<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bloomington Bans Bible, but Welcomes Buddha</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/10/21/bloomington-bans-bible-but-welcomes-buddha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/10/21/bloomington-bans-bible-but-welcomes-buddha/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:59:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Increase Mather</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/10/21/bloomington-bans-bible-but-welcomes-buddha/comment-page-1/#comment-64346</link>
		<dc:creator>Increase Mather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 14:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/10/21/bloomington-bans-bible-but-welcomes-buddha/#comment-64346</guid>
		<description>See, it doesn&#039;t work that way. I have a liberal friend I work with who is a member of the ACLU. Her argument is that for a religion to be banned from public entanglement with the government it has to be a religion that has lots of local adherents.

Same with Mulim Prayer Footbaths she says. That&#039;s OK. See, because the Muslims at the University of Michigan aren&#039;t attempting to get entangled with government, the govenment can choose to become entangled with them.

See, it&#039;s like abortion, excuse me, I mean &quot;choice&quot;. In this case the government gets to choose a religion to support in some way because it&#039;s for the good of all. It&#039;s only &quot;choice&quot; and &quot;choice&quot; is a good thing. Unless you want to take your kid out of public school. Then &quot;choice&quot; is bad.

I love talking to this ACLU members, I learn so much. Hope you did too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, it doesn&#8217;t work that way. I have a liberal friend I work with who is a member of the ACLU. Her argument is that for a religion to be banned from public entanglement with the government it has to be a religion that has lots of local adherents.</p>
<p>Same with Mulim Prayer Footbaths she says. That&#8217;s OK. See, because the Muslims at the University of Michigan aren&#8217;t attempting to get entangled with government, the govenment can choose to become entangled with them.</p>
<p>See, it&#8217;s like abortion, excuse me, I mean &#8220;choice&#8221;. In this case the government gets to choose a religion to support in some way because it&#8217;s for the good of all. It&#8217;s only &#8220;choice&#8221; and &#8220;choice&#8221; is a good thing. Unless you want to take your kid out of public school. Then &#8220;choice&#8221; is bad.</p>
<p>I love talking to this ACLU members, I learn so much. Hope you did too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
