<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACLU Begs Supreme Court to Review NSA Wiretapping Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/10/03/aclu-begs-supreme-court-to-review-nsa-wiretapping-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/10/03/aclu-begs-supreme-court-to-review-nsa-wiretapping-case/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:25:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Molby</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/10/03/aclu-begs-supreme-court-to-review-nsa-wiretapping-case/comment-page-1/#comment-63705</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Molby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/10/03/aclu-begs-supreme-court-to-review-nsa-wiretapping-case/#comment-63705</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;In other words, just as the court ruled, this case had absolutely zero standing.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Right, but standing is a technical matter. I respect the appellate court&#039;s decision, but it would be ludicrous to abandon a cause because of a technicality. The ACLU is right to continue pushing the cause until they get an authoritative ruling on the merits of the NSA program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In other words, just as the court ruled, this case had absolutely zero standing.</p></blockquote>
<p>Right, but standing is a technical matter. I respect the appellate court&#8217;s decision, but it would be ludicrous to abandon a cause because of a technicality. The ACLU is right to continue pushing the cause until they get an authoritative ruling on the merits of the NSA program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Front Page</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/10/03/aclu-begs-supreme-court-to-review-nsa-wiretapping-case/comment-page-1/#comment-63704</link>
		<dc:creator>Front Page</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 21:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/10/03/aclu-begs-supreme-court-to-review-nsa-wiretapping-case/#comment-63704</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Persistently Wasting The Taxpayer&#8217;s Money&lt;/strong&gt;

After being struck down in Federal Appeals Court for not having standing in the case, the ACLU is begging the Supreme Court for a review of their NSA wiretapping lawsuit.

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Persistently Wasting The Taxpayer&#38;#8217;s Money</strong></p>
<p>After being struck down in Federal Appeals Court for not having standing in the case, the ACLU is begging the Supreme Court for a review of their NSA wiretapping lawsuit.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
