<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Woman Says ACLU Attorney Pushed Her To Have Abortion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:04:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BuzzTracker.com</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-56155</link>
		<dc:creator>BuzzTracker.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/#comment-56155</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Featured on BuzzTracker&lt;/strong&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Featured on BuzzTracker</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Divorce attorneys maryland - Shared Parenting Helps Women, Too &#124; Family Divorce Attorney - Divorce Lawyer - Divorce Advice - Divorce Attorney - Marriage Couselling</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-56154</link>
		<dc:creator>Divorce attorneys maryland - Shared Parenting Helps Women, Too &#124; Family Divorce Attorney - Divorce Lawyer - Divorce Advice - Divorce Attorney - Marriage Couselling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 19:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/#comment-56154</guid>
		<description>[...] Woman Says ACLU Attorney Pushed Her To Have AbortionStop the ACLU,&#38;nbsp;PA&#38;nbsp;- Sep 27, 2006&#38;#8230; regaining custody of her children and a divorce from her husband. She said she was taken advantage of by an aggressive self-serving attorney, Margie Pitts &#38;#8230;    Filed under divorce attorney by .  Permalink &#38;bull;&#38;nbsp;Print &#38;bull;&#38;nbsp;Email [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Woman Says ACLU Attorney Pushed Her To Have AbortionStop the ACLU,&#38;#38;nbsp;PA&#38;#38;nbsp;- Sep 27, 2006&#38;#38;#8230; regaining custody of her children and a divorce from her husband. She said she was taken advantage of by an aggressive self-serving attorney, Margie Pitts &#38;#38;#8230;    Filed under divorce attorney by .  Permalink &#38;#38;bull;&#38;#38;nbsp;Print &#38;#38;bull;&#38;#38;nbsp;Email [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cigar Intelligence Agency &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; ACLU: a legacy of hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-56150</link>
		<dc:creator>Cigar Intelligence Agency &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; ACLU: a legacy of hypocrisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 17:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/#comment-56150</guid>
		<description>[...] When it comes to pro-life protesters the ACLU could care less about their free speech rights. As a matter of fact they actively fight against pro-life protesters&#38;#8217; free speech and have even tried RICO lawsuits on them. It is scary to see just how far the ACLU will go for its unrestricted abortion agenda. Free speech definitely takes a backseat to their pro-abortion agenda. They have even listed it as their number one priority pushing the defense of the First Amendment, the alleged heart and soul of the ACLU&#38;#8217;s mission, down to third on the list, after civil rights. But don&#38;#8217;t just take my word for it, listen to the words of a former Executive Director: The right to express unpopular opinions, advocate despised ideas and display graphic images is something the ACLU has steadfastly defended for all of its nearly 80-year history. But the ACLU, a group for which I proudly worked as executive director of the Florida and Utah affiliates for more than 10 years, has developed a blind spot when it comes to defending anti-abortion protesters. The organization that once defended the right of a neo-Nazi group to demonstrate in heavily Jewish Skokie, Ill., now cheers a Portland, Ore., jury that charged a group of anti-abortion activists with $107 million in damages for expressing their views. Gushed the ACLU&#38;#8217;s press release: &#38;#8220;We view the jury&#38;#8217;s verdict as a clarion call to remove violence and the threat of violence from the political debate over abortion.&#38;#8221; Were the anti-abortion activists on trial accused of violence? No. Did they threaten violence? Not as the ACLU or Supreme Court usually defines it, when in the context of a call for social change. The activists posted a Web site dripping with animated blood and titled &#38;#8220;The Nuremberg Files,&#38;#8221; after the German city where the Nazis were tried for their crimes. Comparing abortion to Nazi atrocities, the site collected dossiers on abortion doctors, whom they called &#38;#8220;baby butchers.&#38;#8221; &#38;#8230; This is ugly, scary stuff. But it is no worse than neo-Nazi calls for the annihilation of the Jewish people, or a college student posting his rape fantasies about a fellow coed on the Web, both of which the ACLU has defended in the past. