Tony Snow Thanks Helen Thomas For “Hezbollah View”
Check out the video at Outside The Beltway! Absolutely hillarious! How this loony woman is still allowed to keep a job as a legitimate journalist is beyond me! Maybe its because she is truly reflecting the majority of the left’s real thoughts. She is entirely stupid and thinks we somehow vetoed a cease fire at the U.N. I’m rolling in the floor laughing on this one.
Hat tip: Hot Air
Email This
Posted by Jay on July 18, 2006 3:14 pm
» Filed Under News, War On Terror
Trackback URL:
Links
- Shining City Atop a Hill: Thank You For Leaving, Ms. Thomas
- Thespis Journal: The Great One: Tony Snow
- Tony Snow vs. Helen Thomas at 4thelittleguy.com pinged this post.
- NoisyRoom.net » Blog Archive » Tony Snow vs. Helen Thomas pinged this post.
Comments
13 Responses to “Tony Snow Thanks Helen Thomas For “Hezbollah View””
-
-
-
Affiliations
The Giants
Advertise
-
-
Our Store
- Click the design to visit our store and help Stop the ACLU!
-
- More blogs about the ACLU
Syndicate Me
I agree with you Jay… I have no idea why we still have this woman reporting at the White House.
I imagine it is tradition.
But I have read one of her books titled “Thanks For The Memories Mr. President” and was blown away.
You couldn’t find a more egotistical woman in the world. She thought her questions were just so damn witty.
You obviously haven’t watched much Fox News. Apparently being an ignorant loon is what is required of journalists these days.
I think “loony” is a lot closer than “stupid,” though it’s possible that she’s both.
This is the sort of behavior one expects from a spoiled child. Thomas is stamping her feet and screeching because she’s not getting the sort of deferential response she wants. With luck, Snow’s excellent conduct in his new responsibilities will eventually convey to the entire press corps that the days of White House cringing before the Fourth Estate are over. Until another Democrat is elected president, of course.
Man why don’t you guys move to North Korea or Cuba? Sounds like you’d welcome a dictator who was never questioned. You wouldn’t have to worry about your precious president being questioned by the Fourth Estate ever again.
We’d just appreciate some unbiased reporting. You want to report from the white House? Just report. Don’t editorialize.
Maybe you should check out what she was actually talking about before ripping her. She was talking about this US veto of a UN resolution that would have condemned Israel
Is that what she was talking about? She sure did sound confusing to me. Anyway, it was still fun to watch her get smacked down for her sympathy with the enemy.
I don’t think it was confusing at all. It was quite obvious she was talking about the U.N. resolution, and Tony Snow was either extremely ignorant or he was lying outright. I’d guess the latter, considering it’s his job to know what the administration is up to.
I don’t think he lied. I think he answered her question. She said there was a cease fire we vetoed. That isn’t true. I think she was confused and perhaps confused everyone there. We vetoed a condemnation. I’m sure that is what she was referring to, but had her facts mixed up.
Jesus why did this thread bring out the Liberal idiots like meatless and tThomas? Because one of their beloved ICons, Helen Senile Liberal Thomas was being questioned. She should have been exiled a decade ago as a traitor. Live with it. As for the UN resolutions, for once, for frigging ONCE, it would be nice for one Liberal big mouth know nothing to actually do some research before they open their big liar mouths towards people telling the truth, and conservatives in general. For your information Mr Idiot aka Meatless, if you did one ounce of GD research, you would know that in FACT there was NO current or recent UN resolutions regarding Israel that were vetoed by the US. If your feeble pea sized brain is not able to comprehend that FACT you can try doing the research yourself. Here is the first US web site for you to browse: http://www.everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=1172768 Once your done there, you can take your liberal pea brain over here and look down the list: http://www.un.org/Docs/sc/unsc_resolutions06.htm What you will need to do is remove your finger from your nose and place it on the mouse. Move your arm so that it moves the mouse and the arrow thingy is over any one of the 2006 UN resolutions listed. Hint: Look for the ones that say “The situation in the Middle East”. Once you find them, press the left mouse button. The document will then open and you do what we conservatives call Reading. As you will discover much to your chgrin I am sure is that none of the resolutions there have ANYTHING to do with a ceasefire, and NONE were vetoed by the US. Ilk like you make me sick, and frankly I’m sick and damn tired of you and your ilk destroying this country with your bullcrap. I can hear you now with the old liberal standby comeback “then why don’t you leave, maybe move to Germany or Beruit”. I got a better idea. Find out where the next bomb will drop over in the Middle East and go stand there. Idiot….
I won’t resort to name calling but I believe you were looking at the pages for resolutions that “pass”.
Here’s a page from the UN on the US vetoing a Security Council resolution:
http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=19195&Cr=middle&Cr1=east
Your everything.com article appears to have been last updated in 2001 if I’m reading the page correctly.
Here’s the coverage in two MSM sources:
http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/07/13/mideast.response/index.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,203307,00.html
Is this possibly what Helen was talking about? Are perhaps the liberals posting on this thread not idiots? Can some liberals in fact do research?
You are correct that the resolution had nothing to do with a ceasefire. And Helen’s questions may have been phrased poorly. But you can hardly claim that she is being a bad journalist by asking questions. Plus, she’s placed there by Hearst media. Hardly a liberal political mouthpeace. Perhaps they want her in there asking hard questions of Tony Snow, because they want their newspapers to be able to report actual facts. Perhaps, they feel she’s doing a good job getting them the information they need, regardless of whether the left or the right approve.
NoLibs, I appreciate what you were trying to do but in the future please drop the name calling.
I also dislike Helen Thomas but that is no way to handle the situation.
(I have also learned that if we are polite then we don’t look look as foolish when we make a mistake.)
Rational and Polite Debate Please!
NoLibs wrote:
“For your information Mr Idiot aka Meatless, if you did one ounce of GD research, you would know that in FACT there was NO current or recent UN resolutions regarding Israel that were vetoed by the US.”
False:
Looking at a list of approved resolutions won’t tell you which ones were vetoed. NoLibs would be well advised to do one ounce of research — or perhaps two — before he next undertakes to comment. Doing his research will reduce the chances that he will look foolish the next time.