<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9th Circuit Court: First Amendment Doesn&#8217;t Apply To Anti-Gay Message In Schools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/</link>
	<description>Beating Them With Their Own Sickle And Hammer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: apostle</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-49527</link>
		<dc:creator>apostle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 02:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/#comment-49527</guid>
		<description>&quot;You are bantering with “The one with a brain” who has yet to find their “Haldol” and still fancies themselves a “Beaming Visionary”.&quot;

	Give he/she credit Lobo. They don&#039;t give up easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You are bantering with “The one with a brain” who has yet to find their “Haldol” and still fancies themselves a “Beaming Visionary”.&#8221;</p>
<p>	Give he/she credit Lobo. They don&#8217;t give up easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apostle</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-49528</link>
		<dc:creator>apostle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2006 02:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/#comment-49528</guid>
		<description>The One With The Brain: Holding a Pro-God rally is just as much an issue of free speech as it is free exercise of religion. If the gays did not have an agenda, there wouldn&#039;t be pro-gay rallies. In any event, whether Christian or no, anti-gay t-shirts are just as Constitutional as pro-gay t-shirts. One does not have to be a Christian to be anti-queer. There is no right to not be offended in our Constitution. You&#039;ll have to show me in our law where some groups have free speech and some don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The One With The Brain: Holding a Pro-God rally is just as much an issue of free speech as it is free exercise of religion. If the gays did not have an agenda, there wouldn&#8217;t be pro-gay rallies. In any event, whether Christian or no, anti-gay t-shirts are just as Constitutional as pro-gay t-shirts. One does not have to be a Christian to be anti-queer. There is no right to not be offended in our Constitution. You&#8217;ll have to show me in our law where some groups have free speech and some don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gitardood</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-49553</link>
		<dc:creator>gitardood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 22:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/#comment-49553</guid>
		<description>LOL It&#039;s all in good fun.    :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL It&#8217;s all in good fun.    <img src='http://www.stoptheaclu.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: loboinok</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-49552</link>
		<dc:creator>loboinok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 21:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/#comment-49552</guid>
		<description>gitardood,

	You are bantering with &quot;The one with a brain&quot; who has yet to find their &quot;Haldol&quot; and still fancies themselves a &quot;Beaming Visionary&quot;.

	He/she did remember to refrain from profanity however... I&#039;m impressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gitardood,</p>
<p>	You are bantering with &#8220;The one with a brain&#8221; who has yet to find their &#8220;Haldol&#8221; and still fancies themselves a &#8220;Beaming Visionary&#8221;.</p>
<p>	He/she did remember to refrain from profanity however&#8230; I&#8217;m impressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gitardood</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-49551</link>
		<dc:creator>gitardood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 15:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/#comment-49551</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;ALL they want is EQUAL RIGHTS.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
	We don&#039;t disagree here.
	&lt;blockquote&gt;Keep pretending that your desires (obliterate queerdom) mesg ...&lt;/blockquote&gt;
	I never said let&#039;s obliterate anything. sheesh. Just because I don&#039;t agree with it and want to keep gay marches from happening at public schools, doesn&#039;t mean that I want to &quot;obliterate&quot; gay people. &lt;i&gt;(and yes, english major, I used two negatives, sue me)&lt;/i&gt;.
	&lt;blockquote&gt;I’ll accept Jeebus as my lord and savior when the temperatue in Hades drops below 32 degrees Farhenheit.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
	And I&#039;ll accept that homosexuallity is normal, or natural, when they start handing out bibles in hell.
	&lt;blockquote&gt;I guess all of these Christians have an agenda everyone else need fear and try to suppress? Mudbrain.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
	Yes. It&#039;s called being saved. You should try it sometime. It takes angry little boys, like you, and makes them happy. ;-)
	&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.365gay.com/newscon05/01/012705dna.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Funny thing: Gays aren’t the ones running around claiming that their DNA is solely responsible for their sexuality.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
	&lt;blockquote&gt;On the other hand, ALL of Christianity is predicated on a myth.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
	That, my friend, is why they call it &quot;faith&quot;.
	&lt;blockquote&gt;the difference between the possessive “your” and the contraction “you’re.” Then you can think about ditching the training wheels.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
	&quot;You&#039;re&quot; correct. I was in a hurry to get to work... Sorry I didn&#039;t use &quot;grammer check&quot;. I love training wheels....  :-)

