ACLU Encouraged by U.N. Questioning of U.S. Government
Posted on July 19, 2006
GENEVA, SWITZERLAND — A United Nations human rights body expressed grave concerns today about the record of human rights in the United States. The American Civil Liberties Union with a delegation of 10 and working with a broad coalition of other groups is in Geneva to monitor the examination of the United States the U.N. Human Rights Committee (HRC).
In a two-day session that concluded today, the committee members pressured the United States for answers on the following issues:
The sentencing of children to life without parole and the disproportionate incarceration of minorities;
The militarization of the border;
The failure to prevent human rights violations and respond in a non discriminatory manner to Hurricane Katrina;
The failure to end racial profiling practices, specifically the profiling of South Asian convenience store employees in Georgia;
Warrantless spying on ordinary Americans;
The abuse of women in prison; and
The indefinite detention, rendition and torture of non-citizens.“The U.S. should be ashamed of itself,” said Ann Beeson, Director of the ACLU’s Human Rights Program. “The review by the Human Rights Committee was a stark and all too accurate condemnation of the state of rights in America.”
No, the ACLU should be ashamed of itself. The review by the Human Rights Committee which includes member states Cuba, Saudi Arabia and China ,and ensures that violaters are included, is a joke and nowhere near accurate.
Religious persecutors, Womens Rights violators, Communist Regimes, and illegal organ harvesters will make up the new UN Human Rights Council.
And this is the organization that the ACLU want to hold the U.S. accountable to? The ACLU, and the U.N. are the two most dangerous organizations in the world. They are both seeking to destroy America’s credibility and soverignty. The U.N. are a corrupt joke when it comes to human rights, and they have absolutely zero credibility to make any judgement on America in that area.
The ACLU, who provided the list called “Dimming the Beacon of Freedom”, to this corrupt organization that can’t even clean up its own human rights violations are an embarrassement to this great nation. It is shameful that their list included our efforts to spy on the enemy, protect our borders, and several other accusations without evidence. I also wonder if their accusation to “abuse” of women in prison would be not providing them with abortions at the expense of taxpayers.
Besides the issues within our own judicial system and its decay, the ACLU is also turning to international sources to undermine our nation’s sovereignty and national security.
For instance, the ACLU filed a formal complaint with the United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention against the United States, stating that the United States violated international law when it detained 765 Arab Americans and Muslims for security reasons after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attack on our nation. Eventually, 478 were deported. ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero said, “With today’s action, we are sending a strong message of solidarity to advocates in other countries who have decried the impact of U.S. policies on the human rights of their citizens. We are filing this complaint before the United Nations to ensure that U.S. policies and practices reflect not just domestic constitutional standards, but accepted international human rights principles regarding liberty and its deprivations.” Source
Romero, of course, makes the United States sound like some rogue nation with no regard for human rights, not the beacon of liberty that so many have come to escaping from tyranny and the bonds of oppression.
All of this should concern you. You may think that it doesn’t directly affect you in your everyday life, but it will eventually. The ACLU’s embrace of international law seeks to hypocritically do the opposite of what the ACLU claim to protect, and the Constitution forbids; prohibit the free exercise of religion.
In spring 2003, a group from the United Nations Human Rights Commission, of which former ACLU officials Paul Hoffman and John Shattuck are a part, met and discussed a resolution to add “sexual orientation” to the UNHRC’s discrimination list. Homosexual activists at the meeting called for a “showdown with religion,” clearly intending to use international law to silence religious speech that does not affirm homosexual behavior. Source
The ACLU’s actions are a direct threat to our very freedom of speech, religious exercise, security, and soverignity. In some countries, laws are being pushed, and in some cases, enacted that essentially criminalize forms of religious speech and activity that does not affirm homosexual behavior.
If we are going to turn the interpretation of our laws to international jurisprudence, and decisions of foreign courts, judges, and legislatures, the question begs…why did we fight a war of independence? If the ACLU are successful in their agenda for international law, the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution will eventually become irrelevant documents. More and more of America’s freedoms, and our very soverignty will be sacrificed for international law. Our freedoms will vanish. The ACLU’s vision of freedom that includes the public sale of child pornography, the silencing of churchs and ministries, and unlimited abortion and euthanasia will replace them. To many Americans, these sound more like human rights violations than anything on the ACLU’s list.
On October 27, 1787, Alexander Hamilton predicted that a “dangerous ambition” would one day tyrannize the gangling young American Republic, all the while lurking “behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people.” It could almost be said that Hamilton had a prophecy of the ACLU.
This was a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please email Jay or Gribbit. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 200 blogs already on-board.
» Filed Under ACLU, News, War On Terror
Trackback URL
Comments
5 Responses to “ACLU Encouraged by U.N. Questioning of U.S. Government”




























This “universal human rights” crap is laughable. More on that
The ACLU should be ashamed of itself for implying that we need to be accountable to the U.N. for anything. This organization, with a track record of gang rape in third world countries, and oil for food scandals, has no place dictating anything to anyone.
I didn’t mean for that whole last post to be a link, but okay.
I can understand your dismay, but you’re forgetting. Bush has only been in power for 6 years. Saudi Arabia, China, and Cuba have such a leg up on being truly great human rights abusers. I think Bush’s family’s close relationship with Saudi Royalty has helped him get a leg up on human right’s abuses, but it’s a long process to convert a democracy into an abusive totalitarian state. There’s been some great work going before him. And my home state Texas has continued to do some great work (Rick Perry the retard killer – I’m lookin’ at you). I’m sure that we’ll get there eventually. We find it harder and harder to live with each other every day.
I got the following reply when I crossposted this post at Gather.com:
You very much mis-state the ACLU’s vision of freedom.
The ACLU does not favor the public sale of child pornogrpahy. However it does maintain that everyone accused of violating laws gets fair representation and full rights under the law.
The other charges in you litany are incorrect. I hope you’re simply mistaken and not being deliberately dishonest. You’re creating a straw man and then tearing it down. It’s sad to see some on the right lie about those with whom they disagree.
I’m a member of the ACLU. I and we don’t believe any of those things you listed in your article.
I’m going to wait until I get home from work to respond to him. In the meantime, if someone could email me a source for their stance on kiddie porn, it would save me from looking up later. Either way, I’m hoping to turn this guy off of the ACLU, because I suspect that he has no clue about what it really stands for.
What about the United Nations violations of human rights. Their unofficial support of legalized abortion through their NGO’s, such as the ACLU, clearly violate their own charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Article 25 (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.
Then we could talk about how legalized abortion violates the UN’s own definition of genicide.