<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The Democrats&#8217; Gonzales&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/04/27/the-democrats-gonzales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/04/27/the-democrats-gonzales/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 22:31:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nate Imbar</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/04/27/the-democrats-gonzales/comment-page-1/#comment-62875</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Imbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/04/27/the-democrats-gonzales/#comment-62875</guid>
		<description>The important thing to remember is that Harry Reid called the war in Iraq a &quot;quagmire&quot; and compared it to Vietnam. He said it would &quot;drag on&quot; indefinitely, costing billions. He accused the president of failing to specify how long our troops would have to stay, and he urged the administration to withdraw. When &quot;the body bags start coming home,&quot; Reid said, it&#039;s time to cut our losses.

Reid has talked about the need for peace. &quot;The White House has bombed its way around the globe,&quot; he sneered. &quot;International respect and trust for America has diminished every time we casually let the bombs fly.&quot; As for the current war plan, Reid complained that &quot;no one wants us to be there&quot; and that the president&#039;s crusade &quot;has harmed [our] standing in the world.&quot;

And given the climate, I suppose Reid was pushing his luck when he urged Congress to de-fund the war and &quot;pull out the forces we now have in the region.&quot; What&#039;s worse, Reid basically made the United States look like the bad guy. Once a U.S.-led coalition &quot;starts meddling in the internal affairs of sovereign nations, where does it stop?&quot; Reid asked. He charged that we were &quot;starting to resemble a power-hungry imperialist army&quot; and portrayed our mission as an &quot;occupation by foreigners.&quot;

Are all of these comments harsh? Do they undermine the troops while they&#039;re in harm&#039;s way? Do they amount, literally, to &quot;treason&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The important thing to remember is that Harry Reid called the war in Iraq a &#8220;quagmire&#8221; and compared it to Vietnam. He said it would &#8220;drag on&#8221; indefinitely, costing billions. He accused the president of failing to specify how long our troops would have to stay, and he urged the administration to withdraw. When &#8220;the body bags start coming home,&#8221; Reid said, it&#8217;s time to cut our losses.</p>
<p>Reid has talked about the need for peace. &#8220;The White House has bombed its way around the globe,&#8221; he sneered. &#8220;International respect and trust for America has diminished every time we casually let the bombs fly.&#8221; As for the current war plan, Reid complained that &#8220;no one wants us to be there&#8221; and that the president&#8217;s crusade &#8220;has harmed [our] standing in the world.&#8221;</p>
<p>And given the climate, I suppose Reid was pushing his luck when he urged Congress to de-fund the war and &#8220;pull out the forces we now have in the region.&#8221; What&#8217;s worse, Reid basically made the United States look like the bad guy. Once a U.S.-led coalition &#8220;starts meddling in the internal affairs of sovereign nations, where does it stop?&#8221; Reid asked. He charged that we were &#8220;starting to resemble a power-hungry imperialist army&#8221; and portrayed our mission as an &#8220;occupation by foreigners.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are all of these comments harsh? Do they undermine the troops while they&#8217;re in harm&#8217;s way? Do they amount, literally, to &#8220;treason&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