	I agree that we disagree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>ALL they want is EQUAL RIGHTS.</p></blockquote>
<p>	We don&#8217;t disagree here.</p>
<blockquote><p>Keep pretending that your desires (obliterate queerdom) mesg &#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>	I never said let&#8217;s obliterate anything. sheesh. Just because I don&#8217;t agree with it and want to keep gay marches from happening at public schools, doesn&#8217;t mean that I want to &#8220;obliterate&#8221; gay people. <i>(and yes, english major, I used two negatives, sue me)</i>.</p>
<blockquote><p>I’ll accept Jeebus as my lord and savior when the temperatue in Hades drops below 32 degrees Farhenheit.</p></blockquote>
<p>	And I&#8217;ll accept that homosexuallity is normal, or natural, when they start handing out bibles in hell.</p>
<blockquote><p>I guess all of these Christians have an agenda everyone else need fear and try to suppress? Mudbrain.</p></blockquote>
<p>	Yes. It&#8217;s called being saved. You should try it sometime. It takes angry little boys, like you, and makes them happy. <img src='http://www.stoptheaclu.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.365gay.com/newscon05/01/012705dna.htm" rel="nofollow">Funny thing: Gays aren’t the ones running around claiming that their DNA is solely responsible for their sexuality.</a></p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>On the other hand, ALL of Christianity is predicated on a myth.</p></blockquote>
<p>	That, my friend, is why they call it &#8220;faith&#8221;.</p>
<blockquote><p>the difference between the possessive “your” and the contraction “you’re.” Then you can think about ditching the training wheels.</p></blockquote>
<p>	&#8220;You&#8217;re&#8221; correct. I was in a hurry to get to work&#8230; Sorry I didn&#8217;t use &#8220;grammer check&#8221;. I love training wheels&#8230;.  <img src='http://www.stoptheaclu.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>	I agree that we disagree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The one with a brain</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-49550</link>
		<dc:creator>The one with a brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 05:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/#comment-49550</guid>
		<description>&quot;So what you’re saying is you wouldn’t disagree with me “mocking” a pro-gay rally?&quot;

	Go ahead and mock the rally, but bear in mind that you&#039;re comparing apples to ornages. Certain types of Christians are known for doggedly trying to convert people to their world view (ever heard the term &quot;evangelical&quot;?); gays have no such aims. And not only are Christians famous for attempting to control the private lives of others, but they do this on the basis of an assortment of unqualified fables. Give me one instance of gay people trying to use the goverment to control the behavior of straights or people who otherwise don&#039;t share their point of view. ALL they want is EQUAL RIGHTS. What are you so afraid of, Bible-boy?

	Your bigotry and basic lack of cognitive candlepower guarantees that all of the foregoing and its immutable truth will sail clean over (or through) your head, but no matter. Keep pretending that your desires (obliterate queerdom) mesg cleanly with reality so as to minimize cognitive dissonance.

	&quot;That’s what it seems [that gays are a race], when those of you on the left cry discrimination on behalf of homosexuals.&quot;

	So you admit it, then. I guess Christians are a separate race too? Where does that leave gay Christians? Can they just choose?

	You might want to mix in an anthropology course sometime. By the way, I&#039;ve never voted Democrat in my life.)

	&quot;...apparently you’re afraid of Christianity. Watch out or you might be converted to Christianity… Yeah you’re right there’s no agenda.&quot;

	I&#039;ll accept Jeebus as my lord and savior when the temperatue in Hades drops below 32 degrees Farhenheit. See, I have this thing -- I prefer my idols and heroes to be alive. Makes conversation easier.

	&quot;...“no agenda” homosexuals all wore rainbow colored leis , just to make sure that everyone knew they were gay families, at the Whitehouse for the annual easter egg roll.&quot;

	They did? The horrors! I bet everyone was traumatized.

	You honestly think gays wearing something that proclaims their identity constitutes an &quot;agenda&quot;? Well, I guess on this blog we can just define words however we like; it just requires reaching a certain distance up our own posteriors. Neat!

	I see a ton of &quot;Jesus Saves!&quot; bumper stickers and their relatives. I guess all of these Christians have an agenda everyone else need fear and try to suppress? Mudbrain.

	&quot;Blah blah blah...&quot;

	Actually, this is eerily similar to how your entire post reads.