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When it comes to pro-life protesters the ACLU could care less about their free speech rights. As a matter of fact they actively fight against pro-life protesters&#38;#38;#8217; free speech and have even tried RICO lawsuits on them. It is scary to see just how far the ACLU will go for its unrestricted abortion agenda. Free speech definitely takes a backseat to their pro-abortion agenda. They have even listed it as their number one priority pushing the defense of the First Amendment, the alleged heart and soul of the ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s mission, down to third on the list, after civil rights. But don&#38;#38;#8217;t just take my word for it, listen to the words of a former Executive Director: The right to express unpopular opinions, advocate despised ideas and display graphic images is something the ACLU has steadfastly defended for all of its nearly 80-year history. But the ACLU, a group for which I proudly worked as executive director of the Florida and Utah affiliates for more than 10 years, has developed a blind spot when it comes to defending anti-abortion protesters. The organization that once defended the right of a neo-Nazi group to demonstrate in heavily Jewish Skokie, Ill., now cheers a Portland, Ore., jury that charged a group of anti-abortion activists with $107 million in damages for expressing their views. Gushed the ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s press release: &#38;#38;#8220;We view the jury&#38;#38;#8217;s verdict as a clarion call to remove violence and the threat of violence from the political debate over abortion.&#38;#38;#8221; Were the anti-abortion activists on trial accused of violence? No. Did they threaten violence? Not as the ACLU or Supreme Court usually defines it, when in the context of a call for social change. The activists posted a Web site dripping with animated blood and titled &#38;#38;#8220;The Nuremberg Files,&#38;#38;#8221; after the German city where the Nazis were tried for their crimes. Comparing abortion to Nazi atrocities, the site collected dossiers on abortion doctors, whom they called &#38;#38;#8220;baby butchers.&#38;#38;#8221; &#38;#38;#8230; This is ugly, scary stuff. But it is no worse than neo-Nazi calls for the annihilation of the Jewish people, or a college student posting his rape fantasies about a fellow coed on the Web, both of which the ACLU has defended in the past. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kerwin_brown</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-56149</link>
		<dc:creator>kerwin_brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/#comment-56149</guid>
		<description>A lot of people find legal documents confusing and hire lawyers to translate them.  If the lawyer is corrupt then these people will end up signing just about anything.  I am not sure if I can blame her.  She may well have been a individual who did not have the skills to exert who own opinions.  It is a trait that allows people to be sold things they don&#039;t need and don&#039;t want by aggressive salespeople.

	Both her parents and the ACLU were pushing for the abortion which is probably comparative to an aggressive salesperson.  The question is could her lawyer have reasonably know that she did not support the case.  Another question is how many woman are coerced into getting an abortion because they do not have the gumption to stand up for their right to preserve the life of their child.  I bet you teens are even more prone to give into pressure from an adult they trust such as their boyfriend or their boyfriend’s  mother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of people find legal documents confusing and hire lawyers to translate them.  If the lawyer is corrupt then these people will end up signing just about anything.  I am not sure if I can blame her.  She may well have been a individual who did not have the skills to exert who own opinions.  It is a trait that allows people to be sold things they don&#8217;t need and don&#8217;t want by aggressive salespeople.</p>
<p>	Both her parents and the ACLU were pushing for the abortion which is probably comparative to an aggressive salesperson.  The question is could her lawyer have reasonably know that she did not support the case.  Another question is how many woman are coerced into getting an abortion because they do not have the gumption to stand up for their right to preserve the life of their child.  I bet you teens are even more prone to give into pressure from an adult they trust such as their boyfriend or their boyfriend’s  mother.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Y.A.C.R.W.B&#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; ACLU: A Legacy Of Hypocrisy</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-56144</link>
		<dc:creator>Y.A.C.R.W.B&#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; ACLU: A Legacy Of Hypocrisy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/#comment-56144</guid>
