Comments on: The NY Times Responds http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:21:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Planck's Constant http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-52623 Planck's Constant Sun, 02 Jul 2006 03:16:44 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/#comment-52623 <strong>The Woman behind New York Times SWIFT Leak</strong> Back in March of this year, Lotta Twotta applied for a job at the New York Times for the position of News Editor. She was promptly hired because of her huge IQ and her ability to keep abreast of items of important public interest. The Woman behind New York Times SWIFT Leak
Back in March of this year, Lotta Twotta applied for a job at the New York Times for the position of News Editor. She was promptly hired because of her huge IQ and her ability to keep abreast of items of important public interest.

]]> By: mooiss http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-52625 mooiss Thu, 29 Jun 2006 04:07:03 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/#comment-52625 Reply to #24: I'll take a crack at this: Like the broadcaster announcing his team's game, we want our media to share our perspective, and report accordingly--not aid the enemy. If there's a single would-be terrorist who will be able to evade detection, transfer money, improve on his recruitment quota of homicide bombers, and plan more effective tactics--including more-potent IEDs--as a consequence of the frequently-despicable reporting by our media of the IW...well, there's your answer. Yes, our media should be <i>supporting</i> our war effort--not undermining it. And they certainly should not serve as mouthpieces for Quislings lurking within our government. Reply to #24:

I’ll take a crack at this: Like the broadcaster announcing his team’s game, we want our media to share our perspective, and report accordingly–not aid the enemy. If there’s a single would-be terrorist who will be able to evade detection, transfer money, improve on his recruitment quota of homicide bombers, and plan more effective tactics–including more-potent IEDs–as a consequence of the frequently-despicable reporting by our media of the IW…well, there’s your answer. Yes, our media should be supporting our war effort–not undermining it. And they certainly should not serve as mouthpieces for Quislings lurking within our government.

]]> By: meatbrain http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-52620 meatbrain Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:03:35 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/#comment-52620 Answer a simple question: What, exactly, was the top secret program that the New York Times allegedly revealed? Answer a simple question:

What, exactly, was the top secret program that the New York Times allegedly revealed?

]]> By: Blue Star Chronicles http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-52630 Blue Star Chronicles Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:55:07 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/#comment-52630 <strong>Some Faces of Liberal Hypocrisy</strong> Villanious Company has one of the best articles I?ve read on Liberal Anti-War Hypocrisy Knows No Bounds. She offers several well-documented examples of selective outrage on the part of the liberal left. There also seems to be selective concern that o... Some Faces of Liberal Hypocrisy
Villanious Company has one of the best articles I?ve read on Liberal Anti-War Hypocrisy Knows No Bounds. She offers several well-documented examples of selective outrage on the part of the liberal left. There also seems to be selective concern that o…

]]> By: AShiningCity http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-52629 AShiningCity Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:45:13 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/#comment-52629 Is the New York Times forgetting something? http://powerlineblog.com/archives/014523.php Is the New York Times forgetting something?

http://powerlineblog.com/archives/014523.php

]]> By: Stop The ACLU http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-52626 Stop The ACLU Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:50:56 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/#comment-52626 <strong>The Pirate Armada Vs. The New York Times</strong> Many of the buccaneers of The Pirate Armada share my outrage ... The Pirate Armada Vs. The New York Times
Many of the buccaneers of The Pirate Armada share my outrage

…

]]> By: The Dread Pundit Bluto http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-52607 The Dread Pundit Bluto Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:45:55 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/#comment-52607 <strong>The Pirate Armada Vs. The New York Times</strong> Many of the buccaneers of The Pirate Armada share my outrage... The Pirate Armada Vs. The New York Times
Many of the buccaneers of The Pirate Armada share my outrage…

]]> By: kerwin_brown http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-52608 kerwin_brown Tue, 27 Jun 2006 02:44:44 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/#comment-52608 The U.S. Constitution Section 3. "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. " The ACLU and the American Bar Association are both guilty of treason since they have agreed to advance the principles of the United Nations over the U.S. Constitution. This is because the constitutional oath declares those who attack the Constitution as enemies of the United States. If the NY Times is knowingly aiding Al Queda then they are guilty of treason. The U.S. Constitution Section 3. “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. ”

The ACLU and the American Bar Association are both guilty of treason since they have agreed to advance the principles of the United Nations over the U.S. Constitution.

This is because the constitutional oath declares those who attack the Constitution as enemies of the United States.

If the NY Times is knowingly aiding Al Queda then they are guilty of treason.

]]> By: mooiss http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-52609 mooiss Tue, 27 Jun 2006 01:21:52 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/#comment-52609 Through the selfish, reckless, arrogant act of publishing our national secrets--without regard for the greater national interest served by <i>not publishing them--the MSM is squandering the fragile consideration offered the fourth estate to protect their sources. This may be damage that can never be repaired, which is something I don't want to see happen. I would include in this litany CBS and the Abu Gharib images [while stubbornly refusing to transmit images of the atrocities perpetrated by the Muslim extremists (including the Berg beheading, the WTC collapse...)], NBC's 7/2004 story on CIA involvement in Iraq's then-pending elections (casting doubt on the validity of those elections), the Washington Post story on Eastern European prison camps, the story on cell phone monitoring, the stories disclosing the enemy's most effective tactics (and our greatest vulnerabilities)...etc. While I don't begrudge the reporters who cover the Iraq War holing-up in the Al Rashad, (instead of moving out among the populace) to make their reports--Iraq is after all a very dangerous place--there is more to the IW than US troop death counts, and video on the (next) "atrocity" committed by US troops. Maybe it would be more accurate for the media to report nothing, than to just bombard us with these canned, one-sided "stories".</i> Through the selfish, reckless, arrogant act of publishing our national secrets–without regard for the greater national interest served by not publishing them–the MSM is squandering the fragile consideration offered the fourth estate to protect their sources. This may be damage that can never be repaired, which is something I don’t want to see happen.

I would include in this litany CBS and the Abu Gharib images [while stubbornly refusing to transmit images of the atrocities perpetrated by the Muslim extremists (including the Berg beheading, the WTC collapse...)], NBC’s 7/2004 story on CIA involvement in Iraq’s then-pending elections (casting doubt on the validity of those elections), the Washington Post story on Eastern European prison camps, the story on cell phone monitoring, the stories disclosing the enemy’s most effective tactics (and our greatest vulnerabilities)…etc.

While I don’t begrudge the reporters who cover the Iraq War holing-up in the Al Rashad, (instead of moving out among the populace) to make their reports–Iraq is after all a very dangerous place–there is more to the IW than US troop death counts, and video on the (next) “atrocity” committed by US troops. Maybe it would be more accurate for the media to report nothing, than to just bombard us with these canned, one-sided “stories”.

]]> By: Prosecuting the NY Times at 4thelittleguy.com http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/comment-page-1/#comment-52618 Prosecuting the NY Times at 4thelittleguy.com Tue, 27 Jun 2006 00:07:04 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/26/the-ny-times-responds/#comment-52618 [...] Sister Toldjah Expose the Left Stop The ACLU Freedom for Some California Conservative [...] [...] Sister Toldjah Expose the Left Stop The ACLU Freedom for Some California Conservative [...]

]]>