	&quot;So you won’t mind us denying the twisted will - based on the “gay gene” superstition - of homosexuals on an entire nation. I’m the hypocrite?
	Your pathetic.&quot;

	Funny thing: Gays aren&#039;t the ones running around claiming that their DNA is solely responsible for their sexuality. Fact it, be it through nature or nurture, some people are queer. Root causes don&#039;t matter.

	On the other hand, ALL of Christianity is predicated on a myth. No Adam and Eve, no original sin, no need for salvation, no need for Jesus, no Resurrection, no End Times, boom.

	In other words, your attempt to create an analogy was a dismal failure.

	&quot;...I’m sure by this little conversation with you, or lack of, I can slam you on any issue.&quot;

	I hate chat-room speak, but when I read this it was a bona fide LOL moment. Friend, start by learning the difference between the possessive &quot;your&quot; and the contraction &quot;you&#039;re.&quot; Then you can think about ditching the training wheels.

	And I&#039;m no troll. I&#039;ve spoken to the issues here. It would be frighteningly easy to troll the place, but would a simple muckraker waste so much verbiage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So what you’re saying is you wouldn’t disagree with me “mocking” a pro-gay rally?&#8221;</p>
<p>	Go ahead and mock the rally, but bear in mind that you&#8217;re comparing apples to ornages. Certain types of Christians are known for doggedly trying to convert people to their world view (ever heard the term &#8220;evangelical&#8221;?); gays have no such aims. And not only are Christians famous for attempting to control the private lives of others, but they do this on the basis of an assortment of unqualified fables. Give me one instance of gay people trying to use the goverment to control the behavior of straights or people who otherwise don&#8217;t share their point of view. ALL they want is EQUAL RIGHTS. What are you so afraid of, Bible-boy?</p>
<p>	Your bigotry and basic lack of cognitive candlepower guarantees that all of the foregoing and its immutable truth will sail clean over (or through) your head, but no matter. Keep pretending that your desires (obliterate queerdom) mesg cleanly with reality so as to minimize cognitive dissonance.</p>
<p>	&#8220;That’s what it seems [that gays are a race], when those of you on the left cry discrimination on behalf of homosexuals.&#8221;</p>
<p>	So you admit it, then. I guess Christians are a separate race too? Where does that leave gay Christians? Can they just choose?</p>
<p>	You might want to mix in an anthropology course sometime. By the way, I&#8217;ve never voted Democrat in my life.)</p>
<p>	&#8220;&#8230;apparently you’re afraid of Christianity. Watch out or you might be converted to Christianity… Yeah you’re right there’s no agenda.&#8221;</p>
<p>	I&#8217;ll accept Jeebus as my lord and savior when the temperatue in Hades drops below 32 degrees Farhenheit. See, I have this thing &#8212; I prefer my idols and heroes to be alive. Makes conversation easier.</p>
<p>	&#8220;&#8230;“no agenda” homosexuals all wore rainbow colored leis , just to make sure that everyone knew they were gay families, at the Whitehouse for the annual easter egg roll.&#8221;</p>
<p>	They did? The horrors! I bet everyone was traumatized.</p>
<p>	You honestly think gays wearing something that proclaims their identity constitutes an &#8220;agenda&#8221;? Well, I guess on this blog we can just define words however we like; it just requires reaching a certain distance up our own posteriors. Neat!</p>
<p>	I see a ton of &#8220;Jesus Saves!&#8221; bumper stickers and their relatives. I guess all of these Christians have an agenda everyone else need fear and try to suppress? Mudbrain.</p>
<p>	&#8220;Blah blah blah&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>	Actually, this is eerily similar to how your entire post reads.</p>
<p>	&#8220;So you won’t mind us denying the twisted will &#8211; based on the “gay gene” superstition &#8211; of homosexuals on an entire nation. I’m the hypocrite?<br />
	Your pathetic.&#8221;</p>
<p>	Funny thing: Gays aren&#8217;t the ones running around claiming that their DNA is solely responsible for their sexuality. Fact it, be it through nature or nurture, some people are queer. Root causes don&#8217;t matter.</p>
<p>	On the other hand, ALL of Christianity is predicated on a myth. No Adam and Eve, no original sin, no need for salvation, no need for Jesus, no Resurrection, no End Times, boom.</p>
<p>	In other words, your attempt to create an analogy was a dismal failure.</p>
<p>	&#8220;&#8230;I’m sure by this little conversation with you, or lack of, I can slam you on any issue.&#8221;</p>
<p>	I hate chat-room speak, but when I read this it was a bona fide LOL moment. Friend, start by learning the difference between the possessive &#8220;your&#8221; and the contraction &#8220;you&#8217;re.&#8221; Then you can think about ditching the training wheels.</p>
<p>	And I&#8217;m no troll. I&#8217;ve spoken to the issues here. It would be frighteningly easy to troll the place, but would a simple muckraker waste so much verbiage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CaptainRational</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-49549</link>
		<dc:creator>CaptainRational</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 01:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/#comment-49549</guid>
		<description>I finally found out what this gay agenda is all about. Here ya go: http://www.commonplacebook.com/humor/gay/agenda.shtm

