UN backs away from disarming Hezbollah

What is up with the United Nations? Has it been officially confirmed that the United Nations is an appeaser and apologist organization? Are they really in cahoots with Islamofacists based in Lebanon and Gaza, who commit terrorist acts and kill innocent civilians on behalf of their supports and providers; Iran and Syria?

Lets review the the events of last month’s conflicts. Hezbollah and Hamas attacked Israel last month and took hostages. Israel struck back. Hezbollah and Hamas responded by firing thousands of rockets at Israel. Israel countered the rockets. And, the world community said Israel did not have the right to protect itself.

Along came the United Nations and Europe countries to broker a peace treaty and provide the “backbone” of a peacekeeping forces for Lebanon. Today, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan made an outlandish statement that the UN peace keepers will not disarm Hezbollah.

“It is generally accepted that the disarmament of Hezbollah cannot be done by force,” Annan said. “The troops are not going there to disarm Hezbollah, let’s be clear on that.” Source – AP News story courtesy of CBN News Service

To make matters worst, according to the Jerusalem Post, the sponsor of terror in the Middle East, Iran, has moved things up several notches in the past few months. Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad calls for the annihilation of the State of Israel on almost a daily basis.

Giora Eiland, Israel’s former national security adviser, told The Jerusalem Post on Thursday that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, if he ever became the supreme decision maker in his country, would “sacrifice half of Iran for the sake of eliminating Israel,”

Eiland also believes that Ahmadinejad,”has a religious conviction that Israel’s demise is essential to the restoration of Muslim glory, that the Zionist thorn in the heart of the Islamic nations must be removed. And he will pay almost any price to right the perceived historic wrong. Source – Courtesy of The Jerusalem Post: Iran leadership poses threat

Tell me, is there something wrong with this picture or is the United Nations an enabler of terror, fascism, and oppression. This sure is reminiscent to the fascist anti-Semitic workups of the Third Reich almost 60 years ago. And the world community sits by making apologist and appeaser solutions. The UN and world community sits back and does nothing, the hands on the “Doomsday Clock” for Israel moves forward.

Also Posting: The Bosun Locker

Technorati Tags: HizbollahMiddle EastTerrorismAhmadinejadIranState Sponsored TerrorismIslamIsraelMartyrdom fightersFighters of MuhammadFreedomPoliticsMultilateral EngagementDétenteContainmentUNappeasersTerrorTerrorismTerroristWar on TerrorIslamic ExtremistsJihadHoly WarMuslimsRadical IslamIslamistsFundamentalist MilitantsIslamic WorldKafir

Post to Twitter Post to Plurk Post to Yahoo Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to MySpace Post to Ping.fm Post to Reddit Post to StumbleUpon

Email This Email This

Posted by Stop The ACLU Special Contributor on August 26, 2006 12:18 pm

» Filed Under History, News, War On Terror

Trackback URL:

Links

Comments

8 Responses to “UN backs away from disarming Hezbollah”

  1. Draven32 on August 26th, 2006 4:18 pm

    The disarmament of Hezb’allah cannot be done by force? Who does he think he is kidding on this one?

    I guess the roughly thirty years of negotiation has done a better job of disarming them.

  2. Bosun on August 27th, 2006 2:27 am

    Thank you for your comment, Draven32.

    Respectfully,
    Bosun

  3. Draven32 on August 27th, 2006 2:36 am

    I still need to figure out trackbacks…

  4. badbeans on August 27th, 2006 11:52 am

    What a surprise. Not.

    The U.N. is basically ensuing with their mission to see to the annihilation of Israel by

    a) stopping Israel, who is civil enough to respect agreements
    b) not stopping Israel’s enemies, whose modus operandi is to lie if necessary to meet their ends.

    The only real solution is for Israel to make a sand mote around their country. Her enemies will not stop until she is wiped from the face of the earth.

  5. kerwin_brown on August 27th, 2006 1:22 pm

    Diplomacy generally includes compromises. Hezbollah keeps their weapons but allows a buffer force of U.N. and Lebanon government forces occupy the area. The question is if Hezbollah will start attacking the “Peacekeepers” or if they will ignore them and attack Israel anyways. The hope is that Hezbollah will be pacified and do neither.

