<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supreme Court Says Guantánamo Bay Military Commissions Are Unconstitutional; ACLU Calls Decision a Victory for the “Rule of Law”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kerwin_brown</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-52758</link>
		<dc:creator>kerwin_brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 05:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-52758</guid>
		<description>That is war crimes trials.  I am not sure if the government wants to do that with the prisoners in Gitmo.  From their action so fait it apears more like they are trying to debrief them and then give them back to their home countries when they have gotten what they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is war crimes trials.  I am not sure if the government wants to do that with the prisoners in Gitmo.  From their action so fait it apears more like they are trying to debrief them and then give them back to their home countries when they have gotten what they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gfactor</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-52757</link>
		<dc:creator>gfactor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 23:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-52757</guid>
		<description>&quot;We have never tried prisoners of war before. &quot;

	Uh, aren&#039;t there precedents for trying people in violation of the laws of war?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We have never tried prisoners of war before. &#8221;</p>
<p>	Uh, aren&#8217;t there precedents for trying people in violation of the laws of war?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Citizen Journal</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-52760</link>
		<dc:creator>Citizen Journal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-52760</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Digesting Hamdan&lt;/strong&gt;
	There&#039;s nothing quite like a 185-page US Supreme Court decision, comprised of Parts I through &quot;VI-D-iv,&quot; to shut me up. Short of a double-shot of Ritalin, my eyes would be bleeding and/or have popped clear out of my head had...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Digesting Hamdan</strong><br />
	There&#8217;s nothing quite like a 185-page US Supreme Court decision, comprised of Parts I through &#8220;VI-D-iv,&#8221; to shut me up. Short of a double-shot of Ritalin, my eyes would be bleeding and/or have popped clear out of my head had&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kerwin_brown</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-52761</link>
		<dc:creator>kerwin_brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-52761</guid>
		<description>Constantine,

	We have never tried prisoners of war before.  You negotiate with their country of origin for their release. If you had been paying attention you would know that is done. Wake up you are falling for propaganda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Constantine,</p>
<p>	We have never tried prisoners of war before.  You negotiate with their country of origin for their release. If you had been paying attention you would know that is done. Wake up you are falling for propaganda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantine</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-52762</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 03:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-52762</guid>
		<description>If the Bushites are so bloody convinced that everybody at Gitmo is a dangerous terrorist, if they have such solid evidence, why are they afraid to give them a fair trial? If convicted, they could keep them imprisoned as long as they wanted or execute them, right? Rather, they know that in their paranoia to round up everybody who was accused of terrorism, they imprisoned quite a few innocents. With the world&#039;s eyes on Gitmo, Bush would rather keep people locked up indefinitely than admit his administration screwed the pooch (again).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Bushites are so bloody convinced that everybody at Gitmo is a dangerous terrorist, if they have such solid evidence, why are they afraid to give them a fair trial? If convicted, they could keep them imprisoned as long as they wanted or execute them, right? Rather, they know that in their paranoia to round up everybody who was accused of terrorism, they imprisoned quite a few innocents. With the world&#8217;s eyes on Gitmo, Bush would rather keep people locked up indefinitely than admit his administration screwed the pooch (again).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pirate&#38;#38;#8217;s Cove &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; USSC Grants Terrorists Rights</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-52745</link>
		<dc:creator>Pirate&#38;#38;#8217;s Cove &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; USSC Grants Terrorists Rights</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 22:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-52745</guid>
		<description>[...] Stop The ACLU Maybe they shouldn&#38;rsquo;t be so fast to celebrate. Not being able to detain these guys means that instead of them hiring ACLU lawyers they will probably just be killed on the battlefield. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stop The ACLU Maybe they shouldn&#38;#38;rsquo;t be so fast to celebrate. Not being able to detain these guys means that instead of them hiring ACLU lawyers they will probably just be killed on the battlefield. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Swift</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-52759</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Swift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-52759</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Declare Supreme Court Justices Enemy Combatants &lt;/strong&gt;
	Although I have not actually read the entire Constitution, I believe that in the Article that gives the President the power to designate enemy combatants there is nothing that explicitly protects members of the Supreme Court from being declared enemy c...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Declare Supreme Court Justices Enemy Combatants </strong><br />
	Although I have not actually read the entire Constitution, I believe that in the Article that gives the President the power to designate enemy combatants there is nothing that explicitly protects members of the Supreme Court from being declared enemy c&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alabama Improper</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-52763</link>
		<dc:creator>Alabama Improper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-52763</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Stop The ACLU Blogburst&lt;/strong&gt;
	The website and blog seem to focus more on family oriented issues: teen sex education, religious issues, family matters, and the like. These are more of the topics I like to blog about and the people at Take Issue, Take Charge need to be challenged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Stop The ACLU Blogburst</strong><br />
	The website and blog seem to focus more on family oriented issues: teen sex education, religious issues, family matters, and the like. These are more of the topics I like to blog about and the people at Take Issue, Take Charge need to be challenged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confederate Yankee</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-52764</link>
		<dc:creator>Confederate Yankee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-52764</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bush Loses Hamdan, SCOTUS Loses Its Mind&lt;/strong&gt;
	According to the Associated Press: The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President Bush overstepped his authority in ordering military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees. The ruling, a rebuke to the administration and its aggressive anti-te...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bush Loses Hamdan, SCOTUS Loses Its Mind</strong><br />
	According to the Associated Press: The Supreme Court ruled Thursday that President Bush overstepped his authority in ordering military war crimes trials for Guantanamo Bay detainees. The ruling, a rebuke to the administration and its aggressive anti-te&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right on the Right &#38;#38;#187; A Ruling That Cannot Stand</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/comment-page-1/#comment-52765</link>
		<dc:creator>Right on the Right &#38;#38;#187; A Ruling That Cannot Stand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 20:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/29/supreme-court-says-guantanamo-bay-military-commissions-are-unconstitutional-aclu-calls-decision-a-victory-for-the-rule-of-law/#comment-52765</guid>
		<description>[...] The Supreme Court has ruled 5-3 that our current system of military tribunals and regulations, which is allowing us to hold hundreds upon hundreds of dangerous terrorists at Gitmo, is unConstitutional. The question is, what do we do now? Do we release dangerous terrorists back into the world, or do we spend years upon years trying every single one of them in a civilian court. Do we waste countless millions of dollars providing each of them a legal defense and trying them? Providing defense shouldn&#38;#8217;t be a problem, as the ACLU seems more than willing to do so. Stop the ACLU brings us the best coverage: In a sharp rebuke to the Bush administration, the United States Supreme Court today ruled 5-3 that the military commissions system established by President Bush to try detainees at Guantánamo Bay is unfair and illegal. The American Civil Liberties Union, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, applauded the decision. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Supreme Court has ruled 5-3 that our current system of military tribunals and regulations, which is allowing us to hold hundreds upon hundreds of dangerous terrorists at Gitmo, is unConstitutional. The question is, what do we do now? Do we release dangerous terrorists back into the world, or do we spend years upon years trying every single one of them in a civilian court. Do we waste countless millions of dollars providing each of them a legal defense and trying them? Providing defense shouldn&#38;#38;#8217;t be a problem, as the ACLU seems more than willing to do so. Stop the ACLU brings us the best coverage: In a sharp rebuke to the Bush administration, the United States Supreme Court today ruled 5-3 that the military commissions system established by President Bush to try detainees at Guantánamo Bay is unfair and illegal. The American Civil Liberties Union, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, applauded the decision. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