	&quot;Gay agenda&quot; has become one of my favorite phrases of late. I&#039;ve said it before, and I&#039;ll say it again: How dare homosexuals try to acquire the same rights that we straight people enjoy! What do they think this is, America?

	(Shameless self-promotion: I recently drew up a list of phrases that need to be banned from political discussion, and naturally &quot;gay agenda&quot; is on the list. You can visit my blog to see the whole thing, and please add to it! Together, we can make this a more pleasant community.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally found out what this gay agenda is all about. Here ya go: <a href="http://www.commonplacebook.com/humor/gay/agenda.shtm" rel="nofollow">http://www.commonplacebook.com/humor/gay/agenda.shtm</a></p>
<p>	&#8220;Gay agenda&#8221; has become one of my favorite phrases of late. I&#8217;ve said it before, and I&#8217;ll say it again: How dare homosexuals try to acquire the same rights that we straight people enjoy! What do they think this is, America?</p>
<p>	(Shameless self-promotion: I recently drew up a list of phrases that need to be banned from political discussion, and naturally &#8220;gay agenda&#8221; is on the list. You can visit my blog to see the whole thing, and please add to it! Together, we can make this a more pleasant community.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gfactor</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-49548</link>
		<dc:creator>gfactor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/#comment-49548</guid>
		<description>&quot;That’s what it seems, when those of you on the left cry discrimination on behalf of homosexuals.&quot;

	Why? discrimination isn&#039;t just on the basis of race. Lots of people exclude on other bases.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That’s what it seems, when those of you on the left cry discrimination on behalf of homosexuals.&#8221;</p>
<p>	Why? discrimination isn&#8217;t just on the basis of race. Lots of people exclude on other bases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gitardood</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-49547</link>
		<dc:creator>gitardood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/#comment-49547</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;...(and such a thing wouldn’t bother me; I might skip it or mock it, but wouldn’t be whining about my rights being violated.)&lt;/blockquote&gt;
	So what you&#039;re saying is you wouldn&#039;t disagree with me &quot;mocking&quot; a pro-gay rally? Most people that have your views on the issue would consider that a bad thing.

	&lt;blockquote&gt;So now homosexuals constitute a distinct race? &lt;/blockquote&gt;
	That&#039;s what it seems, when those of you on the left cry discrimination on behalf of homosexuals.

	&lt;blockquote&gt;A gay agenda, eh? Do tell. I’m not gay, so maybe I’m uninformed about this agenda — should I fear conversion to their “race”?&lt;/blockquote&gt;
	No. But apparently you&#039;re afraid of Christianity. Watch out or you might be converted to Christianity... Yeah you&#039;re right there&#039;s no agenda.

	That&#039;s why &quot;no agenda&quot; homosexuals &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/04/14/MNG0FI96PP1.DTL&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;all wore rainbow colored leis &lt;/a&gt;, just to make sure that everyone knew they were gay families, at the Whitehouse for the annual easter egg roll.

	Not to mention the fact that they used their kids to push their &quot;agenda&quot; further by having them wear the leis. So if you don&#039;t see the agenda that&#039;s your problem.

	&lt;blockquote&gt;And does this agenda hold a candle to the thoroughly evil fundagelical agenda...&lt;/blockquote&gt;
	Blah blah blah... Evil shmeeevil ... You angry liberals will say anything to avoid being morally responsible.
	&lt;blockquote&gt;...eradicate abortion ...challenging the right to die.....&lt;/blockquote&gt;
	What is evil about that? More medical research? Sure I agree with you on that.

