Comments on: More on Diggs-Taylor — no stranger to ethical violations http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/22/more-on-diggs-taylor-no-stranger-to-ethical-violations/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:24:34 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: Radaractive http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/22/more-on-diggs-taylor-no-stranger-to-ethical-violations/comment-page-1/#comment-54715 Radaractive Wed, 23 Aug 2006 18:12:22 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/08/22/more-on-diggs-taylor-no-stranger-to-ethical-violations/#comment-54715 <strong>The ACLU &#38; ethically challenged judge = danger to</strong> Judge shopping? I heard on the radio that the ACLU considered nine different venues for their filing. But here is something: The ACLU &#38;#38; ethically challenged judge = danger to
Judge shopping? I heard on the radio that the ACLU considered nine different venues for their filing. But here is something:

]]> By: gabrielsutherland http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/22/more-on-diggs-taylor-no-stranger-to-ethical-violations/comment-page-1/#comment-54714 gabrielsutherland Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:03:48 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/08/22/more-on-diggs-taylor-no-stranger-to-ethical-violations/#comment-54714 The ACLU isn't stupid. Alan Sears and Craig Murray document the public statements made by the architects of the ACLU to bring their cases before judges with a favorable view towards their complaint in "The ACLU vs America". It is also why the judiciary is segmented the way it is so that a plaintiff must repeatedly defend their complaint in a randomly assigned fashion. I'd like to learn how Judge Taylor was assigned to this case. I'd also like to examine these things prior to oral arguments. The ACLU isn’t stupid. Alan Sears and Craig Murray document the public statements made by the architects of the ACLU to bring their cases before judges with a favorable view towards their complaint in “The ACLU vs America”.

It is also why the judiciary is segmented the way it is so that a plaintiff must repeatedly defend their complaint in a randomly assigned fashion.

I’d like to learn how Judge Taylor was assigned to this case. I’d also like to examine these things prior to oral arguments.

]]> By: LC Scott http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/22/more-on-diggs-taylor-no-stranger-to-ethical-violations/comment-page-1/#comment-54713 LC Scott Wed, 23 Aug 2006 05:06:01 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/08/22/more-on-diggs-taylor-no-stranger-to-ethical-violations/#comment-54713 Don't forget this one . "in 1984, Taylor banned nativity scenes on municipal property in Birmingham and Dearborn in ACLU lawsuits." from http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2006608070381 Don’t forget this one . “in 1984, Taylor banned nativity scenes on municipal property in Birmingham and Dearborn in ACLU lawsuits.”

from http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2006608070381

]]> By: Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; We&#38;#8217;re Shocked, SHOCKED, We Tell You! (UPDATED) http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/08/22/more-on-diggs-taylor-no-stranger-to-ethical-violations/comment-page-1/#comment-54712 Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; We&#38;#8217;re Shocked, SHOCKED, We Tell You! (UPDATED) Wed, 23 Aug 2006 04:34:32 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/08/22/more-on-diggs-taylor-no-stranger-to-ethical-violations/#comment-54712 [...] UPDATE: And he has even more, this time about how &#8220;justice&#8221; Taylor, in a case where she uncharacteristically DID choose to recuse herself, went against procedure in order to try to get a judge that she liked to replace her. Did we mention that she is a Carter appointee? No, we didn&#8217;t. We shouldn&#8217;t have to. Posted by Emperor Darth Misha I @ 8:59 pm | [...] [...] UPDATE: And he has even more, this time about how &#38;#8220;justice&#38;#8221; Taylor, in a case where she uncharacteristically DID choose to recuse herself, went against procedure in order to try to get a judge that she liked to replace her. Did we mention that she is a Carter appointee? No, we didn&#38;#8217;t. We shouldn&#38;#8217;t have to. Posted by Emperor Darth Misha I @ 8:59 pm | [...]

]]>