From Lexis Nexis:
September 20, 2006 Wednesday
NASSAU AND SUFFOLK EDITION

SECTION: NEWS; Pg. A22

LENGTH: 440 words

HEADLINE: Abortion suit settled for $4M;
Woman and son, 6, born impaired, accept malpractice decision for medical errors in 1999 procedure

BYLINE: BY ANTHONY M. DESTEFANO. STAFF WRITER

BODY:

A Rockville Centre mother and her injured son won nearly $4.1 million in a settlement of a lawsuit against several doctors who failed to perform an abortion properly.

Karen Sheppard, 38, got $300,000 and her son, Jo’Ell Sheppard-Mobley, 6, received $3.8 million to settle charges that the doctors committed medical malpractice by mishandling the procedure, a misstep that led to Jo’Ell being born with physical and mental impairments, said Sheppard’s attorney, Bruce Cohen of Rockville Centre.

The lawsuit filed in State Supreme Court in Brooklyn was settled Monday in the midst of jury selection for a trial, Cohen said.

According to Cohen, the stage was set for a trial after the Court of Appeals, the state’s highest court, ruled in 2005 that Sheppard could revise her complaint to claim that she suffered emotional distress from the botched abortion.

“This opens up a door for women’s rights,” said Cohen, who said that previously the law generally didn’t allow a woman to recover for such injuries if a child was born alive.

According to court records, the case stemmed from the discovery in 1999 that a pregnant Sheppard was suffering from uterine fibroids, which doctors believed wouldn’t allow her to carry the fetus to term. Dr. Leslie King of Rockville Centre, an obstetrician, advised Sheppard to terminate the pregnancy and referred her to a second doctor, Ira Spector, who suggested she undergo a nonsurgical abortion with the drug methotrexate, which breaks down fetal tissue, the Court of Appeals wrote.

King administered the drug while Sheppard was in her seventh week of pregnancy. At a followup visit to a radiologist, a sonogram indicated there was no fetal heartbeat, according to the court. But Sheppard became concerned about abdominal and pelvic discomfort and, after getting another sonogram from a different radiologist, learned she was 28 weeks pregnant, according to court records.

Jo’ell was born March 3, 2000, suffering from fetal methotrexate syndrome and serious congenital problems that Sheppard claimed were caused by too small a dose of the abortion drug.

The Court of Appeals said Sheppard could seek compensation for emotional damages suffered resulting from having undergone the unsuccessful chemical abortion. The damages Sheppard for which she could be compensated were those that occurred before the birth of her baby, Cohen said.

The attorney said that Jo’ell has had five surgeries to repair skull deformities and a cleft palate. Cohen said Jo’ell also has impaired hearing and cognitive limitations.

Attorneys for King and Spector couldn’t be reached for comment yesterday. Sheppard also couldn’t be reached.

The fact that she waited 2 years before starting litigation also points to the money grab angle.

The fact that she tried to have an abortion gives a hint that the child may be unwanted…

At that point in time, sure. Glib said:

even after living two years with the blessing of this little miracle this sick woman still looks at her daughter as an “unwanted child.”

assuming she still feels that way and he had nothing to base that assumption on. In fact, given that she didn’t put the child up for adoption, one should assume the opposite.

This part should read:

“but it “was not done properly, causing the child to remain alive,” according to the complaint”

The fact that she tried to have an abortion gives a hint that the child may be unwanted…

Stop The ACLU highlights a woman suing because her baby was born. Only in Liberal World.
…

This is another reason why I’m all for sterilization.