Comments on: Is Broadcasting Terrorist Propaganda Protected Free Speech? http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:29:39 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: Political Satire Fake News - The Nose On Your Face http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-54788 Political Satire Fake News - The Nose On Your Face Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:35:37 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/#comment-54788 <strong>Terror TV Programming Uncovered</strong> Israel National News (INN) is reporting today that the terrorist group Hezbollah spends between $15-20 million a year on it's propaganda filled television station, Al Manar. INN maintains that the station's programming casts the Israeli people in a v... Terror TV Programming Uncovered
Israel National News (INN) is reporting today that the terrorist group Hezbollah spends between $15-20 million a year on it’s propaganda filled television station, Al Manar. INN maintains that the station’s programming casts the Israeli people in a v…

]]> By: Old War Dogs http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-54789 Old War Dogs Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:17:05 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/#comment-54789 <strong>Shutting down Terror TV</strong> If you're the one Old War Dogs regular who still doesn't follow Michelle Malkin and Hot Air on a regular basis, I can't let you miss today's Vent on terror TV or Michelle's companion post here. Also, don't miss the excellent related posts at Stop... Shutting down Terror TV
If you’re the one Old War Dogs regular who still doesn’t follow Michelle Malkin and Hot Air on a regular basis, I can’t let you miss today’s Vent on terror TV or Michelle’s companion post here. Also, don’t miss the excellent related posts at Stop…

]]> By: DeMediacratic Nation http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-54791 DeMediacratic Nation Mon, 28 Aug 2006 16:46:33 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/#comment-54791 <strong>Is Broadcasting Terrorist Propaganda Protected Fr</strong> Donna Lieberman of the American Civil Liberties Union said she is ?deeply troubled? that a television distributor is being prosecuted for the content of a broadcaster..... Is Broadcasting Terrorist Propaganda Protected Fr
Donna Lieberman of the American Civil Liberties Union said she is ?deeply troubled? that a television distributor is being prosecuted for the content of a broadcaster…..

]]> By: Glib Fortuna http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-54804 Glib Fortuna Sun, 27 Aug 2006 19:08:07 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/#comment-54804 "How do you know what the purpose of the broadcaster was? You’re only assuming he was trying to “incite illegal behavior” because he’s a brown person." Hmmmmmmm...you imply that there is no way anyone could guess the intentions of this terror propaganda dealer despite a fair amount of evidence that what this guy did is a crime, yet you have no problem assigning motives to others based on NOTHING but a lunatic Leftist reflex. How do you reconcile this hypocrisy? “How do you know what the purpose of the broadcaster was? You’re only assuming he was trying to “incite illegal behavior” because he’s a brown person.”

Hmmmmmmm…you imply that there is no way anyone could guess the intentions of this terror propaganda dealer despite a fair amount of evidence that what this guy did is a crime, yet you have no problem assigning motives to others based on NOTHING but a lunatic Leftist reflex. How do you reconcile this hypocrisy?

]]> By: kerwin_brown http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-54803 kerwin_brown Sun, 27 Aug 2006 18:44:28 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/#comment-54803 Thank you for the ad hominem you launched at me. The point I have so far made on this topic is an apology in comment I made earlier that the ACLU would not touch this case. You of course have presented little evidence or no evidence to back up the accusations you made. The one statement that may be construed as evidence is at best a spurious opinion. How do you know if the accused individual is “brown“? My guess is he is a Caucasian from the Middle East. Caucasians are usually referred to as Whites or are we redefining that term now. I believe Hezbollah TV is the tip off that it is terrorist propaganda. I lay you odds that it is highly Anti Semantic at the very least. I suppose you support racial hatred and believe that the KKK and the Black Panthers should have their own TV where they can stir up Blacks and Whites against each other. That would make Middle East Caucasians and European Caucasian allies against African and Australian Blacks. If you think I am making fun of you then you are correct. If you want to be taken seriously then post a valid argument. If you wish to be ridiculed for being ludicrous then keep posting ad hominem attacks. Thank you for the ad hominem you launched at me. The point I have so far made on this topic is an apology in comment I made earlier that the ACLU would not touch this case.

You of course have presented little evidence or no evidence to back up the accusations you made. The one statement that may be construed as evidence is at best a spurious opinion.

