Comments on: Prostitute Snorted Cocaine Off Infant’s Stomach While Breastfeeding

By: kerwin

kerwin — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 05:00:53 +0000

Since it is obvious drugs effect those around the user this example would not serve to convince those who say drugs are a victimless crime that they are wrong. Denial is a hard thing to get over for an addict of any type.

By: Mike Jay

Mike Jay — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 04:10:48 +0000

That is not shocking it happens everyday and she will most likely get out and do it all over again. It’s people like this who just don’t care about life or anyone else even there own it’s sad.

By: Jeff Molby

Jeff Molby — Wed, 03 Oct 2007 00:14:19 +0000

The argument that drugs only affect the user is preposterous

Yes, but no less preposterous than the argument that a certain behavior must be banned because it leads some people to act illegally.

Your pretty statistics carry little weight in a rational discussion, because you’re approaching it from the wrong direction.

100% of the removal-of-children-by-the-State cases that I have had revolve around parental substance abuse issues (and when parents are abusing substances, children eat spoiled food, walk around in dirty diapers, live and sleep in filthy clothes and bedding, donâ€™t learn to read,

So? There are already laws against all of that stuff. Convict the abusive parents based on them.

The relevant statistic is “Of all the people that use drug Z, occasionally or habitually, how many proceed to break laws?

But that number is too low to support your case, so you conveniently didn’t mention it.

By: Resa

Resa — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 23:45:55 +0000

Who carees about Brittney why did’t someone STOP the mother from harming the baby any more than she already had

By: PrivatePigg

PrivatePigg — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:09:45 +0000

The argument that drugs only affect the user is preposterous, and only shows that the speaker has no experience with drugs and drug users. As an attorney, I can tell you that 90% of the criminals that get appointed to me did their crime while under the influence of drugs, or because they needed money for drugs (burglary, robbery, assault). 100% of the removal-of-children-by-the-State cases that I have had revolve around parental substance abuse issues (and when parents are abusing substances, children eat spoiled food, walk around in dirty diapers, live and sleep in filthy clothes and bedding, don’t learn to read, etc.).

By: Ace of Spades HQ

Ace of Spades HQ — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 20:14:20 +0000

Very Late: Brit Loses Custody Of Kids; Given To K-Fed

The news and some vids here. For some reason I deemed yesterday “Serious Day” and didn’t bother. So let me get this straight: Britney is now unencumbered by the kidlets, and will almost certainly drink and drug herself into an…

By: Two Dogs

Two Dogs — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 20:11:40 +0000

Is this Brittany Spears going by an alias?