<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACLU Condemn State Department&#8217;s Decision to Deny Visa To Radical Islamic Scholar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/25/aclu-condemn-state-departments-decision-to-deny-visa-to-radical-islamic-scholar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/25/aclu-condemn-state-departments-decision-to-deny-visa-to-radical-islamic-scholar/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:01:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Global Geopolitics News &#38;#38;#187; Global Security News - US State Department contractor killed in rocket attack in Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/25/aclu-condemn-state-departments-decision-to-deny-visa-to-radical-islamic-scholar/comment-page-1/#comment-56036</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Geopolitics News &#38;#38;#187; Global Security News - US State Department contractor killed in rocket attack in Iraq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/25/aclu-condemn-state-departments-decision-to-deny-visa-to-radical-islamic-scholar/#comment-56036</guid>
		<description>[...] ACLU Condemn State Department s Decision to Deny Visa To Radical  Stop the ACLU, PA - Sep 25, 2006  This week, after more than two years of investigating Ramadan and faced with a deadline imposed by the court, the State Department offered a new pretext for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ACLU Condemn State Department s Decision to Deny Visa To Radical  Stop the ACLU, PA &#8211; Sep 25, 2006  This week, after more than two years of investigating Ramadan and faced with a deadline imposed by the court, the State Department offered a new pretext for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIGHT WING HOWLER</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/25/aclu-condemn-state-departments-decision-to-deny-visa-to-radical-islamic-scholar/comment-page-1/#comment-56037</link>
		<dc:creator>RIGHT WING HOWLER</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/25/aclu-condemn-state-departments-decision-to-deny-visa-to-radical-islamic-scholar/#comment-56037</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;THIS SHOULD OUTRAGE YOU!&lt;/strong&gt;
	&#38;nbsp;
	Jay says it best so I will let him plug his own post about how the ACLU is probably the most worthless piece of shiite organization in the US.
	It deals with how the ACLU condemned the State Department for DENYING a visa to a radical Islamic scho...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>THIS SHOULD OUTRAGE YOU!</strong><br />
	&#38;#38;nbsp;<br />
	Jay says it best so I will let him plug his own post about how the ACLU is probably the most worthless piece of shiite organization in the US.<br />
	It deals with how the ACLU condemned the State Department for DENYING a visa to a radical Islamic scho&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kerwin_brown</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/25/aclu-condemn-state-departments-decision-to-deny-visa-to-radical-islamic-scholar/comment-page-1/#comment-56040</link>
		<dc:creator>kerwin_brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/25/aclu-condemn-state-departments-decision-to-deny-visa-to-radical-islamic-scholar/#comment-56040</guid>
		<description>The federal court was an activist court as it ignored both the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court Precedent.  The Supreme Court previously ruled that an person could be excluded because of his anti war viewpoint.  The U.S. Constitution gives the government to act in the common defense and puts no limits on it as regards non citizens.  Treaty and law passed by the federal government is the only limits that exist on non citizens and the later trumps the former.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The federal court was an activist court as it ignored both the U.S. Constitution and Supreme Court Precedent.  The Supreme Court previously ruled that an person could be excluded because of his anti war viewpoint.  The U.S. Constitution gives the government to act in the common defense and puts no limits on it as regards non citizens.  Treaty and law passed by the federal government is the only limits that exist on non citizens and the later trumps the former.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Molby</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/25/aclu-condemn-state-departments-decision-to-deny-visa-to-radical-islamic-scholar/comment-page-1/#comment-56041</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Molby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 02:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/25/aclu-condemn-state-departments-decision-to-deny-visa-to-radical-islamic-scholar/#comment-56041</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know anything about this guy, so I won&#039;t speak to the specifics of the case, but I think I can answer your question in more general terms.

	&lt;blockquote&gt;The real question is why the ACLU wants this guy to teach his anti-American jihadist philosphies to our children.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
	Your choice of wording twists the situation in a subtle, but important way. The true question would be, &quot;Why does the ACLU want to prevent the executive branch of our government from unilaterally preventing an ideological opponent from entering the country?&quot;

	Now, if this man truly does have a history of inciting violence, there is absolutely no reason to allow him in. If, on the other hand, he simply shares the same ideology as those that commit violent acts, we must be very careful before deciding to bar him.

	You see, it&#039;s not &lt;em&gt;his&lt;/em&gt; rights that I care about. What&#039;s really at stake here is &lt;em&gt;our&lt;/em&gt; right to hear opposing viewpoints.

	Again, I&#039;ll concede that I have no idea to what extent this man incites violence, but even if we assume that he does, I still support the ACLU&#039;s attempt to force the administration to bear some burden of proof.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know anything about this guy, so I won&#8217;t speak to the specifics of the case, but I think I can answer your question in more general terms.</p>
<blockquote><p>The real question is why the ACLU wants this guy to teach his anti-American jihadist philosphies to our children.</p></blockquote>
<p>	Your choice of wording twists the situation in a subtle, but important way. The true question would be, &#8220;Why does the ACLU want to prevent the executive branch of our government from unilaterally preventing an ideological opponent from entering the country?&#8221;</p>
<p>	Now, if this man truly does have a history of inciting violence, there is absolutely no reason to allow him in. If, on the other hand, he simply shares the same ideology as those that commit violent acts, we must be very careful before deciding to bar him.</p>
<p>	You see, it&#8217;s not <em>his</em> rights that I care about. What&#8217;s really at stake here is <em>our</em> right to hear opposing viewpoints.</p>
<p>	Again, I&#8217;ll concede that I have no idea to what extent this man incites violence, but even if we assume that he does, I still support the ACLU&#8217;s attempt to force the administration to bear some burden of proof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCMC</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/25/aclu-condemn-state-departments-decision-to-deny-visa-to-radical-islamic-scholar/comment-page-1/#comment-56038</link>
		<dc:creator>DCMC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/25/aclu-condemn-state-departments-decision-to-deny-visa-to-radical-islamic-scholar/#comment-56038</guid>
		<description>Some of Jean-Charles Brisard&#039;s latest findings on Ramadan are at http://www.terrorfinance.org/the_terror_finance_blog/2006/09/tariq_ramadan_n.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of Jean-Charles Brisard&#8217;s latest findings on Ramadan are at <a href="http://www.terrorfinance.org/the_terror_finance_blog/2006/09/tariq_ramadan_n.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.terrorfinance.org/the_terror_finance_blog/2006/09/tariq_ramadan_n.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woman Honor Thyself</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/25/aclu-condemn-state-departments-decision-to-deny-visa-to-radical-islamic-scholar/comment-page-1/#comment-56039</link>
		<dc:creator>Woman Honor Thyself</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 21:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/25/aclu-condemn-state-departments-decision-to-deny-visa-to-radical-islamic-scholar/#comment-56039</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;LipsticK and TerroristS&lt;/strong&gt;
	Ladies, get ready for the $30.00 lipstick!..The government is relaxing its ban against carrying liquids and gels onto airliners&#38;#8230;.

	...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>LipsticK and TerroristS</strong><br />
	Ladies, get ready for the $30.00 lipstick!..The government is relaxing its ban against carrying liquids and gels onto airliners&#38;#38;#8230;.</p>
<p>	&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