How do you know if the accused individual is “brown“? My guess is he is a Caucasian from the Middle East. Caucasians are usually referred to as Whites or are we redefining that term now.

I believe Hezbollah TV is the tip off that it is terrorist propaganda. I lay you odds that it is highly Anti Semantic at the very least. I suppose you support racial hatred and believe that the KKK and the Black Panthers should have their own TV where they can stir up Blacks and Whites against each other. That would make Middle East Caucasians and European Caucasian allies against African and Australian Blacks.

If you think I am making fun of you then you are correct. If you want to be taken seriously then post a valid argument. If you wish to be ridiculed for being ludicrous then keep posting ad hominem attacks.

]]> By: gfactor http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-54802 gfactor Sun, 27 Aug 2006 16:25:56 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/#comment-54802 "Whatcha say we broadcast some child rapes, snuff films, and some good old fashioned race motivated beatings of some innocent black folk." I don't think child rapes are protected, snuff films --- you can find internet videos of insurgents being killed, or doing killing. Violence? That you can get on most cable stations. “Whatcha say we broadcast some child rapes, snuff films, and some good old fashioned race motivated beatings of some innocent black folk.”

I don’t think child rapes are protected, snuff films — you can find internet videos of insurgents being killed, or doing killing. Violence? That you can get on most cable stations.

]]> By: Joker http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-54801 Joker Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:16:21 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/#comment-54801 I don’t have much to say about the ACLU, but I certainly agree that it should not be deemed protected speech when the intent of the broadcast, replayed or original, is to incite illegal behavior. We are a people who banned Joe the Camel because of the message it was thought to send. In your mind you must decide if a choice is legally wrong or morally wrong. Morals differ, laws are the same for everyone. You can be arrested for inciting riots without braking any other law. So it should be with the broadcast of such materials. Be they religious, racial, or sexual in content. I don’t have much to say about the ACLU, but I certainly agree that it should not be deemed protected speech when the intent of the broadcast, replayed or original, is to incite illegal behavior. We are a people who banned Joe the Camel because of the message it was thought to send. In your mind you must decide if a choice is legally wrong or morally wrong. Morals differ, laws are the same for everyone. You can be arrested for inciting riots without braking any other law. So it should be with the broadcast of such materials. Be they religious, racial, or sexual in content.

]]> By: kerwin_brown http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-54800 kerwin_brown Sun, 27 Aug 2006 06:48:47 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/#comment-54800 I was wrong. I did not believe the ACLU would touch this. I am either misinterpreting the evidence or there is evidence I do not know. Well I guess I can not be right all the time. I was wrong. I did not believe the ACLU would touch this. I am either misinterpreting the evidence or there is evidence I do not know. Well I guess I can not be right all the time.

]]> By: das heize (info4beer) http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-54799 das heize (info4beer) Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:34:40 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/#comment-54799 gfactor- Whatcha say we broadcast some child rapes, snuff films, and some good old fashioned race motivated beatings of some innocent black folk. Sounds legal...and a plausable re-broadcast; the ACLU will certainly advertise in our re-broadcast to generate some additional "it's ok since its legal" money. You looking for work? Maybe you could be the t.v. station manager and bring your daughter to work so she could be proud of what Daddy does, see what your moral strength, character, and ethics are all about. Thanks for helping us build a great nation. gfactor-
Whatcha say we broadcast some child rapes, snuff films, and some good old fashioned race motivated beatings of some innocent black folk. Sounds legal…and a plausable re-broadcast; the ACLU will certainly advertise in our re-broadcast to generate some additional “it’s ok since its legal” money.

You looking for work? Maybe you could be the t.v. station manager and bring your daughter to work so she could be proud of what Daddy does, see what your moral strength, character, and ethics are all about.

Thanks for helping us build a great nation.

]]> By: gfactor http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-54798 gfactor Sat, 26 Aug 2006 15:16:19 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/08/25/is-broadcasting-terrorist-propaganda-protected-free-speech/#comment-54798 The point i'm making is answering the question posed: Is broadcasting hizbollah tv protected speech. The answer I gave is yes. To you this may be academic, but to me its accurate. The point i’m making is answering the question posed: Is broadcasting hizbollah tv protected speech. The answer I gave is yes. To you this may be academic, but to me its accurate.

]]>