“RECOMMENDATION 16/17,” An Echo From The Holocaust?
Posted on December 7, 2006
“Recommendation 16/17,” those words sound like a document from The Holocaust. But they are not, they are from the ISG:
RECOMMENDATION 16: In exchange for these actions and in the context of a full and secure peace agreement, the Israelis should return the Golan Heights, with a U.S. security guarantee for Israel that could include an international force on the border, including U.S. troops if requested by both parties.
Update: Whats the importance of the Golan Heights?
Overlooking northern Israel and southern Syria, the heights give Israel an excellent vantage point for monitoring Syrian movements. The topography provides a natural buffer against any military thrust from Syria.
The area is also a key source of water for an arid region. Rainwater from the Golan’s catchment feeds into the Jordan River. The area provides a third of Israel’s water supply.
And I thought RECOMMENDATION 16 was bad:
RECOMMENDATION 17: Concerning the Palestinian issue, elements of that negotiated peace should include:
Sustainable negotiations leading to a final peace settlement along the lines of President Bush’s two-state solution, which would address the key final status issues of borders, settlements,
Jerusalem, the right of return, and the end of conflict.
What is the practical effect of “right of return?”
If all the Palestinian refugees and their descendants (estimates range between 5 and 8 million people) were to return to their original home within Israel this would lead to a demographic shift which would end Israel’s status as a Jewish state, as Israel’s current population is composed of about 5.5 million Jews and 1.3 million Muslims.
» Filed Under Uncategorized
Trackback URL
Comments
4 Responses to ““RECOMMENDATION 16/17,” An Echo From The Holocaust?”
-
Affiliations
The Giants
-
Advertise
Donate
Our Store
Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
Stop the ACLU blogburst
-
More blogs about the ACLU
Syndicate Me
What the hell value is a “US security guarantee” if we actually implement this plan? We’re supposed to abandon our goals, surrender to our enemies, pay tribute to our enemies, and ask Israel to see something worthwhile in our “guarantee”?
I’m still blown away that such a military genius as Sandra O’Connor was asked to help author this.
So much for Israel being a sovereign nation.
Israel’s low population is their own fault as they have legalized abortion. I do not feel sorry for them if they are destroyed because of it. They do have some limits on it so they are probably more secure than many Western nations.
Yup James Jihad Baker’s real intentions for the “Iraq” Study Group become apparent- did a report on this yesterday- One fella on another site said something like this “suppose we were in Poland helping them fight terrorism- what Baker is now suggesting that we do by inviting Iran to ‘help’ in Iraq is akin to requesting that Hitler help out in Poland.” NO WAY would we go for that back then, yet incredibly, because Israel is the one who will suffer the most, We’re suggesting the Iran and Syria- two nations who would love nothing more than to murder every last Jew, help out in Iraq?
There are some TRULY black hearts in this world, and I believe both Jimmy Jihad Baker, and Jimmy Jihad Carter are two VERY black hearts indeed! http://sacredscoop.com