Comments on: Scalia Warns of Judicial Aristocracy http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/ Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer Thu, 11 Mar 2010 04:29:35 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2 hourly 1 By: Josiah Project » Stop the ACLU http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/comment-page-1/#comment-50047 Josiah Project » Stop the ACLU Tue, 05 Sep 2006 16:24:52 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/#comment-50047 [...] The reaction from ACLU-types will predictably be something like: “What is right and Constitutional is not always popular.” Easy answer: What the ACLU does is invent rights and distort the Constitution, which is why the ACLU is so UNpopular. The ACLU has used dubious interpretations of law NEVER imagined by our Founders with compliance from radical judges to push an agenda abhorrent to most Americans and indeed to the intent of the Constitution. Look no further than the ACLU’s pro bono defense of a website that advocates pedophilia and instructs its visitors in how to rape children and evade prosecution. So…the ACLU considers encouraging instruction on how to commit and get away with child rape a First Amendment right…does anyone believe that the Founders would agree? Therefore, can’t we conclude that if the ACLU is so wrong on this, that it may be wrong on many other things? Judge the evidence for yourself. This has been a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please email Jay or Gribbit. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 200 blogs already on-board.   [...] [...] The reaction from ACLU-types will predictably be something like: “What is right and Constitutional is not always popular.” Easy answer: What the ACLU does is invent rights and distort the Constitution, which is why the ACLU is so UNpopular. The ACLU has used dubious interpretations of law NEVER imagined by our Founders with compliance from radical judges to push an agenda abhorrent to most Americans and indeed to the intent of the Constitution. Look no further than the ACLU’s pro bono defense of a website that advocates pedophilia and instructs its visitors in how to rape children and evade prosecution. So…the ACLU considers encouraging instruction on how to commit and get away with child rape a First Amendment right…does anyone believe that the Founders would agree? Therefore, can’t we conclude that if the ACLU is so wrong on this, that it may be wrong on many other things? Judge the evidence for yourself. This has been a production of Stop The ACLU Blogburst. If you would like to join us, please email Jay or Gribbit. You will be added to our mailing list and blogroll. Over 200 blogs already on-board.   [...]

]]> By: FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blog » Stop the ACLU Blogburst Watch: The ACLU vs. America — The Numbers Don’t Lie http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/comment-page-1/#comment-50048 FullosseousFlap’s Dental Blog » Stop the ACLU Blogburst Watch: The ACLU vs. America — The Numbers Don’t Lie Fri, 01 Sep 2006 01:34:18 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/#comment-50048 [...] The reaction from ACLU-types will predictably be something like: “What is right and Constitutional is not always popular.” Easy answer: What the ACLU does is invent rights and distort the Constitution, which is why the ACLU is so UNpopular. The ACLU has used dubious interpretations of law NEVER imagined by our Founders with compliance from radical judges to push an agenda abhorrent to most Americans and indeed to the intent of the Constitution. Look no further than the ACLU’s pro bono defense of a website that advocates pedophilia and instructs its visitors in how to rape children and evade prosecution. So…the ACLU considers encouraging instruction on how to commit and get away with child rape a First Amendment right…does anyone believe that the Founders would agree? Therefore, can’t we conclude that if the ACLU is so wrong on this, that it may be wrong on many other things? Judge the evidence for yourself. [...] [...] The reaction from ACLU-types will predictably be something like: “What is right and Constitutional is not always popular.” Easy answer: What the ACLU does is invent rights and distort the Constitution, which is why the ACLU is so UNpopular. The ACLU has used dubious interpretations of law NEVER imagined by our Founders with compliance from radical judges to push an agenda abhorrent to most Americans and indeed to the intent of the Constitution. Look no further than the ACLU’s pro bono defense of a website that advocates pedophilia and instructs its visitors in how to rape children and evade prosecution. So…the ACLU considers encouraging instruction on how to commit and get away with child rape a First Amendment right…does anyone believe that the Founders would agree? Therefore, can’t we conclude that if the ACLU is so wrong on this, that it may be wrong on many other things? Judge the evidence for yourself. [...]

