<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scalia Debates ACLU</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:12:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MsUnderestimated</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-57207</link>
		<dc:creator>MsUnderestimated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Oct 2006 02:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/#comment-57207</guid>
		<description>http://www.msunderestimated.com/2006/10/18/scalia-vs-aclu-president-video/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.msunderestimated.com/2006/10/18/scalia-vs-aclu-president-video/" rel="nofollow">http://www.msunderestimated.com/2006/10/18/scalia-vs-aclu-president-video/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right Wing Nation &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; Stop The ACLU Blogburst</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-57219</link>
		<dc:creator>Right Wing Nation &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; Stop The ACLU Blogburst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 13:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/#comment-57219</guid>
		<description>[...] This week the ACLU held its 2006 membership conference. Over 1,500 moonbats from across the U.S. gathered to listen to the ACLU alarmist exaggerations and lies. The event was televised on CSPAN and there were some interesting moments such as when Justice Scalia slam dunked Nadine Strossen in a debate about the bill of rights. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This week the ACLU held its 2006 membership conference. Over 1,500 moonbats from across the U.S. gathered to listen to the ACLU alarmist exaggerations and lies. The event was televised on CSPAN and there were some interesting moments such as when Justice Scalia slam dunked Nadine Strossen in a debate about the bill of rights. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-57215</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 04:51:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/#comment-57215</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ACLU Get Out The Vote&lt;/strong&gt;

Crossposted from STACLU This week the ACLU held its 2006 membership conference. Over 1,500 moonbats from across the U.S. gathered to listen to the ACLU alarmist exaggerations and lies. The event was televised on CSPAN and there were some interesting...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ACLU Get Out The Vote</strong></p>
<p>Crossposted from STACLU This week the ACLU held its 2006 membership conference. Over 1,500 moonbats from across the U.S. gathered to listen to the ACLU alarmist exaggerations and lies. The event was televised on CSPAN and there were some interesting&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucky To Have Justice Scalia &#38;#38;laquo; Colorado Right</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-57218</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucky To Have Justice Scalia &#38;#38;laquo; Colorado Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 16:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/#comment-57218</guid>
		<description>[...] From Stop the ACLU:  Justice Antonin Scalia on Sunday defended some of his Supreme Court opinions, arguing that nothing in the Constitution supports abortion rights and the use of race in school admissions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From Stop the ACLU:  Justice Antonin Scalia on Sunday defended some of his Supreme Court opinions, arguing that nothing in the Constitution supports abortion rights and the use of race in school admissions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; The Definition of an Unfair Fight</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-57216</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; The Definition of an Unfair Fight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:37:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/#comment-57216</guid>
		<description>[...] Antonin Scalia debates the ACLU and, not much to anybody&#38;#8217;s surprise, eats their sack lunch, slaps them around like redheaded stepchildren, spanks them with an oversized ClueBat and sends them crying home to momma. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Antonin Scalia debates the ACLU and, not much to anybody&#38;#38;#8217;s surprise, eats their sack lunch, slaps them around like redheaded stepchildren, spanks them with an oversized ClueBat and sends them crying home to momma. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kerwin_brown</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-57208</link>
		<dc:creator>kerwin_brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/#comment-57208</guid>
		<description>Jay: “Strossen countered that such a legal approach would have barred the landmark 1954 ruling in Brown v. Board of Education,”

My response:

For belonging to an organization that has so many lawyers, Ms. Strossen showed ignorance of the law.  Brown v. The Board of Education overturned a previous Supreme Court case called Plessy v Fergunson, from which a ex slave owning Justice dissented because he stated the U.S. Constitution did not justify prejudice based on race.

If she actually read the U.S. Constitution instead of quoting liberal talking points then she might notice the part that states “in order to form a more perfect union”.  I question how allowing the union to be divided along racial lines make it a more perfect union.

The Fourteenth Amendment itself overturned the Supreme Court case known as Dred Scott v. Sandford which was an activist ruling than was part of the cause of the American Civil War.  It also put the force of law behind the Civil Rights Acts that were passed by Congress.  The Civil Rights Act of 1875 guaranteed Backs the same treatment as Whites in certain public places.   In short the separate but equal was just more garbage put out by an activist court.

