Comments on: ACLU Gets Kentucky Law Barring Funeral Protests Nixed http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:56:13 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: BuzzTracker.com http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/comment-page-1/#comment-56169 BuzzTracker.com Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:29:59 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/#comment-56169 <strong>Featured on BuzzTracker</strong> Featured on BuzzTracker

]]> By: kerwin_brown http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/comment-page-1/#comment-56166 kerwin_brown Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:25:29 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/#comment-56166 That is Amendment 9 and not Article 9. Sorry for the mistake. That is Amendment 9 and not Article 9. Sorry for the mistake.

]]> By: kerwin_brown http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/comment-page-1/#comment-56165 kerwin_brown Fri, 29 Sep 2006 18:23:53 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/#comment-56165 Paul Yanna, Yes it is if you read the Article 9 of the U.S. Constitution which says that the rights in the U.S. Constitution are not to have precedence over the rights not written within and the U.S. Declaration of Independence that mentions the right to pursue happiness. Paul Yanna,

Yes it is if you read the Article 9 of the U.S. Constitution which says that the rights in the U.S. Constitution are not to have precedence over the rights not written within and the U.S. Declaration of Independence that mentions the right to pursue happiness.

]]> By: Paul Yanna http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/comment-page-1/#comment-56157 Paul Yanna Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:21:56 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/#comment-56157 "Right to pursue happiness by grieving in peace" This is a right guaranteed by the Constitution? And what is "the long hull"? “Right to pursue happiness by grieving in peace”

This is a right guaranteed by the Constitution? And what is “the long hull”?

]]> By: kerwin_brown http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/comment-page-1/#comment-56167 kerwin_brown Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:26:34 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/#comment-56167 I believe the ACLU has backed a protest zones at abortion clinics. Protest zones are considered constitutional but their size has been reduced on occasion. The judge in this case is most likely ruling according to precedent. This is a case of the right to liberty issue of Free Speech v. Right to pursue happiness by grieving in peace. I do not know if 300' is needed to ensure the individuals in the funeral are ensured a reasonable right to give for their lost loved one or acquaintance. I am still convinced the ACLU is an anarchistic organization that is trying to stir up trouble in hopes of causing the government to collapse over the long hull. They are not fond of organized religions either except those that seem to be causing trouble. I believe the ACLU has backed a protest zones at abortion clinics.

Protest zones are considered constitutional but their size has been reduced on occasion. The judge in this case is most likely ruling according to precedent.

This is a case of the right to liberty issue of Free Speech v. Right to pursue happiness by grieving in peace. I do not know if 300′ is needed to ensure the individuals in the funeral are ensured a reasonable right to give for their lost loved one or acquaintance.

I am still convinced the ACLU is an anarchistic organization that is trying to stir up trouble in hopes of causing the government to collapse over the long hull. They are not fond of organized religions either except those that seem to be causing trouble.

]]> By: Revealing The ACLU - Standing Up Against the Greatest Overt Attack in American History &#38;#187; ACLU: A Legacy Of Hypocrisy http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/comment-page-1/#comment-56158 Revealing The ACLU - Standing Up Against the Greatest Overt Attack in American History &#38;#187; ACLU: A Legacy Of Hypocrisy Thu, 28 Sep 2006 11:37:56 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/#comment-56158 [...] After spending 23 years on the ACLU board, the ?defenders of free speech? issued gag orders to him, not to speak about the issue. Now thats free speech for you. When it comes to free speech the ACLU claim to be its most steadfast defender. Now, I am not an absolutist on unlimited free speech. However, most people would think that an organization arguing for hate cults to protest with &#8220;God Hates Fags&#8221; signs at military funerals, neo nazis to march through Jewish neighborhoods, and that child porn distribution is protected by the First Amendment are about as absolutist as it gets. Not so! When it comes to pro-life protesters the ACLU could care less about their free speech rights. As a matter of fact they actively fight against pro-life protesters&#8217; free speech and have even tried RICO lawsuits on them. It is scary to see just how far the ACLU will go for its unrestricted abortion agenda. Free speech definitely takes a backseat to their pro-abortion agenda. They have even listed it as their number one priority pushing the defense of the First Amendment, the alleged heart and soul of the ACLU?s mission, down to third on the list, after civil rights. But don&#8217;t just take my word for it, listen to the words of a former Execuitve Director: The right to express unpopular opinions, advocate despised ideas and display graphic images is something the ACLU has steadfastly defended for all of its nearly 80-year history. But the ACLU, a group for which I proudly worked as executive director of the Florida and Utah affiliates for more than 10 years, has developed a blind spot when it comes to defending anti-abortion protesters. The organization that once defended the right of a neo-Nazi group to demonstrate in heavily Jewish Skokie, Ill., now cheers a Portland, Ore., jury that charged a group of anti-abortion activists with $107 million in damages for expressing their views. Gushed the ACLU&#8217;s press release: &#8220;We view the jury&#8217;s verdict as a clarion call to remove violence and the threat of violence from the political debate over abortion.&#8221; Were the anti-abortion activists on trial accused of violence? No. Did they threaten violence? Not as the ACLU or Supreme Court usually defines it, when in the context of a call for social change. The activists posted a Web site dripping with animated blood and titled &#8220;The Nuremberg Files,&#8221; after the German city where the Nazis were tried for their crimes. Comparing abortion to Nazi atrocities, the site collected dossiers on abortion doctors, whom they called &#8220;baby butchers.&#8221; &#8230; This is ugly, scary stuff. But it is no worse than neo-Nazi calls for the annihilation of the Jewish people, or a college student posting his rape fantasies about a fellow coed on the Web, both of which the ACLU has defended in the past. [...] [...] After spending 23 years on the ACLU board, the ?defenders of free speech? issued gag orders to him, not to speak about the issue. Now thats free speech for you. When it comes to free speech the ACLU claim to be its most steadfast defender. Now, I am not an absolutist on unlimited free speech. However, most people would think that an organization arguing for hate cults to protest with &#38;#8220;God Hates Fags&#38;#8221; signs at military funerals, neo nazis to march through Jewish neighborhoods, and that child porn distribution is protected by the First Amendment are about as absolutist as it gets. Not so! When it comes to pro-life protesters the ACLU could care less about their free speech rights. As a matter of fact they actively fight against pro-life protesters&#38;#8217; free speech and have even tried RICO lawsuits on them. It is scary to see just how far the ACLU will go for its unrestricted abortion agenda. Free speech definitely takes a backseat to their pro-abortion agenda. They have even listed it as their number one priority pushing the defense of the First Amendment, the alleged heart and soul of the ACLU?s mission, down to third on the list, after civil rights. But don&#38;#8217;t just take my word for it, listen to the words of a former Execuitve Director: The right to express unpopular opinions, advocate despised ideas and display graphic images is something the ACLU has steadfastly defended for all of its nearly 80-year history. But the ACLU, a group for which I proudly worked as executive director of the Florida and Utah affiliates for more than 10 years, has developed a blind spot when it comes to defending anti-abortion protesters. The organization that once defended the right of a neo-Nazi group to demonstrate in heavily Jewish Skokie, Ill., now cheers a Portland, Ore., jury that charged a group of anti-abortion activists with $107 million in damages for expressing their views. Gushed the ACLU&#38;#8217;s press release: &#38;#8220;We view the jury&#38;#8217;s verdict as a clarion call to remove violence and the threat of violence from the political debate over abortion.&#38;#8221; Were the anti-abortion activists on trial accused of violence? No. Did they threaten violence? Not as the ACLU or Supreme Court usually defines it, when in the context of a call for social change. The activists posted a Web site dripping with animated blood and titled &#38;#8220;The Nuremberg Files,&#38;#8221; after the German city where the Nazis were tried for their crimes. Comparing abortion to Nazi atrocities, the site collected dossiers on abortion doctors, whom they called &#38;#8220;baby butchers.&#38;#8221; &#38;#8230; This is ugly, scary stuff. But it is no worse than neo-Nazi calls for the annihilation of the Jewish people, or a college student posting his rape fantasies about a fellow coed on the Web, both of which the ACLU has defended in the past. [...]