		<description>[...] After spending 23 years on the ACLU board, the ?defenders of free speech? issued gag orders to him, not to speak about the issue. Now thats free speech for you. When it comes to free speech the ACLU claim to be its most steadfast defender. Now, I am not an absolutist on unlimited free speech. However, most people would think that an organization arguing for hate cults to protest with &#38;#8220;God Hates Fags&#38;#8221; signs at military funerals, neo nazis to march through Jewish neighborhoods, and that child porn distribution is protected by the First Amendment are about as absolutist as it gets. Not so! When it comes to pro-life protesters the ACLU could care less about their free speech rights. As a matter of fact they actively fight against pro-life protesters&#38;#8217; free speech and have even tried RICO lawsuits on them. It is scary to see just how far the ACLU will go for its unrestricted abortion agenda. Free speech definitely takes a backseat to their pro-abortion agenda. They have even listed it as their number one priority pushing the defense of the First Amendment, the alleged heart and soul of the ACLU?s mission, down to third on the list, after civil rights. But don&#38;#8217;t just take my word for it, listen to the words of a former Execuitve Director: The right to express unpopular opinions, advocate despised ideas and display graphic images is something the ACLU has steadfastly defended for all of its nearly 80-year history. But the ACLU, a group for which I proudly worked as executive director of the Florida and Utah affiliates for more than 10 years, has developed a blind spot when it comes to defending anti-abortion protesters. The organization that once defended the right of a neo-Nazi group to demonstrate in heavily Jewish Skokie, Ill., now cheers a Portland, Ore., jury that charged a group of anti-abortion activists with $107 million in damages for expressing their views. Gushed the ACLU&#38;#8217;s press release: &#38;#8220;We view the jury&#38;#8217;s verdict as a clarion call to remove violence and the threat of violence from the political debate over abortion.&#38;#8221; Were the anti-abortion activists on trial accused of violence? No. Did they threaten violence? Not as the ACLU or Supreme Court usually defines it, when in the context of a call for social change. The activists posted a Web site dripping with animated blood and titled &#38;#8220;The Nuremberg Files,&#38;#8221; after the German city where the Nazis were tried for their crimes. Comparing abortion to Nazi atrocities, the site collected dossiers on abortion doctors, whom they called &#38;#8220;baby butchers.&#38;#8221; &#38;#8230; This is ugly, scary stuff. But it is no worse than neo-Nazi calls for the annihilation of the Jewish people, or a college student posting his rape fantasies about a fellow coed on the Web, both of which the ACLU has defended in the past. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After spending 23 years on the ACLU board, the ?defenders of free speech? issued gag orders to him, not to speak about the issue. Now thats free speech for you. When it comes to free speech the ACLU claim to be its most steadfast defender. Now, I am not an absolutist on unlimited free speech. However, most people would think that an organization arguing for hate cults to protest with &#38;#38;#8220;God Hates Fags&#38;#38;#8221; signs at military funerals, neo nazis to march through Jewish neighborhoods, and that child porn distribution is protected by the First Amendment are about as absolutist as it gets. Not so! When it comes to pro-life protesters the ACLU could care less about their free speech rights. As a matter of fact they actively fight against pro-life protesters&#38;#38;#8217; free speech and have even tried RICO lawsuits on them. It is scary to see just how far the ACLU will go for its unrestricted abortion agenda. Free speech definitely takes a backseat to their pro-abortion agenda. They have even listed it as their number one priority pushing the defense of the First Amendment, the alleged heart and soul of the ACLU?s mission, down to third on the list, after civil rights. But don&#38;#38;#8217;t just take my word for it, listen to the words of a former Execuitve Director: The right to express unpopular opinions, advocate despised ideas and display graphic images is something the ACLU has steadfastly defended for all of its nearly 80-year history. But the ACLU, a group for which I proudly worked as executive director of the Florida and Utah affiliates for more than 10 years, has developed a blind spot when it comes to defending anti-abortion protesters. The organization that once defended the right of a neo-Nazi group to demonstrate in heavily Jewish Skokie, Ill., now cheers a Portland, Ore., jury that charged a group of anti-abortion activists with $107 million in damages for expressing their views. Gushed the ACLU&#38;#38;#8217;s press release: &#38;#38;#8220;We view the jury&#38;#38;#8217;s verdict as a clarion call to remove violence and the threat of violence from the political debate over abortion.&#38;#38;#8221; Were the anti-abortion activists on trial accused of violence? No. Did they threaten violence? Not as the ACLU or Supreme Court usually defines it, when in the context of a call for social change. The activists posted a Web site dripping with animated blood and titled &#38;#38;#8220;The Nuremberg Files,&#38;#38;#8221; after the German city where the Nazis were tried for their crimes. Comparing abortion to Nazi atrocities, the site collected dossiers on abortion doctors, whom they called &#38;#38;#8220;baby butchers.&#38;#38;#8221; &#38;#38;#8230; This is ugly, scary stuff. But it is no worse than neo-Nazi calls for the annihilation of the Jewish people, or a college student posting his rape fantasies about a fellow coed on the Web, both of which the ACLU has defended in the past. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: das heize (info4beer)</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-56151</link>