There have been activist conservative Supreme Courts in the past which tend to favor big business.  One such decided the corporation were persons under the Fourteenth Amendment.  I don’t remember a corporation being born.  Does anyone else.  The Slaughterhouse Cases decided that Blacks had more rights than Whites though it seems the idea only applied when it was Whites that were being badly treated by corporations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay: “Strossen countered that such a legal approach would have barred the landmark 1954 ruling in Brown v. Board of Education,”</p>
<p>My response:</p>
<p>For belonging to an organization that has so many lawyers, Ms. Strossen showed ignorance of the law.  Brown v. The Board of Education overturned a previous Supreme Court case called Plessy v Fergunson, from which a ex slave owning Justice dissented because he stated the U.S. Constitution did not justify prejudice based on race.</p>
<p>If she actually read the U.S. Constitution instead of quoting liberal talking points then she might notice the part that states “in order to form a more perfect union”.  I question how allowing the union to be divided along racial lines make it a more perfect union.</p>
<p>The Fourteenth Amendment itself overturned the Supreme Court case known as Dred Scott v. Sandford which was an activist ruling than was part of the cause of the American Civil War.  It also put the force of law behind the Civil Rights Acts that were passed by Congress.  The Civil Rights Act of 1875 guaranteed Backs the same treatment as Whites in certain public places.   In short the separate but equal was just more garbage put out by an activist court.</p>
<p>There have been activist conservative Supreme Courts in the past which tend to favor big business.  One such decided the corporation were persons under the Fourteenth Amendment.  I don’t remember a corporation being born.  Does anyone else.  The Slaughterhouse Cases decided that Blacks had more rights than Whites though it seems the idea only applied when it was Whites that were being badly treated by corporations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Positive Liberty &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; Scalia Debates Strossen</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-57217</link>
		<dc:creator>Positive Liberty &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; Scalia Debates Strossen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/#comment-57217</guid>
		<description>[...] Justice Scalia participated in a televised debate with Nadine Strossen, President of the ACLU&#38;#8217;s board of directors, last night. The AP has a report about it, and there&#38;#8217;s one statement in it that caught my eye, and the eye of STACLU as well.  Arguing that liberal judges in the past improperly established new political rights such as abortion, Scalia warned, &#38;#8220;Someday, you&#38;#8217;re going to get a very conservative Supreme Court and regret that approach.&#38;#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Justice Scalia participated in a televised debate with Nadine Strossen, President of the ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s board of directors, last night. The AP has a report about it, and there&#38;#38;#8217;s one statement in it that caught my eye, and the eye of STACLU as well.  Arguing that liberal judges in the past improperly established new political rights such as abortion, Scalia warned, &#38;#38;#8220;Someday, you&#38;#38;#8217;re going to get a very conservative Supreme Court and regret that approach.&#38;#38;#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scalia, ACLU Head Face Off in TV Debate &#38;#38;laquo; Morning Coffee</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-57209</link>
		<dc:creator>Scalia, ACLU Head Face Off in TV Debate &#38;#38;laquo; Morning Coffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:32:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/#comment-57209</guid>
		<description>[...] Stop the ACLU [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stop the ACLU [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iowa Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-57210</link>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/#comment-57210</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Scalia, ACLU Go Head To Head&lt;/strong&gt;

I think Scalia had them at &quot;hello&quot;:

Justice Antonin Scalia on Sunday defended some of his Supreme Court opinions, arguing that nothing in the Constitution supports abortion rights and the use of race in school admissions.

Scalia, a leading con...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Scalia, ACLU Go Head To Head</strong></p>
<p>I think Scalia had them at &#8220;hello&#8221;:</p>
<p>Justice Antonin Scalia on Sunday defended some of his Supreme Court opinions, arguing that nothing in the Constitution supports abortion rights and the use of race in school admissions.</p>
<p>Scalia, a leading con&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/comment-page-1/#comment-57211</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/10/15/scalia-debates-aclu/#comment-57211</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Scalia debates head of ACLU on TV

&lt;/strong&gt;

Justice Antonin Scalia on Sunday defended some of his Supreme Court opinions, arguing that nothing i</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Scalia debates head of ACLU on TV</p>
<p></strong></p>
<p>Justice Antonin Scalia on Sunday defended some of his Supreme Court opinions, arguing that nothing i</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
