealed that decision and current Speaker B. Patrick Bauer, D-South Bend, decided to continue it." If these two had not opposed the loony Judge decision, the freedom of religion would be lost for the house of Indiana. I commend them for fighting the good fight. “Then House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, appealed that decision and current Speaker B. Patrick Bauer, D-South Bend, decided to continue it.”

If these two had not opposed the loony Judge decision, the freedom of religion would be lost for the house of Indiana.

I commend them for fighting the good fight.

]]> By: kerwin http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/10/30/court-upholds-constitution-against-aclu-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-64767 kerwin Wed, 31 Oct 2007 05:20:54 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/10/30/court-upholds-constitution-against-aclu-attack/#comment-64767 It is the Seventh Court which seems to make a lot of good decisions. I have more trouble with the decisions made by the Ninth Court. It is the Seventh Court which seems to make a lot of good decisions. I have more trouble with the decisions made by the Ninth Court.

]]> By: Chris Leavitt http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/10/30/court-upholds-constitution-against-aclu-attack/comment-page-1/#comment-64766 Chris Leavitt Wed, 31 Oct 2007 04:40:21 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/10/30/court-upholds-constitution-against-aclu-attack/#comment-64766 Amazing. Four citizens thought they could take away the free expression of their elected legislators. Why didn't they run for office themselves, and find some other secular-progressives to run for office. Then, when they had a majority, they could end this practice, if they consider it so "offensive." Let's hope this signals an end to this "banning" of prayer through the courts. Amazing. Four citizens thought they could take away the free expression of their elected legislators. Why didn’t they run for office themselves, and find some other secular-progressives to run for office. Then, when they had a majority, they could end this practice, if they consider it so “offensive.” Let’s hope this signals an end to this “banning” of prayer through the courts.

]]>