		<dc:creator>das heize (info4beer)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/#comment-56151</guid>
		<description>I do find this surprising and odd.  Why would the ACLU minimize the potential for more kiddie porn stars?  The ACLU is the single biggest supporter and champion of NAMBLA; therefore one must assume the majority of ACLU members are child molesters as well, the rest just view kiddie porn on the net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do find this surprising and odd.  Why would the ACLU minimize the potential for more kiddie porn stars?  The ACLU is the single biggest supporter and champion of NAMBLA; therefore one must assume the majority of ACLU members are child molesters as well, the rest just view kiddie porn on the net.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-56152</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/#comment-56152</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ACLU Hypocrisy Files&lt;/strong&gt;
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: In case you haven&#039;t heard, a group of dissenters from the ACLU are rebelling and calling for a change in the current leadership of the main organization. The summary of things this new group is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ACLU Hypocrisy Files</strong><br />
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: In case you haven&#8217;t heard, a group of dissenters from the ACLU are rebelling and calling for a change in the current leadership of the main organization. The summary of things this new group is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xtreme Right Wing. Scratching the Rash of Liberalism!</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-56153</link>
		<dc:creator>Xtreme Right Wing. Scratching the Rash of Liberalism!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/#comment-56153</guid>
		<description>[...] When it comes to pro-life protesters the ACLU could care less about their free speech rights. As a matter of fact they actively fight against pro-life protesters&#38;#8217; free speech and have even tried RICO lawsuits on them. It is scary to see just how far the ACLU will go for its unrestricted abortion agenda. Free speech definitely takes a backseat to their pro-abortion agenda. They have even listed it as their number one priority pushing the defense of the First Amendment, the alleged heart and soul of the ACLU’s mission, down to third on the list, after civil rights. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When it comes to pro-life protesters the ACLU could care less about their free speech rights. As a matter of fact they actively fight against pro-life protesters&#38;#38;#8217; free speech and have even tried RICO lawsuits on them. It is scary to see just how far the ACLU will go for its unrestricted abortion agenda. Free speech definitely takes a backseat to their pro-abortion agenda. They have even listed it as their number one priority pushing the defense of the First Amendment, the alleged heart and soul of the ACLU’s mission, down to third on the list, after civil rights. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apostle</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-56145</link>
		<dc:creator>apostle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 19:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/#comment-56145</guid>
		<description>I can believe it. Although I grieve for the woman however, Jay, I gotta say I agree with Jeff that the whole &quot;this wasn&#039;t my decision&quot; attitude she is portraying is rather ridiculous. But you are right that a young woman in a situation like that could easily be taken advantage of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can believe it. Although I grieve for the woman however, Jay, I gotta say I agree with Jeff that the whole &#8220;this wasn&#8217;t my decision&#8221; attitude she is portraying is rather ridiculous. But you are right that a young woman in a situation like that could easily be taken advantage of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/comment-page-1/#comment-56146</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/woman-says-aclu-attorney-pushed-her-to-have-abortion/#comment-56146</guid>
		<description>Just keep in mind this was a young woman in the 70&#039;s in a difficult situation.  Many young people get taken advantage of and learn the hard way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just keep in mind this was a young woman in the 70&#8217;s in a difficult situation.  Many young people get taken advantage of and learn the hard way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
