Marbury v. Madison was a case that gave the federal judiciary the power of judicial review, a power not specifically mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, and one Thomas Jefferson called them tyrants for giving themselves.

Congress, if they so desire, can override a Supreme Court ruling by simply impeaching those Justices that made it. I forget, but it may actually be easier than overriding a Presidential veto. They also have the power to regulate the federal courts or restructure the inferior courts. The federal courts are therefore more careful with Congress than with the state legislatures.

Try reading marbury v. madison.

An obviously mean single and respecting obviously means favoring so it means Congress should make no law respecting a single establishment of religion which tells us quite a bit before we even figure out what establishment of religion means.

The courts can if they choose to, ignore Congress’ intent for laws they write, so I do not even know if your suggestion would work. I guess it is worth a try but a rebuke of the judiciary by Congress might be more effective and preventing activist judges from getting on the bench even more so.

It is being proposed that we use a corrupt Congress and courts that screwed it up, to correct what the constitutional framers got right in the first place.

The bottom line is “the people” are not holding the “elected representatives” accountable. In many cases, we are doing the same thing with the courts.

Rather than meddle with what the framers got right, I would rather continue to fight those who continue to subvert it.