Comments on: Rep. Murtha Proves Impeachment is About Criminalizing Conservatism

By: zk0sm0

zk0sm0 — Wed, 30 May 2007 14:33:56 +0000

tried to read this for giggles. stopped reading at this part:

“First, undercover CIA operatives do not work at Langleyâ€¦ ever.”

you obviously have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. apparently everything you know about the CIA you either pulled out of your rectum, learned from watching james bond movies, or just parrot from other idiot right-wingers who likewise have no idea what they are talking about.

By: jcb

jcb — Sat, 05 May 2007 00:26:49 +0000

The attorney general recused himself in the case… nice try.

You had Patrick Fitzgerald who has literally wrecked the Republican Party in Illinois (albeit deservedly) by indicting damn near everyone in the George Ryan administration… surely you don’t think he’s all the sudden a Kool-aid drinking GOPer?

By: gary l. day

gary l. day — Fri, 04 May 2007 20:59:14 +0000

Just to add to Tony’s facts (correct me if I’m wrong), but it was Republican
Sen. Trent Lott who said that Clinton’s fixation on bin Laden was an obsession,
and that Osama–and Islamic terrorism in general–did not pose much threat to
the U.S. Republicans at the time claimed that Clinton was merely using the
terrorist card to fear-monger and divert attention from Ken Starr’s investigation.

And in response to John: IF it was a crime to out Ms. Plame (who WAS
undercover), it would still fall on the Attorney General to prosecute said
crime. It would take an amazing blaze of denialism to baldly claim that
this Attorney General would ever, at any point, follow through on a case that
would reveal Bush Inc.’s lack of integrity and patriotism.

By: John Bambenek

John Bambenek — Tue, 01 May 2007 22:23:42 +0000

Tenet ordered an investigation to see if a law was broken… a variety of laws could have been in play that don’t require her to be an undercover operative because undercover operatives don’t work at Langley. But we can play that game two ways…

If she was an undercover operative, someone would have been indicted for outing her… didn’t happen, not undercover.

By: camanintx

camanintx — Tue, 01 May 2007 21:43:57 +0000

Further, â€œdisclosing the name of an undercover CIA operativeâ€ is simply not true. First, undercover CIA operatives do not work at Langleyâ€¦ ever.

I think former CIA Director George Tenet would disagree with you on this, otherwise he wouldn’t have asked to Justice Department to investigate.

By: Tony Roberts

Tony Roberts — Tue, 01 May 2007 15:18:50 +0000

And, I am not sure cowards serve in the military. Cowards are those like Cheney who take deferements to avoid military service and then traipse around like Darth Vader.

By: Tony Roberts

Tony Roberts — Tue, 01 May 2007 15:16:55 +0000

Where’s your anger at Cheney and Bush for not fighting, let alone volunterring like Kerry, in Vietnam? Dan Rather lost his job because of falsified documents, moron, but the underlying claim was never disproved. Where was your Republican outrage when Bush took office and for nine monthe never one-time mentioned directing attacks against Bin Laden. It took three-thousand dead just to get him to broach the subject and drag him away from My Pet Goat. If Clinton did such a poor job of managing Jihasdist threats, where was the outrage from the Republicans at the 2000 convention; at the debates; and during his first nine months of office. And, it was the Republicans who passed legislattion, yes legislation, demanding Clinton leave Somalia. Mkae your arguments with facts, not name-calling!

By: Dethanial

Dethanial — Tue, 01 May 2007 15:00:35 +0000

Watch where you get your facts. Murtha was in bed with John Kerry and another
butthole who caused us to lose the war in Vietnam. He is a coward not matter
how many medals he put himself in. And as far as Bush being AWOL you need to
find out why Dan Rather lost his job reporting false information. If Clinton
had not played chicken he would have gotten Bin Laden and not backed out of Solmia.
If Tony knew anything about the facts he would be dangerous. Yes he is brillian
the shinning example of an idiot.

By: Pat Penobscott

Pat Penobscott — Tue, 01 May 2007 14:04:00 +0000

I think itâ€™s true Bush, Rove and the rest have carefully done things in ways that leave them the defense that they havenâ€™t actually done anything illegal. However the very fact that an administration would be so very careful in making sure that they always have a legal defense is a strong indication they are up to no good. (Remember all those signing statements, Bush has given himself a legal out for just about every bill that had provisions he might not want to obey).

Given that so much corruption and mismanagement has occurred so close to this administration it is completely reasonable to assume that they are in the loop on at least some of this stuff. The alternative is to believe that they are the worst administration ever for having chosen so many crooks or incompetents. I donâ€™t really care whether they are simply incompetent or actually criminals, I just want to be rid of them so this country can get back on track.

What far-left are you talking about. I not even sure there is a medium-left anywhere in congress. Congress is made up of centrists, the right, and the far-right. What you imagine as the right fighting the left, is mostly different factions of conservatives fighting each other. Sure many of these conservatives call themselves Democrats, but they donâ€™t have all that much in common with a real political left if you look at things on a world wide scale.

By: Tammy

Tammy — Tue, 01 May 2007 12:54:42 +0000

Yup, seems so easy. If you don’t want an Republican in office, make up all sorts of excuses to impeach them.