Thanks. I was really hoping for answers to those 12 simple questions. Perhaps I’ll still get them. Perhaps not. But considering that Paul has commented on this site today on other posts I’m leaning toward “perhaps not.” These so called “pro-choice” people are usually nothing of the sort. And they don’t like to have that pointed out.

The question is what the risk factor to the mother is when she takes the murder drug RU486. Hormonal contraceptives of all types are known to kill women by causing blood clots leading to stroke and heart attack but it is considered an expectable loss in order to control population. I guess the reasoning is that dead women don’t give birth to live babies. That reasoning should be no surprise coming from the pro choice to murder crowd.

If he didn’t scare a liberal like you, It would be time for you to stock up on some Tysabri.

Do you support privatizing social security? Should I as a law abiding citizen be able to buy a gun (or multiple guns) if I so choose anytime I want without a 10 day waiting period? If I owned a house that I was going to rent out should I be able not rent it to a foreigner? Or only rent it to a Christian? Or not rent it to a gay person simply because I choose not to? Should I be able to fire a minority from my business without being questioned or called a racist? How about the Boyscouts? Can they as a private organization, be able to choose who they admit based on sexual orientation if they wished? Should a school or other government facility be able to choose to allow or disallow their facilities to be used by the BSA? Should a child be able to choose to pray in school? Even if it’s out loud where GASP! somebody might hear the word Jesus? How about school vouchers so I can choose to send my kids to a good school instead of one of these government run brain rotting facilities?

Or does Pro-Choice only apply to abortion?

People who favor the availability of abortion and abotion drugs are not, despite Jay’s short-sighted quip, “anti-life.” They do not wish ALL pregnancies to be terminated, and many of them have happily given birth themselves.

The difference is neither subtle nor difficult to understand.

Please call the man “Pro-Life” not “Anti-Choice.” Use the name by which the group describes itself.

That’s how polite debate occurs in a Republic.

Pro-Life groups shouldn’t call Pro-Choice forces “Anti-Life.” You wouldn’t like that would you?