Comments on: Drudge: ISRAEL PLANS NUCLEAR STRIKE ON IRAN

By: kerwin_brown

kerwin_brown — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 04:49:15 +0000

I am not surprised. The problem with nuclear weapons is that he who strikes first can also be he who strikes last, so the willingness to make a preemptive strike is almost a must if you are not self destructive. This tends to lead to nuclear war in those cases one of the parties is perceived to be irrational. Enter Iran and their President who at best sounds irrational.

By: Stephen

Stephen — Mon, 08 Jan 2007 01:23:47 +0000

IRAN SAYS 2007 COULD BRING ISLAMIC MESSIAH, POSSIBLY THIS SPRING
http://www.crusade-media.com/news42.html

Also an article on why Ahmadinejad should be indicted:

http://www.crusade-media.com/news44.html

By: Right on the Right

Right on the Right — Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:26:43 +0000

Israel’s Plan to Nuke Iran

I know, I know, it sounds too good to be true. That’s because it is. Israel does apparently have a plan to strike Iran with tactical nuclear warheads but it’s all hypothetical and it’s IF a whole list of things happens first. It&#8217…

By: A Blog For All

A Blog For All — Sun, 07 Jan 2007 20:00:14 +0000

On Israeli Preparations for Iranian Nuclear Strike

For starters, should this be this a surprise to anyone? Not to me it isn’t. Indeed, Texas Rainmaker points out that the same paper made similar statements in December 2005 that Israel was preparing for strikes against Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

By: Below The Beltway

Below The Beltway — Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:47:01 +0000

Is Israel Planning To Nuke Iran ?

Bookmark to:
…

By: Outside The Beltway | OTB

Outside The Beltway | OTB — Sun, 07 Jan 2007 13:40:34 +0000

Israel Planning Nuclear Strike on Iran?

Israel is planning to strike Iranâ€™s uranium enrichment facilities with bunker buster nukes, Uzi Mahnaimi and Sarah Baxter report in the Sunday Times of London. They cite “several Israeli military sources” who say two Israeli air force s…

By: Jeff Molby

Jeff Molby — Sun, 07 Jan 2007 12:28:01 +0000

Jeff: Youâ€™re right. We should just surrender now. Right? I mean it is the â€œhigh roadâ€
to take. Right?

Clay, I say things for a reason and I omit things for a reason. I would appreciate it if you would stop pretending I’ve said things that I haven’t.

I made one assertion: Launching a missile strike at a country with nuclear ambitions is significantly more likely to increase their ambitions rather than decrease them.

By: The Amboy Times

The Amboy Times — Sun, 07 Jan 2007 10:22:52 +0000

Israel to Nuke Iran

I doubt it, but here’s the story. Hat tip, Stop the ACLU, who has a huge round up:ISRAEL has drawn up secret plans to destroy Iranâ€™s uranium enrichment facilities with tactical nuclear weapons. Two Israeli air force squadrons are training

By: Right Pundits

Right Pundits — Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:46:06 +0000

Israel Plans a Nuclear Strike on Iran

Israel plans to use nuclear weapons against Iran according to reports, in order to destroy uranium enrichment facilities that are deeply fortified. That is interesting if it is true, but often these sort of military reports are red herring blusters,…

By: mikem

mikem — Sun, 07 Jan 2007 07:02:13 +0000

I read the two together (attacking with nuclear weapons and “only if stipulations as being a rather obvious attempt to force a US attack on Iran. Good luck with that. I’ll cheer for Israel all the way, but will not support the sacrifice of American lives in place of Israeli.