Comments on: ACLU Claims Victory: Attorneys Not Required to Sign Terrorism Oaths http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:03:48 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: Conservative Thinking http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-55525 Conservative Thinking Thu, 05 Oct 2006 04:33:12 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/#comment-55525 <strong>ACLU Roots</strong> Crossposted from Stop The ACLU Hat tip: Ban The ACLU This was found on youtube and it's pretty short at 3 minutes. I wish I could find more footage somewhere. It is an accurate account of the ACLU's founding. Does... ACLU Roots
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU Hat tip: Ban The ACLU This was found on youtube and it’s pretty short at 3 minutes. I wish I could find more footage somewhere. It is an accurate account of the ACLU’s founding. Does…

]]> By: ACLU Claims Victory: Attorneys Not Required to Sign | Information on Attorneys http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-55492 ACLU Claims Victory: Attorneys Not Required to Sign | Information on Attorneys Fri, 22 Sep 2006 05:38:05 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/#comment-55492 [...] ACLU Claims Victory: Attorneys Not Required to Sign Terrorism &#8230;Stop the ACLU,&nbsp;PA&nbsp;- Sep 13, 2006Today, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that attorneys seeking to represent indigent clients are no longer required to sign documents swearing that they are not &#8230; [...] [...] ACLU Claims Victory: Attorneys Not Required to Sign Terrorism &#38;#8230;Stop the ACLU,&#38;nbsp;PA&#38;nbsp;- Sep 13, 2006Today, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that attorneys seeking to represent indigent clients are no longer required to sign documents swearing that they are not &#38;#8230; [...]

]]> By: Viva La Blog &#38;#187; The Traitor Lynne Stewart http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-55494 Viva La Blog &#38;#187; The Traitor Lynne Stewart Thu, 21 Sep 2006 03:25:21 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/#comment-55494 [...] Other&#8217;s posting: Theodore&#8217;s World, KP Cubed, Stop the ACLU, The Voice, My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy Apparently, the ACLU doesn&#8217;t feel attorneys should be restricted from treasonous activities. [...] [...] Other&#38;#8217;s posting: Theodore&#38;#8217;s World, KP Cubed, Stop the ACLU, The Voice, My Vast Right Wing Conspiracy Apparently, the ACLU doesn&#38;#8217;t feel attorneys should be restricted from treasonous activities. [...]

]]> By: RIGHT WING HOWLER http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-55493 RIGHT WING HOWLER Sun, 17 Sep 2006 21:45:18 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/#comment-55493 <strong>WHY I HATE THE ACLU</strong> &nbsp; Did you know that in Ohio you can not force any attorney for the ACLU to take a loyalty oath? Think that&#8217;s bad? In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations because they object... WHY I HATE THE ACLU
&#38;nbsp;
Did you know that in Ohio you can not force any attorney for the ACLU to take a loyalty oath?
Think that&#38;#8217;s bad?
In October of 2004, the ACLU turned down $1.15 million in funding from the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations because they object…

]]> By: kerwin_brown http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-55495 kerwin_brown Fri, 15 Sep 2006 07:07:05 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/#comment-55495 Camanintx, You do realize the U.S. Constitution requires that state and federal politicians take a loyalty oath. It is called the constitutional oath. If there was anything different about the McCarthy loyalty oath then please let me know what it was. The best support for those communist goals being accurate as they are or have been put into action. All you need to do is read them and check up on them. I doubt you are open minded enough to do that. Camanintx,

You do realize the U.S. Constitution requires that state and federal politicians take a loyalty oath. It is called the constitutional oath. If there was anything different about the McCarthy loyalty oath then please let me know what it was.

The best support for those communist goals being accurate as they are or have been put into action. All you need to do is read them and check up on them. I doubt you are open minded enough to do that.

]]> By: The Irate Nation - &#38;#187; Stop The ACLU Blogburst http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-55497 The Irate Nation - &#38;#187; Stop The ACLU Blogburst Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:49:20 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/#comment-55497 [...] ACLU &#38; TerrorismCrossposted from Stop The ACLU Via ACLU Today, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that attorneys seeking to represent indigent clients are no longer required to sign documents swearing that they are not terrorists and have no involvement with terrorist groups. The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio had challenged the provision, which is part of the Ohio Patriot Act, calling the requirement unnecessary red tape that will do nothing to prevent terrorism. &ldquo;We are pleased the court recognized that attorneys should not be forced to sign these ineffective and offensive pledges,&rdquo; said ACLU of Ohio Executive Director Christine Link. &ldquo;The Ohio Patriot Act is an assault on the fundamental liberties of all Ohioans. Hopefully, this decision is a stepping stone to reining in this overreaching and flawed law.&rdquo; [...] [...] ACLU &#38;#38; TerrorismCrossposted from Stop The ACLU Via ACLU Today, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that attorneys seeking to represent indigent clients are no longer required to sign documents swearing that they are not terrorists and have no involvement with terrorist groups. The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio had challenged the provision, which is part of the Ohio Patriot Act, calling the requirement unnecessary red tape that will do nothing to prevent terrorism. &#38;ldquo;We are pleased the court recognized that attorneys should not be forced to sign these ineffective and offensive pledges,&#38;rdquo; said ACLU of Ohio Executive Director Christine Link. &#38;ldquo;The Ohio Patriot Act is an assault on the fundamental liberties of all Ohioans. Hopefully, this decision is a stepping stone to reining in this overreaching and flawed law.&#38;rdquo; [...]