]]> By: California Conservative » ACLU Vs. America http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/comment-page-1/#comment-50049 California Conservative » ACLU Vs. America Fri, 01 Sep 2006 01:00:14 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/#comment-50049 [...] The reaction from ACLU-types will predictably be something like: “What is right and Constitutional is not always popular.” Easy answer: What the ACLU does is invent rights and distort the Constitution, which is why the ACLU is so UNpopular. The ACLU has used dubious interpretations of law NEVER imagined by our Founders with compliance from radical judges to push an agenda abhorrent to most Americans and indeed to the intent of the Constitution. Look no further than the ACLU’s pro bono defense of a website that advocates pedophilia and instructs its visitors in how to rape children and evade prosecution. So…the ACLU considers encouraging instruction on how to commit and get away with child rape a First Amendment right…does anyone believe that the Founders would agree? Therefore, can’t we conclude that if the ACLU is so wrong on this, that it may be wrong on many other things? Judge the evidence for yourself. [...] [...] The reaction from ACLU-types will predictably be something like: “What is right and Constitutional is not always popular.” Easy answer: What the ACLU does is invent rights and distort the Constitution, which is why the ACLU is so UNpopular. The ACLU has used dubious interpretations of law NEVER imagined by our Founders with compliance from radical judges to push an agenda abhorrent to most Americans and indeed to the intent of the Constitution. Look no further than the ACLU’s pro bono defense of a website that advocates pedophilia and instructs its visitors in how to rape children and evade prosecution. So…the ACLU considers encouraging instruction on how to commit and get away with child rape a First Amendment right…does anyone believe that the Founders would agree? Therefore, can’t we conclude that if the ACLU is so wrong on this, that it may be wrong on many other things? Judge the evidence for yourself. [...]

]]> By: Stop the ACLU Blogburst: 8/31/06 The Numbers Don’t Lie « Daily Inklings http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/comment-page-1/#comment-50050 Stop the ACLU Blogburst: 8/31/06 The Numbers Don’t Lie « Daily Inklings Thu, 31 Aug 2006 22:59:57 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/#comment-50050 [...] The reaction from ACLU-types will predictably be something like: “What is right and Constitutional is not always popular.” Easy answer: What the ACLU does is invent rights and distort the Constitution, which is why the ACLU is so UNpopular. The ACLU has used dubious interpretations of law NEVER imagined by our Founders with compliance from radical judges to push an agenda abhorrent to most Americans and indeed to the intent of the Constitution. Look no further than the ACLU’s pro bono defense of a website that advocates pedophilia and instructs its visitors in how to rape children and evade prosecution. So…the ACLU considers encouraging instruction on how to commit and get away with child rape a First Amendment right…does anyone believe that the Founders would agree? Therefore, can’t we conclude that if the ACLU is so wrong on this, that it may be wrong on many other things? Judge the evidence for yourself. [...] [...] The reaction from ACLU-types will predictably be something like: “What is right and Constitutional is not always popular.” Easy answer: What the ACLU does is invent rights and distort the Constitution, which is why the ACLU is so UNpopular. The ACLU has used dubious interpretations of law NEVER imagined by our Founders with compliance from radical judges to push an agenda abhorrent to most Americans and indeed to the intent of the Constitution. Look no further than the ACLU’s pro bono defense of a website that advocates pedophilia and instructs its visitors in how to rape children and evade prosecution. So…the ACLU considers encouraging instruction on how to commit and get away with child rape a First Amendment right…does anyone believe that the Founders would agree? Therefore, can’t we conclude that if the ACLU is so wrong on this, that it may be wrong on many other things? Judge the evidence for yourself. [...]

