http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/05/22/no-free-speech-at-villanova-u-in-pennsylvania/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:01:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/05/22/no-free-speech-at-villanova-u-in-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-63153 Brujo Blanco Fri, 25 May 2007 03:04:56 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/05/22/no-free-speech-at-villanova-u-in-pennsylvania/#comment-63153 If the students were punished for vandalism in the form of graffiti is one thing. Attempting to control what they write in any form is wrong. Private universities are different that public universities. If the students were punished for vandalism in the form of graffiti is one thing. Attempting to control what they write in any form is wrong. Private universities are different that public universities.

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/05/22/no-free-speech-at-villanova-u-in-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-63152 NewtownMark Thu, 24 May 2007 16:23:21 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/05/22/no-free-speech-at-villanova-u-in-pennsylvania/#comment-63152 This is a private Catholic University. Do they not have the right to impliment punishment as they see fit? This is a private Catholic University. Do they not have the right to impliment punishment as they see fit?

]]> http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/05/22/no-free-speech-at-villanova-u-in-pennsylvania/comment-page-1/#comment-63151 gary l. day Tue, 22 May 2007 15:47:56 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/05/22/no-free-speech-at-villanova-u-in-pennsylvania/#comment-63151 I would be interested in seeing the comments in the Supreme Court case that actually establishes that graffiti deserves First Amendment protection. There IS such a case, isn't there? If there's not, your first sentence would not be --and the point of this entire item would be moot. I would be interested in seeing the comments in the Supreme Court case that
actually establishes that graffiti deserves First Amendment protection. There IS
such a case, isn’t there? If there’s not, your first sentence would not be
–and the point of this entire item would be moot.

]]>