<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A thoughtful analysis of the shameful Leftocrat lynch mob</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/09/a-thoughtful-analysis-of-the-shameful-leftocrat-lynch-mob/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/09/a-thoughtful-analysis-of-the-shameful-leftocrat-lynch-mob/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 00:04:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bbsnews</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/09/a-thoughtful-analysis-of-the-shameful-leftocrat-lynch-mob/comment-page-1/#comment-55319</link>
		<dc:creator>bbsnews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 05:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/09/a-thoughtful-analysis-of-the-shameful-leftocrat-lynch-mob/#comment-55319</guid>
		<description>&quot;If the Left is so certain that a single TV SHOW can obliterate the narrative they’ve taken so much care to invent, particularly following the thrashing they took in 2004, you have to wonder, “Where’s the beef?”&quot;

	All that has to happen is that the movie, being portrayed as factual, actually be factual. That means not making things up that never happened.

	The right wing cannot have it both ways. The scene where it claims that Clinton was &quot;too distracted&quot; by the Lewinski affair is a case in point. Republicans accused Clinton of staging various responses at that time and they accused him of trying to deflect attention away from the Monica affair. If that was the case, surely the man would have jumped on any pretense to focus world attention on a military intervention to get Bin Laden.

	And of course there are several other examples where the film is reportedly going to simply make things up. Simply fix the factual errors and then run the film.

	Republicans would certainly not like that about their president Bush. I wrote an article today about that pesky Senate report that shows for once and for all that Bush and Cheney have been playing fast and lose with facts so much so that they lied the US into a war and dropped the ball and Bin Laden.

	The sad part is that Republicans are playing directly into Bin Laden&#039;s hands. They are getting moral support from Bin Laden because of their blind support for a fake War on Terror (A real solution would be quiet investigative police work with no publicity until AFTER the terrorist plot is thwarted; not Middle East mlitary intervention that breeds resentment and more damn terrorists. Not the Bush doctrine of fear, Fear, FEAR all the time just in time to scare a win in an election), that is missing little things like that recently negotiated Pakistan border deal where former terrorists can live in peace all safe like.

	It&#039;s a shame that the Republican party has been taken over by charlatans and religious fanatics who will defend lies against truth and risk national security just to stay in power to smack down Gay marriage and stem cell research...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If the Left is so certain that a single TV SHOW can obliterate the narrative they’ve taken so much care to invent, particularly following the thrashing they took in 2004, you have to wonder, “Where’s the beef?”&#8221;</p>
<p>	All that has to happen is that the movie, being portrayed as factual, actually be factual. That means not making things up that never happened.</p>
<p>	The right wing cannot have it both ways. The scene where it claims that Clinton was &#8220;too distracted&#8221; by the Lewinski affair is a case in point. Republicans accused Clinton of staging various responses at that time and they accused him of trying to deflect attention away from the Monica affair. If that was the case, surely the man would have jumped on any pretense to focus world attention on a military intervention to get Bin Laden.</p>
<p>	And of course there are several other examples where the film is reportedly going to simply make things up. Simply fix the factual errors and then run the film.</p>
<p>	Republicans would certainly not like that about their president Bush. I wrote an article today about that pesky Senate report that shows for once and for all that Bush and Cheney have been playing fast and lose with facts so much so that they lied the US into a war and dropped the ball and Bin Laden.</p>
<p>	The sad part is that Republicans are playing directly into Bin Laden&#8217;s hands. They are getting moral support from Bin Laden because of their blind support for a fake War on Terror (A real solution would be quiet investigative police work with no publicity until AFTER the terrorist plot is thwarted; not Middle East mlitary intervention that breeds resentment and more damn terrorists. Not the Bush doctrine of fear, Fear, FEAR all the time just in time to scare a win in an election), that is missing little things like that recently negotiated Pakistan border deal where former terrorists can live in peace all safe like.</p>
<p>	It&#8217;s a shame that the Republican party has been taken over by charlatans and religious fanatics who will defend lies against truth and risk national security just to stay in power to smack down Gay marriage and stem cell research&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Conservative Daily Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/09/09/a-thoughtful-analysis-of-the-shameful-leftocrat-lynch-mob/comment-page-1/#comment-55320</link>
		<dc:creator>American Conservative Daily Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Sep 2006 23:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/09/09/a-thoughtful-analysis-of-the-shameful-leftocrat-lynch-mob/#comment-55320</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;When In Doubt, THREATEN&lt;/strong&gt;
	As a public service, I have translated the letter by the liberal moonbats in Congress to ABC and Mr. Iger into plain English:

	September 7, 2006
	Mr. Robert A. Iger
	President and CEO
	The Walt Disney Company
	500 South Buena Vista Street
	Burbank CA 91</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>When In Doubt, THREATEN</strong><br />
	As a public service, I have translated the letter by the liberal moonbats in Congress to ABC and Mr. Iger into plain English:</p>
<p>	September 7, 2006<br />
	Mr. Robert A. Iger<br />
	President and CEO<br />
	The Walt Disney Company<br />
	500 South Buena Vista Street<br />
	Burbank CA 91</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
