Look at the lefts attempts to kill off the black race by legalizing abortion that kills blacks at three times the rate of whites. When you look at the lefts support of legalized drugs which accounts for a large number of murders and other atrocities among blacks then you begin to wonder what is the difference between the American left and Hitler’s Nazis.

Your moniker is a bad fit. No leap at all. Hitler employed exactly what Darwinian evolution called for, only he thought he would hasten what he saw as inevitable in a Darwinian prism of racial “purity.” Besides, the full title of Darwin’s seminal work (or, as you call it, the Bible you’ve never read) is: “On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.” The implications of such a title and the myths within your Holy Writ would not be lost even your first cousin Bonzo.

The ranks of Darwin’s followers and contemporaries were stocked with eugenists and many a brand of vile racist. Galton, Sanger, Haeckl and many others who formed the worldview foundation of much of today’s Left were vicious and unapologetic partisans to a creed embraced by Nazism. You can’t challenge this, it’s true and well-documented. Suggested reading (if you have the guts):

From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany (Weikart)

Architects of the Culture of Death (De Marco)

Intellectuals (Paul Johnson)

My stand is the ACLU is an anarchistic organization and not that it is a communist organization. The two differ though they are known to be allied in the past. That alliance broke down once the communist came to power. The ACLU ridden themselves of communist could well have been either a vendetta or a political ploy. What is the ACLU’s view of communism today? Are there communist board members today?

Roger Baldwin was a member of the Industrial Workers of the World which was and still is an anarchist union which plots the overthrow of the government of the United States. The ACLU has been a large help to them in accomplishing that goal.

General Douglas MacArthur aided Roger Baldwin in setting up civil liberty unions in many of the conquered countries after World War II.

Roger Baldwin was a member of the Unitarian Universalist church which is now an NGO of the United Nations and appears to be the UN’s blueprint for all associated churches since the Episcopalian Church(USA) which is another NGO is compromising what is written in the bible with what the UU through the UN preaches. Baldwin maintained an office in the secretariat building of the United Nations.

What about the “huge-ass leap” from not being able to explain something, attributing it to NOTHING and forever using that as a given, presupposing a naturalistic explanation for everything despite the fact that most of the time you are required to engage in the most implausible formulaic gymnastics in order for any new findings (especially those in microbiology and lack of vindication in the fossil record — where are all your transitory species???) to fit it into the established position from which the Atheocracy refuses to budge.

“To enter the field of intellectual argument is to accept the risk that we may lose by being proved wring. But accepting the risk of being wrong is the inescapable price for making any meaningful statements about the world.” –PE Johnson

Reflect on the above quote. Enlighten yourself.

Darwinian evolution IS the fanatical faith we are talking about here. Just because others have sewn parts on to the Frankenstein monster that is this basis for eugenics, ethnic cleansing, Nazism, Communism, etc. doesn’t mean that a nobody like you can diminish Darwinism as THE intellectual baseline for “rational” people like you. Dawkins himself said Darwinism made it “possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.” Telling admission that atheists don’t have much else.

I guess you have conceded all points in the original argument. Maybe there is some hope for you!

The real anti-intellectuals are people like you who will fight to the death for people to never be exposed to the TRUTH that Darwiniam evolution/secular creationism is a house built on thin-grain sand. Most of Darwin’s grand predictions and the accompanying hoaxers (Haeckl, Piltdown man, etc.) that attempted to hoodwink a confused populace have failed and failed again. I say, let’s have the debate…only your side is unwilling because you don’t have the guts to defend your weak ideas.

With all the hatred toward college and education that is perpetrated around here, you have the nerve to call me an anti-intellectual? I love science – especially good science – and evolutionary theory is pretty effin’ good science. Compared to ID, the theory of evolution is the Lord’s truth (irony most definitely intended). ID is sham science. What scientific method are you using when you encounter something you can’t explain and make a huge-ass leap in attributing it to some invisible father in the sky? That’s the OPPOSITE of good science. Any scientist who promotes ID has an alterior motive that isn’t too hard to figure out, but thankfully for the right-thinking world such scientists are in the minority.

Another thing you’re misrepresenting about evolutionary theory is that it begins and ends with Darwin. He laid the groundwork, but the theory has been expanded a million times over since then.

To paraphrase the judge from “The Simpsons”: Religion must stay at least 500 feet from science at all times. It’s a funny thing the truth you can find in cartoons sometimes.

I have to ask you one more question, but I’m not asking to be rude. I’m asking so that I might save myself some time in the future: Are you a parody like that Gribbit guy? If you are, major propers.