In case you didn’t go back and read the comments on the post from which you pull Brayton’s quote…your hero got his tail handed to him big time. You might have checked that out before you encouraged more people to go over there to witness that mess.

It’s obvious who the real coward is meatbrain. The last several times you’ve “confronted” me it’s with Brayton quotes. Come up with an idea of your own and then maybe we can talk.

The reason why your comments are deleted is because you add exactly nothing to the debate and you’ve proven yourself unable to do so. What, do you think that a quote from Ed Brayton makes you some sort of invincible debater that makes the folks here just shrivel?

You are not booted from the comment section because you are a threat, you are booted because your contributions are worthless. Thanks for proving it all over again.

I would be glad to make my case, but it sounds from KB’s comment that whatever comments he’s responded was irrelevant to my post anyway. What have I “defended” here that has anything to do with suspending habeas corpus?

For those readers not familiar with the details, I thought I would describe how electronic voting works, why it’s secure, and therefore why Democrats — I mean we — can trust it implicitly.

You need to read the U.S. Constitution specifically Article 1 Section 9 which states “The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” The attack on 9/11 meant the condition so Congress does have the power to suspend the writ of habeas corpus if the want. As far as I know they have not decided to do so. When suspended that writ allows the President to do all that you say Glib defends.

That “unchecked totalitarian” power is written into the Constitution that protects our freedom.

You may not believe the current situation is sufficient to present a need which is your opinion and may not be shared by the majority. You are free to make your case as is Glib.