<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate Debates Flag Burning Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/senate-debates-flag-burning-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/senate-debates-flag-burning-amendment/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mick O</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/senate-debates-flag-burning-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-52649</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2006 16:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/26/senate-debates-flag-burning-amendment/#comment-52649</guid>
		<description>I am not sure how I feel about this. While I loathe people who disgrace our country by burning its flag in protest, doesn&#039;t the free speech amendment allow for this form of protest? Congress really should be working to pass some more meaningful legislation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure how I feel about this. While I loathe people who disgrace our country by burning its flag in protest, doesn&#8217;t the free speech amendment allow for this form of protest? Congress really should be working to pass some more meaningful legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shining City Atop a Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/senate-debates-flag-burning-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-52647</link>
		<dc:creator>Shining City Atop a Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/26/senate-debates-flag-burning-amendment/#comment-52647</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Republicans and Democrats Agree: The Flag Burning&lt;/strong&gt;
	While it is unusual for me to side with Mr. Dick Durbin he is right on target with this comment:

	&quot;There are scarcely any instances across America where people are burning the flag. And yet, now we want to set aside the important business of the Se...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Republicans and Democrats Agree: The Flag Burning</strong><br />
	While it is unusual for me to side with Mr. Dick Durbin he is right on target with this comment:</p>
<p>	&#8220;There are scarcely any instances across America where people are burning the flag. And yet, now we want to set aside the important business of the Se&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/senate-debates-flag-burning-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-52648</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 21:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/26/senate-debates-flag-burning-amendment/#comment-52648</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Flag amendment faces close Senate vote

	&lt;/strong&gt;
	A constitutional amendment to ban flag desecration faced a close Senate vote Tuesday, with supporter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Flag amendment faces close Senate vote</p>
<p>	</strong><br />
	A constitutional amendment to ban flag desecration faced a close Senate vote Tuesday, with supporter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Outpost</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/senate-debates-flag-burning-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-52646</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Outpost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/26/senate-debates-flag-burning-amendment/#comment-52646</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Daily Summary&lt;/strong&gt;
	NEWS: - Flag Protection Amendment Moves Toward Vote - Justices narrowly uphold Kansas death penalty law - Surveillance Disclosure Denounced - Justices Reject Vermont&#039;s Campaign Finance Law - Massachusetts Clergy Clash Over Homosexual Marriage - McKinn...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Daily Summary</strong><br />
	NEWS: &#8211; Flag Protection Amendment Moves Toward Vote &#8211; Justices narrowly uphold Kansas death penalty law &#8211; Surveillance Disclosure Denounced &#8211; Justices Reject Vermont&#8217;s Campaign Finance Law &#8211; Massachusetts Clergy Clash Over Homosexual Marriage &#8211; McKinn&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pirate&#38;#38;#8217;s Cove &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; NY Times: Let&#38;#38;#8217;s Burn The Flag</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/06/26/senate-debates-flag-burning-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-52645</link>
		<dc:creator>Pirate&#38;#38;#8217;s Cove &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; NY Times: Let&#38;#38;#8217;s Burn The Flag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/06/26/senate-debates-flag-burning-amendment/#comment-52645</guid>
		<description>[...] Stop The ACLU on the Senate debate     &#38;nbsp; [link] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stop The ACLU on the Senate debate     &#38;#38;nbsp; [link] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

