ACLU: Anti-Christian Liberals Union
Posted on October 25, 2006
Liberals always act shocked and astonished that conservatives believe that an organization claiming to be the guardian of religious liberty is actually America’s number one religious censor. They will spout off token cases where the ACLU veered from its normal path of hostility toward Christian religious expression to defend free speech. They have a handful of cases they try to convince us with. However, the ACLU’s history can easily be looked at, and the cases against religious expression far outweigh these token cases. If the ACLU were consistent in its positions on religious liberty despite the religion, their defense on the issue would be much easier. However, many cases point out that it isn’t religion in general the ACLU fight, but the Christian religion in particular.
When the Tangipahoa Parish School Board in Louisiana opened its board meetings with a prayer, like they had for 30 years, the ACLU sued. After the ACLU won that case and the School Board ignored the court ruling, Louisiana ACLU chief Joe Cook called for them to be jailed and compared them to terrorists. Mr. Cook is currently leading an attack on plan for a Katrina memorial paid for with private funds, to be erected on private land, simply because it is in the shape of a cross and might offend some sensitive passerby. When valedictorian of Foothill High, Brittany McComb, decided to share her faith voluntarily at her graduation ceremony, the ACLU said it was the right call to pull the plug. And of course we are all familiar with the ACLU’s crusade to eliminate the Mt. Soledad war memorial because it is a cross that might offend some atheist.
It has become a tradition for the ACLU to attack Christian nativity scenes every Christmas. They have already started early this year. We have all witnessed the ACLU’s hatred of Ten Commandment displays across the nation. The ACLU sue city council after city council over praying in Jesus’ name. They don’t sue to stop all prayer, but in every case the target has been Christian prayer. They even fought for the right of a Wiccan to pray at a council meeting. Many times it doesn’t even take a lawsuit. They just type up a threatening letter and that does the trick.
If the ACLU were consistent to oppose all religions in its separation of church and state quest it would be one thing, but in all too many cases it is Christianity that is targeted while other religions get a pass. The cases of double standards are numerous. A few blatant examples are how the ACLU fought to revoke the tax exempt status of the Catholic Church while fighting for a tax exemption for Wiccans and how they fight against any Christianity being exposed to school children yet are found absent when Islamic indoctrination is going on. In fact, they were involved in creating the rules to allow such indoctrination to take place.
There is no doubt that the ACLU are overzealous in their quest to secularize America and erase its Christian heritage. The good news is that there are organizations out there fighting them, and people standing up to protest against them. Currently they are attacking Lakeview Elementary School for promotion of a Prayer at the Flagpole event, a National Day of Prayer event, the activities of a “Praying Parents” group, teacher-led voluntary classroom prayers, and a Christian theme and overtly religious songs at a Christmas program. The school is not denying these charges but asserting that Muslim, Jewish, and Hindu students have “a constitutional right to pray or to read their scriptures at school as well. They did not cave in to the ACLU’s threats but gathered a group of over 600 people to protest the ACLU in a prayer vigil.
The prayer rally, organized by two Mt. Juliet commissioners, drew hundreds, with about 200 stuck in a 1.5-mile traffic jam. The event, which also attracted some local politicians and pastors, took place outside the school recently named in a lawsuit for alleged constitutional violations.
It is encouraging to see people standing up to the ACLU in defense of their rights that they feel are being threatened. However, this will not stop the ACLU from proceeding with its attacks. On the other hand it will ultimately be the power of the people and their desire for freedom that will have to put a stop to the ACLU’s attempts to criminalize Christian free speech through the courts. One effective way to assert this power is to get out and vote for people that oppose the ACLU’s anti-Christian agenda.
Every time the ACLU wins a case against these small schools and local governments they are awarded massive money in attorney’s fees through your tax dollars. Often this is used to threaten these cash strapped schools and local governments to surrender before the case even goes before a court. There is current legislation, the Public Expression of Religion Act, that seeks to put a stop to this extortion. It has already passed the House and will be up for vote soon in the Senate. It is very unlikely it will pass if liberals take control. Put an end to this abuse. Get out and vote for people you know will support this much needed legislation. Cut the ACLU off from the government teat.
This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please email Jay at Jay@stoptheaclu.com or Gribbit at GribbitR@gmail.com. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 200 blogs already on-board.
» Filed Under 1st Amendment, ACLU, Christmas, Church And State, News
Trackback URL
Comments
7 Responses to “ACLU: Anti-Christian Liberals Union”
Affiliations
The Giants
-
Donate
Suggestions
Our Store
Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
More blogs about the ACLU
Great post.
The ACLU wants God out of America for the same reason the thief wants the police out of the city.
Jay,
I was several paragraphs into your post and I was preparing responses for each case that you cited, but then I realized that we’ve already discussed a lot of them. So, I figure we have a few choice to make.
1. We can continue to spend a lot of time sparring over individual cases, without ever coming to an understanding.
2. We can agree to disagree, part ways, and continue preaching to our respective choirs
3. We can take a step back and talk about our different viewpoints that lead us to make different assumptions and different conclusions.
I’m rooting for #3. What do you say?
The First Amendment does state that Congress should make no law showing bias for a religious organization and should allow the free expression of religion.
If we decided to violate the U.S. Constitution and apply it to the state and local governments then
The Wicca should be allowed to prey at the council meetings.
The Hindu and other religious students should also be allowed to pray or read their scriptures at school.
You could make a case that at least some of the signers of the U.S. Constitution were only speaking about Christian religions but some of them were also free masons who would not have made such a distinction. This of course leads the debate up to the legislators and not to the courts to resolve.
There is no separation of church and state written in the U.S Constitution. I challenge anyone to cite one place that states any such thing.
Kerwin, I would never argue against Wiccans to pray at city counsil meetings or Hindus to pray at school. I was merely pointing out the double standards of the ACLU. Either religious expression must be stifled for all when they enter the school, or it should be accomodated for.
The ACLU’s position regarding church and state is really quite simple. Government entities should not be promoting any religious activities. Where they do make accommodations for peoples religious beliefs, they may not discriminate against any specific religious belief. Where is the double standard there?
“Liberals always act shocked and astonished that conservatives believe that an organization claiming to be the guardian of religious liberty is actually America’s number one religious censor.”
No, actually, liberals are never surprised when deluded conservatives whine about the suppression of their theocratic aims. IDoing this is an integrral part of the martyring process that makes Christianity the steaming hunk of dung that it is and always has been.
Paul Yanna,
I find the Atheist theological aims a whole lot more oppressive than the Christians in America have ever been. The ACLU is the champion of those that hate freedom of religion and is very intolerant of religious expression.
The only objection I have, is not all liberals or atheist support the Secular Atheistic established governments of the United States, while some conservatives and so called Christians do.
The U.S. Constitution supports religious tolerance, not the religious intolerance that you and the ACLU seem to display.