Comments on: DRUDGE: Clinton Meltdown? Or Savvy Political Positioning? (AUDIO)

By: loboinok

loboinok — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:39:44 +0000

So, you tell me that clinton actually was in control for the whole time, having planned this?
Thats not what I said…read it again.

By: Jim

Jim — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:57:01 +0000

It just can’t be that he’s able to respond to a surprise this well.
If Clinton really was “sandbagged,” then that only shows the kind of softball interviews that he’s been getting his whole career. Compare that to the one-hour shellacing that Tim Russert — of LBJ’s administration — gave Bush a couple years ago.

Wallace’s ONE QUESTION was not only fair and obvious, but easy to answer honestly.

By: gfactor

gfactor — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 12:53:27 +0000

“Sandbagged? Clinton agreed to a thirty minute interview, with the stipulation that he would control 15 for his “Global Initiative” and Wallace 15, with nothing off-limits.”

So, you tell me that clinton actually was in control for the whole time, having planned this?

“Too bad his PR guy didn’t see it the way you did. He kept nudging the FOX rep., telling him to kill the interview.”

I’ll admit a PR person would prefer the question and answer don’t get asked. I don’t trust PR people. They’re the types of slime that call this a ‘meltdown.’

By: loboinok

loboinok — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:41:33 +0000

Including clinton being sandbagged.
Sandbagged? Clinton agreed to a thirty minute interview, with the stipulation that he would control 15 for his “Global Initiative” and Wallace 15, with nothing off-limits.

It just can’t be that he’s able to respond to a surprise this well.
Too bad his PR guy didn’t see it the way you did. He kept nudging the FOX rep., telling him to kill the interview.

By: gfactor

gfactor — Tue, 26 Sep 2006 01:05:19 +0000

Wow. Everything must be blamed on clinton. Including clinton being sandbagged.

It just can’t be that he’s able to respond to a surprise this well.