<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Christians win one, lose one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/02/27/us-christians-win-one-lose-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/02/27/us-christians-win-one-lose-one/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:29:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/02/27/us-christians-win-one-lose-one/comment-page-1/#comment-61921</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/02/27/us-christians-win-one-lose-one/#comment-61921</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Truth and Hope Report: Earth to Liberals, We&#039;re At War&lt;/strong&gt;

I take on some sick liberals who wish Vice-President Cheney&#039;s would-be assassins had succeeded, expose hypocrisy among Congressional Democrats in regards to 527 groups and ask why liberals have a problem with &quot;Choose Life&quot; license plates which fund ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Truth and Hope Report: Earth to Liberals, We&#8217;re At War</strong></p>
<p>I take on some sick liberals who wish Vice-President Cheney&#8217;s would-be assassins had succeeded, expose hypocrisy among Congressional Democrats in regards to 527 groups and ask why liberals have a problem with &#8220;Choose Life&#8221; license plates which fund &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/02/27/us-christians-win-one-lose-one/comment-page-1/#comment-61920</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/02/27/us-christians-win-one-lose-one/#comment-61920</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Federal Prosectuor Criticized for Appearing with Iowa Christian Alliance&lt;/strong&gt;

Apparently, &#34;separation of church and state&#34; has been extended to one&#8217;s private time.
A federal prosecutor is serving as master of ceremonies for a Christian organization that sparked controver&#8230;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Federal Prosectuor Criticized for Appearing with Iowa Christian Alliance</strong></p>
<p>Apparently, &#38;#34;separation of church and state&#38;#34; has been extended to one&#38;#8217;s private time.<br />
A federal prosecutor is serving as master of ceremonies for a Christian organization that sparked controver&#38;#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gary l. day</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2007/02/27/us-christians-win-one-lose-one/comment-page-1/#comment-61919</link>
		<dc:creator>gary l. day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 14:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2007/02/27/us-christians-win-one-lose-one/#comment-61919</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re being misleading as to what the judge actually said in the
Repent America case. The judge actually said that Repent America
had the right to publicly express their opinions (just like the
festival-goers and Pride marchers), but RA did NOT have the right
to disrupt the festival or the parade. In the two years since the
original incident, RA has remained a presence at the annual
Philadelphia Gay Pride parade and festival--and so they are NOT
being &quot;silenced&quot; as you claim--but they are not permitted
to harass people or intrude on or disrupt the festival. I&#039;m sure
that you still consider that a leftist abridgement of free speech,
unless a bunch of gay activists decided to intrude on an evangelical
church service. I&#039;m sure you&#039;d THEN welcome the restriction on
intrusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re being misleading as to what the judge actually said in the<br />
Repent America case. The judge actually said that Repent America<br />
had the right to publicly express their opinions (just like the<br />
festival-goers and Pride marchers), but RA did NOT have the right<br />
to disrupt the festival or the parade. In the two years since the<br />
original incident, RA has remained a presence at the annual<br />
Philadelphia Gay Pride parade and festival&#8211;and so they are NOT<br />
being &#8220;silenced&#8221; as you claim&#8211;but they are not permitted<br />
to harass people or intrude on or disrupt the festival. I&#8217;m sure<br />
that you still consider that a leftist abridgement of free speech,<br />
unless a bunch of gay activists decided to intrude on an evangelical<br />
church service. I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;d THEN welcome the restriction on<br />
intrusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