]]> By: Conservative Culture &#38;#187; Blogburst - ACLU&#38;#8217;s Hypocricy Legacy http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/comment-page-1/#comment-56163 Conservative Culture &#38;#187; Blogburst - ACLU&#38;#8217;s Hypocricy Legacy Thu, 28 Sep 2006 02:15:13 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/#comment-56163 [...] When it comes to free speech the ACLU claim to be its most steadfast defender. Now, I am not an absolutist on unlimited free speech. However, most people would think that an organization arguing for hate cults to protest with &#8220;God Hates Fags&#8221; signs at military funerals, neo nazis to march through Jewish neighborhoods, and that child porn distribution is protected by the First Amendment are about as absolutist as it gets. Not so! [...] [...] When it comes to free speech the ACLU claim to be its most steadfast defender. Now, I am not an absolutist on unlimited free speech. However, most people would think that an organization arguing for hate cults to protest with &#38;#8220;God Hates Fags&#38;#8221; signs at military funerals, neo nazis to march through Jewish neighborhoods, and that child porn distribution is protected by the First Amendment are about as absolutist as it gets. Not so! [...]

]]> By: Conservative Thinking http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/comment-page-1/#comment-56162 Conservative Thinking Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:51:00 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/#comment-56162 <strong>ACLU Hypocrisy Files</strong> Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: In case you haven't heard, a group of dissenters from the ACLU are rebelling and calling for a change in the current leadership of the main organization. The summary of things this new group is... ACLU Hypocrisy Files
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU: In case you haven’t heard, a group of dissenters from the ACLU are rebelling and calling for a change in the current leadership of the main organization. The summary of things this new group is…

]]> By: Xtreme Right Wing. Scratching the Rash of Liberalism! http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/comment-page-1/#comment-56164 Xtreme Right Wing. Scratching the Rash of Liberalism! Thu, 28 Sep 2006 01:40:41 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/#comment-56164 [...] When it comes to free speech the ACLU claim to be its most steadfast defender. Now, I am not an absolutist on unlimited free speech. However, most people would think that an organization arguing for hate cults to protest with &#8220;God Hates Fags&#8221; signs at military funerals, neo nazis to march through Jewish neighborhoods, and that child porn distribution is protected by the First Amendment are about as absolutist as it gets. Not so! [...] [...] When it comes to free speech the ACLU claim to be its most steadfast defender. Now, I am not an absolutist on unlimited free speech. However, most people would think that an organization arguing for hate cults to protest with &#38;#8220;God Hates Fags&#38;#8221; signs at military funerals, neo nazis to march through Jewish neighborhoods, and that child porn distribution is protected by the First Amendment are about as absolutist as it gets. Not so! [...]

]]> By: Jeff Molby http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/comment-page-1/#comment-56168 Jeff Molby Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:58:46 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/27/aclu-gets-kentucky-law-barring-funeral-protests-nixed/#comment-56168 Apostle, You're right that they don't have a right to protest on the cemetary grounds, but it's up to the cemetary to ask them to leave. Also, if they are outside of the cemetary on public grounds, they do have the right to protest. Apostle,

You’re right that they don’t have a right to protest on the cemetary grounds, but it’s up to the cemetary to ask them to leave. Also, if they are outside of the cemetary on public grounds, they do have the right to protest.

]]>