    The increased power of the world government concerns me more than the actions of Hezbollah as I am confident Israel can handle them. That is if Israel stops giving into the world government.

  6. Sailnsouth on August 28th, 2006 1:14 pm

    This latest war by the Israelis will only galvanize the sentiments of the Lebanese and the Muslim world against us.

    Almost immediately after the two Israeli soldiers were taken, the Hezbollah oferred to return them to Israel in a prisoner exchange. Although no one should condone that type action it is something that Israel does routinely in Gaza and and the West Bank. It was therefore as much of an issue of tit-for-tat and could have been handled with a much more proportional response from Israel. Instead Israel killed over a thousand inocent Lebanese civilians and destroyed much of the infrastructure in southern Lebanon. They even used cluster bombs which are now being accidently picked up by Lebanese children causing even more injury and death.

    No matter how your leanings are in this area Hezbollah will only be made stronger and we will be identified more closely with Israel. In fact the United States is virtually the only ally Israel has left.

    One of the commonest news bites of the war was a reporter standing in front of Israeli mortar positions firing off unguided mortars into Lebanese towns and then ironically condeming the Hezbollah for sending unguided missiles into Israel. An innocent person killed is just as innocent in Lebanon as it is in Israel. When Israel destroyed a ten story apartment building they killed scores of people because they suspected one apartment might have contained Hezbollah. It is this type of action by the Israelis that is rightfully viewed by the majority of the world as acts of terrorism.

    Remember Israel was formed by the United Nations by taking away lands from the Palestinians who have lived there for a thousand years. In their view they are only trying to get their lands back

    Whether we as Americans like it or not when the Lebanese look out at the destruction of their country they will say the Israelis and Americans did this not Hezbollah. We are alienating over a billion of the worlds people (the Muslims) and I fear we will pay dearly for this in future 9/11 style attacks

  7. Draven32 on August 28th, 2006 2:29 pm

    Hezb’allah wanted to trade an Israeli soldier for hundreds of their terrorist associates. (Hezb’allah had one soldier, Hamas had two)

    Israeli mortars have a precision sighting system and weren’t being targeted at cities forty miles away. Apparently, you have little understanding of the difference between a mortar and a 300 pound unguided rocket. The range on a 81mm mortar is 5700 meters (about 3.6 miles) while the range on the Katyusha rockets Hezb’allah was firing is 45 km. Mortars can be targeted with relative precision at targets within their range, (and some are laser-guided in their terminal flight phase) unlike the Katyusha rockets that Hezb’allah is using, which are basically setting elevation and windage for a target forty kilometers away and firing. A completely different league of weapon.

    The death toll from the apartment building that ’scores’ of people were killed in was 28, then it was 16, then it was 11. A ’score’ is twenty. I guess you haven’t been paying attention to the questionability of a certain ‘rescue worker’ showing off ‘children killed in the attack’ either.

    The ‘Palestinians’ had not been living on that land for ‘a thousand years’. Most of them were refugees from neighboring countries that feld there after the British established Palestine. The ‘country’ of Palestine was an artifical construct made by the British government in 1920. Previous incarnations had been various kingdoms assigned by whomever was ruling the area- the Ottomans, the Romans, etc. During the Ottoman period, there was a series of mass migrations to ‘Palestine’. Those people are the ‘Palestinians’. Those ‘Palestinians’ and their Ottoman and Persian and Roman predecessors took that land from the Jews in the first place.

    Sitting around and negotiating served us really well, hasn’t it? I mean, we pulled out of Lebanon, then got Israel to pull out, and still the attacks continue.

  8. loboinok on August 28th, 2006 5:42 pm

    “Remember Israel was formed by the United Nations by taking away lands from the Palestinians who have lived there for a thousand years. In their view they are only trying to get their lands back”
    http://noiri.blogspot.com/2006/08/u-p-d-t-e-d-palestinians-pure.html#links

  • Advertise

  • Donate

  • Our Store

    • ACLU Bulldozer
    • Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
  • Syndicate Me