]]> By: loboinok http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-55496 loboinok Fri, 15 Sep 2006 05:43:33 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/#comment-55496 <i>Didn’t Senator McCarthy and the Government Operations Committee label people subversives and communist sympathizers based on false evidence and hearsay?</i> McCarthy never released the names of those he suspected. He stated that there were (the numbers vary according to the sources)from 57 to 387 communists in the State Dept and other branches of government. It was widely considered false until the revealing of the 'Venona Project' and the releasing of the Venona papers, which showed considerable communist infiltration of not only the State Dept but many others as well as the White House itself. <i>In your post above, you imply that Dr. Albert Eason Monroe was a communist because he was chairman of the Federation for Repeal of the Levering Act (i.e. loyalty oaths).</i> That paragraph was taken from the Congressional Record. Extension of Remarks of Hon. John H. Rousselot of California In The House Of Representatives Wednesday, September 20, 1961. Concerning Communist front groups. Didn’t Senator McCarthy and the Government Operations Committee label people subversives and communist sympathizers based on false evidence and hearsay?
McCarthy never released the names of those he suspected.

He stated that there were (the numbers vary according to the sources)from 57 to 387 communists in the State Dept and other branches of government.

It was widely considered false until the revealing of the ‘Venona Project’ and the releasing of the Venona papers, which showed considerable communist infiltration of not only the State Dept but many others as well as the White House itself.

In your post above, you imply that Dr. Albert Eason Monroe was a communist because he was chairman of the Federation for Repeal of the Levering Act (i.e. loyalty oaths).
That paragraph was taken from the Congressional Record.
Extension of Remarks of Hon. John H. Rousselot of California In The House Of Representatives Wednesday, September 20, 1961.

Concerning Communist front groups.

]]> By: Woman Honor Thyself http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-55498 Woman Honor Thyself Fri, 15 Sep 2006 04:25:53 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/#comment-55498 <strong>Stop The ACLU Blogburst</strong> Crossposted from: Stop The ACLU Via ACLU Today, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that attorneys seeking to represent indigent clients are no longer required to sign documents swearing that they are not terrorists and have no involvement with terrorist grou... Stop The ACLU Blogburst
Crossposted from: Stop The ACLU
Via ACLU
Today, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that attorneys seeking to represent indigent clients are no longer required to sign documents swearing that they are not terrorists and have no involvement with terrorist grou…

]]> By: Jay http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-55499 Jay Fri, 15 Sep 2006 01:57:28 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/#comment-55499 Don't give me that bull. First of all, we have seen that the ACLU didn't even want to check its clients on a terrorist list. They said, well if we don't look at the list, then we can't "knowingly" represent anyone. Pretty sly. They later recanted on even this. They have a problem knowingly representing a terrorist? Sorry, but that sounds like they are on the wrong side of the war. And also, I didn't say the piece of paper would stop them, but if they signed it they could be prosecuted and imprisoned for perjury when they break their oath. They can be held accountable. Don’t give me that bull. First of all, we have seen that the ACLU didn’t even want to check its clients on a terrorist list. They said, well if we don’t look at the list, then we can’t “knowingly” represent anyone. Pretty sly. They later recanted on even this. They have a problem knowingly representing a terrorist? Sorry, but that sounds like they are on the wrong side of the war.

And also, I didn’t say the piece of paper would stop them, but if they signed it they could be prosecuted and imprisoned for perjury when they break their oath. They can be held accountable.

]]> By: camanintx http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/comment-page-1/#comment-55500 camanintx Fri, 15 Sep 2006 01:52:21 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/13/aclu-claims-victory-attorneys-not-required-to-sign-terrorism-oaths/#comment-55500 Jay, if a lawyer did want to commit a terrorist act or even just abet one, do you think a silly little piece of paper would stop them? One of the bedrocks of our legal system is that everyone, no matter how reviled, is entitled to representation. How can a lawyer provide adequate council when they are afraid that anything they say may be used against them later? Jay, if a lawyer did want to commit a terrorist act or even just abet one, do you think a silly little piece of paper would stop them? One of the bedrocks of our legal system is that everyone, no matter how reviled, is entitled to representation. How can a lawyer provide adequate council when they are afraid that anything they say may be used against them later?

]]>