Comments on: Supreme Court Rejects NY Times On Leak Probe http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:59:35 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: SacredScoop.com - Christian news, commentary, and inspiring daily devotions » NSA Protects Privacy? http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-59185 SacredScoop.com - Christian news, commentary, and inspiring daily devotions » NSA Protects Privacy? Thu, 30 Nov 2006 02:53:08 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/#comment-59185 [...] We’re told now that the reason President Bush didn’t reveal details now was because he was concerned about the sheer of people who would have information about the program in light of all the leaks of sensitive information that mainstream media kept reporting- mainly the New York Times- who incidently were just rebuffed by the Supreme Court and told that they had no right blocking the government from reviewing phone records from two employees who apparently blabbed secret governmental information that tipped off terrorists about our government’s surveillance. Stop The ACLU has the story on this. [...] [...] We’re told now that the reason President Bush didn’t reveal details now was because he was concerned about the sheer of people who would have information about the program in light of all the leaks of sensitive information that mainstream media kept reporting- mainly the New York Times- who incidently were just rebuffed by the Supreme Court and told that they had no right blocking the government from reviewing phone records from two employees who apparently blabbed secret governmental information that tipped off terrorists about our government’s surveillance. Stop The ACLU has the story on this. [...]

]]> By: Right Voices » Blog Archive » SCOTUS: Turn Over Those Phone Records http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-59184 Right Voices » Blog Archive » SCOTUS: Turn Over Those Phone Records Wed, 29 Nov 2006 22:16:09 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/#comment-59184 [...] Jay says: “I have to wonder if Ginsburg was sleeping again for this ruling.” Not nice Jay, funny, but not nice.. [...] [...] Jay says: “I have to wonder if Ginsburg was sleeping again for this ruling.” Not nice Jay, funny, but not nice.. [...]

]]> By: Conservative Outpost http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-59178 Conservative Outpost Tue, 28 Nov 2006 15:23:05 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/#comment-59178 <strong>Supreme Court tells NY Times to fess up</strong> The Supreme Court tells the NY Times that there will be no hiding behind the 1st Amendment for reporters when it comes to our nation's security:The Supreme Court ruled against The New York Times on Monday, refusing to block the... Supreme Court tells NY Times to fess up
The Supreme Court tells the NY Times that there will be no hiding behind the 1st Amendment for reporters when it comes to our nation’s security:The Supreme Court ruled against The New York Times on Monday, refusing to block the…

]]> By: Webloggin http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-59169 Webloggin Tue, 28 Nov 2006 13:19:43 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/#comment-59169 <strong>The New York Times Fails In Effort To Block Justice Department Investigation</strong> Where is the line drawn between informing the public and causing them harm? Thankfully we are about to learn the answer to that question courtesy of the man who was going to bring the New York Times “Fitzmas” just a short while back. ... The New York Times Fails In Effort To Block Justice Department Investigation
Where is the line drawn between informing the public and causing them harm? Thankfully we are about to learn the answer to that question courtesy of the man who was going to bring the New York Times “Fitzmas” just a short while back.

…

]]> By: NoisyRoom.net &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; SCOTUS Rules Against New York Times http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-59170 NoisyRoom.net &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; SCOTUS Rules Against New York Times Tue, 28 Nov 2006 04:17:52 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/#comment-59170 [...] Woo Hoo! A victory for the good guys. The Supreme Court ruled against The New York (Crimes Slimes Traitors) Times. Ginsburg must have been suffering from sleep apnea. From STACLU Here; The Supreme Court ruled against The New York Times on Monday, refusing to block the government from reviewing the phone records of two Times reporters in a leak investigation of a terrorism-funding probe. [...] [...] Woo Hoo! A victory for the good guys. The Supreme Court ruled against The New York (Crimes Slimes Traitors) Times. Ginsburg must have been suffering from sleep apnea. From STACLU Here; The Supreme Court ruled against The New York Times on Monday, refusing to block the government from reviewing the phone records of two Times reporters in a leak investigation of a terrorism-funding probe. [...]

]]> By: Church and State http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-59171 Church and State Tue, 28 Nov 2006 04:05:34 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/#comment-59171 <strong>Treasoners Run to Ginsberg for Protection</strong> Gasp! No! Why, that could lead to a conviction! We can't have that. Treasoners Run to Ginsberg for Protection
Gasp! No! Why, that could lead to a conviction! We can’t have that.

]]> By: Nazareth http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-59172 Nazareth Tue, 28 Nov 2006 03:51:46 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/#comment-59172 One small leap for man- One GIANT victory for all mankind! Yay on them for showing some backbone and standing up to the terror propogandists! Errr I mean the New York Times. http://sacredscoop.com One small leap for man- One GIANT victory for all mankind! Yay on them for showing some backbone and standing up to the terror propogandists! Errr I mean the New York Times. http://sacredscoop.com

]]> By: Bill's Bites http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-59173 Bill's Bites Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:55:45 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/#comment-59173 <strong>Supreme Court to NYTimes: Buzz off</strong> See previous: NY Times Seeks Help From Ruth Bader Ginsburg Against Feds’ Investigation Into Tipping Off Terror Funding CharitiesSupreme Court to NYTimes: Buzz offMichelle Malkin I noted the NYTimes' attempt this weekend to seek protection from Justi... Supreme Court to NYTimes: Buzz off
See previous: NY Times Seeks Help From Ruth Bader Ginsburg Against Feds’ Investigation Into Tipping Off Terror Funding CharitiesSupreme Court to NYTimes: Buzz offMichelle Malkin I noted the NYTimes’ attempt this weekend to seek protection from Justi…

