<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Supreme Court Refuses To Hear Sex Offender Visitation Case, ACLU Disappointed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 07:25:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: technomagi</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/comment-page-1/#comment-51304</link>
		<dc:creator>technomagi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 22:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/#comment-51304</guid>
		<description>I have an idea that I believe could stop the ACLU or at least slow them down. Stop them legally. This is my theory. I believe that anyone who favors as many evil things as this organization is led by people who cannot stand under personal scrutiny. I believe that if professional investigators started digging into the personal lives of the ACLU&#039;s officers, leaders and key members that they would probably find a lot of dirt. The idea is simple. Form an organization dedicated to investigating these individuals and when evidence of criminal activity is discovered turn it over to the proper authorities and of course to the newspapers. If enough of these people get busted for child pornography or whatever their poison is then the whole organization will be discredited and demoralized.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have an idea that I believe could stop the ACLU or at least slow them down. Stop them legally. This is my theory. I believe that anyone who favors as many evil things as this organization is led by people who cannot stand under personal scrutiny. I believe that if professional investigators started digging into the personal lives of the ACLU&#8217;s officers, leaders and key members that they would probably find a lot of dirt. The idea is simple. Form an organization dedicated to investigating these individuals and when evidence of criminal activity is discovered turn it over to the proper authorities and of course to the newspapers. If enough of these people get busted for child pornography or whatever their poison is then the whole organization will be discredited and demoralized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Culture &#38;#38;#187; Pedophile Political Party - Children 12 yrs old invited</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/comment-page-1/#comment-51297</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Culture &#38;#38;#187; Pedophile Political Party - Children 12 yrs old invited</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 15:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/#comment-51297</guid>
		<description>[...] And, surely, inspiring curiousity among children is preferable to buggering them? Surely.  Stop the ACLU: If you are a pedophile, the ACLU is looking out for you. The argument is old hat for the ACLU, who believe not only that pedophiles and sex offenders should have the right to live next to playgrounds and elementary schools, but that they even have the right to instruct their perverted buddies on how to rape little boys. These positions are quite disturbing to most Americans, especially those of us with children. It is even scarier when there are loony judges out there that actually rule in favor of these twisted views. Luckily, the Supreme Court shot the ACLU down this time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And, surely, inspiring curiousity among children is preferable to buggering them? Surely.  Stop the ACLU: If you are a pedophile, the ACLU is looking out for you. The argument is old hat for the ACLU, who believe not only that pedophiles and sex offenders should have the right to live next to playgrounds and elementary schools, but that they even have the right to instruct their perverted buddies on how to rape little boys. These positions are quite disturbing to most Americans, especially those of us with children. It is even scarier when there are loony judges out there that actually rule in favor of these twisted views. Luckily, the Supreme Court shot the ACLU down this time. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Dumb Ox</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/comment-page-1/#comment-51298</link>
		<dc:creator>The Dumb Ox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 13:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/#comment-51298</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Pedophilia, Bestiality, Free Trains!!!  (or, Consequences of Gnosticism, Part I in a series)&lt;/strong&gt;
	So goes the platform of the new Dutch political party, &quot;Charity, Freedom, Diversity&quot;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Pedophilia, Bestiality, Free Trains!!!  (or, Consequences of Gnosticism, Part I in a series)</strong><br />
	So goes the platform of the new Dutch political party, &#8220;Charity, Freedom, Diversity&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/comment-page-1/#comment-51299</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 13:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/#comment-51299</guid>
		<description>The agency amended the rule a year later to allow some visits under certain conditions, including one that the intended visitor had not been a victim of the offender.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The agency amended the rule a year later to allow some visits under certain conditions, including one that the intended visitor had not been a victim of the offender.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoosierev</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/comment-page-1/#comment-51300</link>
		<dc:creator>hoosierev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 13:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/#comment-51300</guid>
		<description>This post hits very close to home. My brother messed up and had sex with an underage neighbor and served his time in Indiana. I visited him many times. There was always ample supervision and the thought he might try something with his own children is preposterous. Does it happen? Occasionally I am sure. But the policy is a classic case of overreacting. The solution is to beef up security, not deny inmates the opportunity to see their own kids once in awhile.

	I am normally against the ACLU, I have this blog on my blogroll. But this time they were right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post hits very close to home. My brother messed up and had sex with an underage neighbor and served his time in Indiana. I visited him many times. There was always ample supervision and the thought he might try something with his own children is preposterous. Does it happen? Occasionally I am sure. But the policy is a classic case of overreacting. The solution is to beef up security, not deny inmates the opportunity to see their own kids once in awhile.</p>
<p>	I am normally against the ACLU, I have this blog on my blogroll. But this time they were right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donkey Cons</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/comment-page-1/#comment-51301</link>
		<dc:creator>Donkey Cons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 08:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/#comment-51301</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Your Kids: &#039;The Next Sexual Frontier&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;
	Levine is a member of the National Coalition Against Censorship&#039;s (NCAC) Sex and Censorship Committee, and thanks the NCAC officials in her acknowledgement, in the same place she thanks &quot;Larry Stanley&quot; -- a/k/a &quot;N.S. Aristoff,&quot; a/k/a &quot;L.A. Stanam...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Your Kids: &#8216;The Next Sexual Frontier&#8221;</strong><br />
	Levine is a member of the National Coalition Against Censorship&#8217;s (NCAC) Sex and Censorship Committee, and thanks the NCAC officials in her acknowledgement, in the same place she thanks &#8220;Larry Stanley&#8221; &#8212; a/k/a &#8220;N.S. Aristoff,&#8221; a/k/a &#8220;L.A. Stanam&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Thinking</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/comment-page-1/#comment-51302</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Thinking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 01:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/#comment-51302</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ACLU Disappointed Pedophiles Can&#039;t Get Conjugal Visits&lt;/strong&gt;
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU If you are a pedophile, the ACLU is looking out for you. The argument is old hat for the ACLU, who believe not only that pedophiles and sex offenders should have the right to live...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ACLU Disappointed Pedophiles Can&#8217;t Get Conjugal Visits</strong><br />
	Crossposted from Stop The ACLU If you are a pedophile, the ACLU is looking out for you. The argument is old hat for the ACLU, who believe not only that pedophiles and sex offenders should have the right to live&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Crab Boulevard &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; Another Sign</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/comment-page-1/#comment-51303</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Crab Boulevard &#38;#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#38;#187; Another Sign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 01:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/30/us-supreme-court-refuses-to-hear-sex-offender-visitation-case-aclu-disappointed/#comment-51303</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: And the champions of truth, justice and the American way (cough)&#38;nbsp;at the ACLU just lost a biggie. The Supreme Court has decided that convicted&#38;nbsp;pedophiles do not have the right to visits from children while in prison. Perhaps the ACLU would be more comfortable in the Netherlands. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: And the champions of truth, justice and the American way (cough)&#38;#38;nbsp;at the ACLU just lost a biggie. The Supreme Court has decided that convicted&#38;#38;nbsp;pedophiles do not have the right to visits from children while in prison. Perhaps the ACLU would be more comfortable in the Netherlands. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
