ACLU Loses: NYC subway searches OK
Posted on August 11, 2006
Appeals court upholds random NYC subway searches
NEW YORK (AP) — A federal appeals court has upheld the constitutionality of random bag searches by police in America’s busiest subway system to prevent terrorism.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Friday rejected a challenge to the searches by the New York Civil Liberties Union, saying that a lower court judge properly concluded that the program put in place in July 2005 was “reasonably effective.”The searches began after deadly terrorist bombings in London’s subway system. The NYCLU filed a lawsuit to stop them, saying they were an unprecedented intrusion on privacy and ineffective because they can be easily evaded.
The appeals court said it was proper for Judge Richard M. Berman to conclude that preventing a terrorist attack on the subway was important enough to subject subway riders to random searches.
Berman had concluded that the searches were a reasonably effective deterrent and that the intrusion on the privacy rights of riders was minimal.
In its written ruling, the appeals court noted that New York’s subway system is an “icon of the city’s culture and history, an engine of its colossal economy, a subterranean repository of its art and music, and, most often, the place where millions of diverse New Yorkers and visitors stand elbow to elbow as they traverse the metropolis.”
The court noted that New York’s subway system, the nation’s largest, includes 26 interconnected train lines and 468 far-flung passenger stations, carrying 4.7 million passengers on an average weekday and 1.4 billion riders a year.
The opinion said it was “unsurprising and undisputed that terrorists view it as a prime target.”
The appeals court also noted that the subway system was targeted for attack at least twice in the last nine years. Those attacks, thwarted by police, including a bomb plot in 1997 in Brooklyn and a 2004 plot to bomb the Herald Square subway station.
New York Civil Liberties Union attorneys were reading the decision Friday and had no immediate comment.
Each ACLU loss in cases like these saves lives.
» Filed Under ACLU, Border Control/Homeland Security, War On Terror
Trackback URL
Comments
6 Responses to “ACLU Loses: NYC subway searches OK”
-
Affiliations
The Giants
-
Advertise
Donate
Our Store
Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
Stop the ACLU blogburst
-
More blogs about the ACLU
Syndicate Me
I will not be surprised if they appeal it, even with the recent terror plot from the UK. If it’s good for “middle America” it’s bad for the ACLU.
This is a no brainer since they have a stricter search at the airports. If the ACLU were to win then they would most likely target the Airports next.
“This is a no brainer since they have a stricter search at the airports. ”
Part of the brain says that airplanes are different than subways, so it certainly is a no-brainer to say that.
Gfactor,
I suppose you mean trains can not be used to ram buildings. That hardly seem relevant when you can commit mass murder by blowing one up as was done in London and Spain. I believe Saran Gas was used in Japan. I forgot India and did not know about the one in Russia that killed 46 people. I am sure if I kept looking I could find more.
“I suppose you mean trains can not be used to ram buildings.”
Thats part of the way they’re different, yes.
“That hardly seem relevant when you can commit mass murder by blowing one up as was done in London and Spain.”
You can commit mass murder by blowing up buildings too. So planes are like trains are like buildings, it seems.
I was checked going into the library. They do a more efficient job if I enter a courthouse. Planned Parenthood checks people entering their abortion clinics. The higher the risk factor the more they check.