Comments on: Questioning Homosexual Marriage is “Hate speech” — Again

By: John Ray

John Ray — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 00:10:55 +0000

Nice to hear from a Leftist with some manners.
Pity you cannot spell, though. “Sight” or “site”?
I guess that managed ethernet services don’t require much literacy

By: Tony

Tony — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 23:25:56 +0000

Congratulations! Despite your aligning yourself with the far, far right (hence using propoganda temrs like “homosexual agenda” and “pro-family:), you are one of very few regressive-oriented sights which actualy has a comments section. Most of these “churchy/ white-people/ life is sacred for zygotes but not for convicted black people” sites do not allow comments to be posted. I assume because their arguments don’t stand up to any critique. I abhor your intentions, but applaud your willingness to allow dissent.

By: Terri

Terri — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:45:23 +0000

Change that. “hate speech” IS free speech. To ban it would be banning free speech and THAT wouldn’t get past the court. Then what I said . . . . .

Sorry

By: Terri

Terri — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:43:37 +0000

I’m sorry but “hate speech” is not free speech. I don’t think it will pass the constitutional test at the Supreme Court level. I know someone will have to spend some money to get it there but still . . . .

Now, if HRC becomes POTUS and changes the court all bets are off on how they change the constitution. I’m praying it doesn’t happen.