]]> By: Conservative Thinking http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/comment-page-1/#comment-50051 Conservative Thinking Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:28:39 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/#comment-50051 <strong>ACLU Against The Grain</strong> Crossposted from Stop The ACLU The ACLU thinks that parents have no right to know if their pregnant underage daughter is seeking an abortion. vs. America 80% of Americans think that parents have the right to know if their minor... ACLU Against The Grain
Crossposted from Stop The ACLU The ACLU thinks that parents have no right to know if their pregnant underage daughter is seeking an abortion. vs. America 80% of Americans think that parents have the right to know if their minor…

]]> By: Peter Porcupine http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/comment-page-1/#comment-50046 Peter Porcupine Sat, 06 May 2006 15:05:03 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/#comment-50046 Jay - you missed one legislative accompishment on your list, and it's particularly relevant to women's rights. The Right to Vote. It took the suffragettes almost 40 years, but they slowly convinced the American public that they should have the right to vote, and once it had been legislated - by males! - it was never questioned again. Just like the judical shortcut of Roe v. Wade has never CEASED to be questioned. Don't forget, I'm from Massachusetts, home of the only gay marriage in the nation - decided by our Supreme Court after our Democrat Legislature DELIBERATELY shortcircuited a vote on the issue. Guess how I feel about judicial activism? I am only worried that its apparent success in Mass. will spread this poison elsewhere. And what liberals don't get is what will they do, after validating judicaial superiority, when CONSERVATIVE judges are on the bench? Jay – you missed one legislative accompishment on your list, and it’s particularly relevant to women’s rights. The Right to Vote.

It took the suffragettes almost 40 years, but they slowly convinced the American public that they should have the right to vote, and once it had been legislated – by males! – it was never questioned again.

Just like the judical shortcut of Roe v. Wade has never CEASED to be questioned.

Don’t forget, I’m from Massachusetts, home of the only gay marriage in the nation – decided by our Supreme Court after our Democrat Legislature DELIBERATELY shortcircuited a vote on the issue.

Guess how I feel about judicial activism?

I am only worried that its apparent success in Mass. will spread this poison elsewhere.

And what liberals don’t get is what will they do, after validating judicaial superiority, when CONSERVATIVE judges are on the bench?

]]> By: The one with a brain http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/comment-page-1/#comment-50045 The one with a brain Sat, 06 May 2006 11:23:38 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/#comment-50045 "Scalia, viewed as one of the most conservative members of the high court, criticized Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court opinion that upheld abortion rights, saying it failed to arrive at a decision about when life begins." Scalia apparently slept through every biology class he ever attended; even if he didn't, his rabid Bible-smacking has obliterated any semblance of objectivity on his part when it comes to pseudo-religious issues such as abortion. No scientist on the planet will claim that there's a precise point at which life begins; sometimes, as with one species evolving into one or more others, a continuum is the best we can do. If modern medicine can't pin down the exact moment when a mass of viable glop finds itself alive, why should the SCOTUS be expected to do so? “Scalia, viewed as one of the most conservative members of the high court, criticized Roe v. Wade, the 1973 Supreme Court opinion that upheld abortion rights, saying it failed to arrive at a decision about when life begins.”

Scalia apparently slept through every biology class he ever attended; even if he didn’t, his rabid Bible-smacking has obliterated any semblance of objectivity on his part when it comes to pseudo-religious issues such as abortion. No scientist on the planet will claim that there’s a precise point at which life begins; sometimes, as with one species evolving into one or more others, a continuum is the best we can do. If modern medicine can’t pin down the exact moment when a mass of viable glop finds itself alive, why should the SCOTUS be expected to do so?

]]> By: loboinok http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/comment-page-1/#comment-50044 loboinok Thu, 04 May 2006 22:08:30 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/#comment-50044 Excellent post Jay! Excellent post Jay!

]]> By: Ogre http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/comment-page-1/#comment-50043 Ogre Thu, 04 May 2006 17:56:52 +0000 http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/05/04/scalia-warns-of-judicial-aristocracy/#comment-50043 Well said. Indeed the judiciary is supposed to be the weakest branch -- but that battle's been going on for over 100 years now... Well said. Indeed the judiciary is supposed to be the weakest branch — but that battle’s been going on for over 100 years now…

]]>