]]> By: Sister Toldjah &#38;#187; Supremes to NYTimes: Gov&#38;#8217;t should be allowed to review your phone records http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-59174 Sister Toldjah &#38;#187; Supremes to NYTimes: Gov&#38;#8217;t should be allowed to review your phone records Tue, 28 Nov 2006 02:39:09 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/#comment-59174 [...] Posted By: Sister Toldjah in: Media Watch, Law/Judiciary, US Supreme Court | EMail This Post | Print This Post | &nbsp;&nbsp; Trackback URI for this post:http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/27/supremes-to-nytimes-govt-should-be-allowed-to-review-your-phone-records/trackback/ &#187; [...] [...] Posted By: Sister Toldjah in: Media Watch, Law/Judiciary, US Supreme Court | EMail This Post | Print This Post | &#38;nbsp;&#38;nbsp; Trackback URI for this post:http://sistertoldjah.com/archives/2006/11/27/supremes-to-nytimes-govt-should-be-allowed-to-review-your-phone-records/trackback/ &#38;#187; [...]

]]> By: Judicious Asininity http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/comment-page-1/#comment-59175 Judicious Asininity Tue, 28 Nov 2006 01:59:36 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/11/27/supreme-court-rejects-ny-times-on-leak-probe/#comment-59175 [...] Via Stop the ACLU and AP: the Supreme Court has refused to stop the DOJ from reviewing the phone records of former NYT reporter Judith Miller and current NYT reporter Philip Shenon to find out who revealed:the government?s plans to freeze the assets of two Islamic charities, the Holy Land Foundation and the Global Relief Foundation. Shenon and Miller called the two organizations for comment after being told by confidential sources of the government?s plans. The Justice Department says the move tipped off the charities of planned government raids. The federal judge who ruled in the Times? favor said there is no evidence in the case even suggesting that the reporters tipped off the charities about the raids or that the reporters even knew of the government?s plans to raid either charity.This is the tip of the iceberg for the NYT and the WPO. Since 9/11, these two papers have spent acres of front page real estate revealing national security secrets leaked by traitors in the CIA, DOD and FBI. Most of the remaining metriopolitan papers in the US have reprinted these stories without question. Now, the sources for all these stories can be tracked down and prosecuted. The other story that strikes a massive blow on MSM cedibility has been picked up by the blogosphere. We denizens in the blogosphere have long known that MSM reporters in Iraq, with some notable exceptions, bed down in a green zone hotel and use Iraqi stringers to do their reporting. The reporters' suspicion of the military means that they rarely cross-check their stringer's stories. So, it is no surprise to learn that the bogus reports of six Sunni men being burned alive come to use via such a stringer, one Qais al-Bashir. Flopping Aces owns this story, with great support from Junkyard Blog. It will take time, but people will begin to see that the MSM coverage from Iraq has been provided by enemy agents and given the stamp of credibility by the MSM. I'm fairly certain that the Time magazine reports of a massacre sat Haditha will turn out to be yet another enemy propaganda ploy spread by our MSM and believed by Rep. Murtha. The next two years are going to be very interesting and our friends in the MSM may well wish they had not rooted so strongly for the enemy and the Democrats, but I repeat myself. Posted by: Pat on Nov 27, 06 | 7:42 pm | [0] comments [0] Views | Permalink | [0] TrackBack | Go to Main Page Random Posts Time for the GOP to target the UN Now Iraq is like Vietnam Neocons vs. Neoleftists var site="sm6blogger" Judicious Asininity &gt;&gt;www.asininity.com 2004PHP [...] [...] Via Stop the ACLU and AP: the Supreme Court has refused to stop the DOJ from reviewing the phone records of former NYT reporter Judith Miller and current NYT reporter Philip Shenon to find out who revealed:the government?s plans to freeze the assets of two Islamic charities, the Holy Land Foundation and the Global Relief Foundation. Shenon and Miller called the two organizations for comment after being told by confidential sources of the government?s plans. The Justice Department says the move tipped off the charities of planned government raids. The federal judge who ruled in the Times? favor said there is no evidence in the case even suggesting that the reporters tipped off the charities about the raids or that the reporters even knew of the government?s plans to raid either charity.This is the tip of the iceberg for the NYT and the WPO. Since 9/11, these two papers have spent acres of front page real estate revealing national security secrets leaked by traitors in the CIA, DOD and FBI. Most of the remaining metriopolitan papers in the US have reprinted these stories without question. Now, the sources for all these stories can be tracked down and prosecuted. The other story that strikes a massive blow on MSM cedibility has been picked up by the blogosphere. We denizens in the blogosphere have long known that MSM reporters in Iraq, with some notable exceptions, bed down in a green zone hotel and use Iraqi stringers to do their reporting. The reporters’ suspicion of the military means that they rarely cross-check their stringer’s stories. So, it is no surprise to learn that the bogus reports of six Sunni men being burned alive come to use via such a stringer, one Qais al-Bashir. Flopping Aces owns this story, with great support from Junkyard Blog. It will take time, but people will begin to see that the MSM coverage from Iraq has been provided by enemy agents and given the stamp of credibility by the MSM. I’m fairly certain that the Time magazine reports of a massacre sat Haditha will turn out to be yet another enemy propaganda ploy spread by our MSM and believed by Rep. Murtha. The next two years are going to be very interesting and our friends in the MSM may well wish they had not rooted so strongly for the enemy and the Democrats, but I repeat myself. Posted by: Pat on Nov 27, 06 | 7:42 pm | [0] comments [0] Views | Permalink | [0] TrackBack | Go to Main Page Random Posts Time for the GOP to target the UN Now Iraq is like Vietnam Neocons vs. Neoleftists var site=”sm6blogger” Judicious Asininity &#38;gt;&#38;gt;www.asininity.com 2004PHP [...]

]]>