	&lt;blockquote&gt;News flash: Denying a group the right to impose its twisted will — one based on ancient superstition — on an entire nation is not persecution or marginalization. Watching fifth-degree hypocrites like you milk victimhood for all it’s worth is plain pathetic.
	&lt;/blockquote&gt;
	So you won&#039;t mind us denying the twisted will - based on the &quot;gay gene&quot; superstition - of homosexuals on an entire nation. I&#039;m the hypocrite?
	Your pathetic.
	As far as sticking to my guitar and not politics, I plan on playing guitar for 20 more years and I&#039;m sure by this little conversation with you, or lack of, I can slam you on any issue. Trolls like you are just a pain that we live with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;(and such a thing wouldn’t bother me; I might skip it or mock it, but wouldn’t be whining about my rights being violated.)</p></blockquote>
<p>	So what you&#8217;re saying is you wouldn&#8217;t disagree with me &#8220;mocking&#8221; a pro-gay rally? Most people that have your views on the issue would consider that a bad thing.</p>
<blockquote><p>So now homosexuals constitute a distinct race? </p></blockquote>
<p>	That&#8217;s what it seems, when those of you on the left cry discrimination on behalf of homosexuals.</p>
<blockquote><p>A gay agenda, eh? Do tell. I’m not gay, so maybe I’m uninformed about this agenda — should I fear conversion to their “race”?</p></blockquote>
<p>	No. But apparently you&#8217;re afraid of Christianity. Watch out or you might be converted to Christianity&#8230; Yeah you&#8217;re right there&#8217;s no agenda.</p>
<p>	That&#8217;s why &#8220;no agenda&#8221; homosexuals <a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/04/14/MNG0FI96PP1.DTL" rel="nofollow">all wore rainbow colored leis </a>, just to make sure that everyone knew they were gay families, at the Whitehouse for the annual easter egg roll.</p>
<p>	Not to mention the fact that they used their kids to push their &#8220;agenda&#8221; further by having them wear the leis. So if you don&#8217;t see the agenda that&#8217;s your problem.</p>
<blockquote><p>And does this agenda hold a candle to the thoroughly evil fundagelical agenda&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>	Blah blah blah&#8230; Evil shmeeevil &#8230; You angry liberals will say anything to avoid being morally responsible.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;eradicate abortion &#8230;challenging the right to die&#8230;..</p></blockquote>
<p>	What is evil about that? More medical research? Sure I agree with you on that.</p>
<blockquote><p>News flash: Denying a group the right to impose its twisted will — one based on ancient superstition — on an entire nation is not persecution or marginalization. Watching fifth-degree hypocrites like you milk victimhood for all it’s worth is plain pathetic.
	</p></blockquote>
<p>	So you won&#8217;t mind us denying the twisted will &#8211; based on the &#8220;gay gene&#8221; superstition &#8211; of homosexuals on an entire nation. I&#8217;m the hypocrite?<br />
	Your pathetic.<br />
	As far as sticking to my guitar and not politics, I plan on playing guitar for 20 more years and I&#8217;m sure by this little conversation with you, or lack of, I can slam you on any issue. Trolls like you are just a pain that we live with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RanbaRal</title>
		<link>http://www.stoptheaclu.com/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/comment-page-1/#comment-49546</link>
		<dc:creator>RanbaRal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2006 21:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://stoptheaclu.dreamhosters.com/archives/2006/04/20/9th-circuit-court-first-amendment-doesnt-apply-to-anti-gay-message-in-schools/#comment-49546</guid>
		<description>The One With A Brain

	&quot;A gay agenda, eh? Do tell.&quot;

	How about the fact that EVERY group has an agenda?  Every agenda promotes theirs to the detriment of some others.  The equality agenda is even detrimental and unequal-- to those who believe in an inequality agenda.  Is one more &#039;correct&#039; than the other?  Popular opinion says equality is the riteous path, but that too is nothing more than a moral judgement call.

	I&#039;ve got no problems with gays who just are.  I don&#039;t agree with the actions of homosexuals, but that&#039;s their perogative, not mine.  My problem is with the very vocal &quot;you will ACCEPT what I do and LIKE it&quot; crowd that annoys me.  I personally do not like being told what to think.  I say &quot;I will accept what you do but do not like it.&quot;

	This somehow makes me a dangerous evil biggot out to kill all homosexuals in the popular minds of those vocal on the &#039;left&#039; side of the issue.  Apparently that I find the killing of anyone over a social issue such as this to be abhorrent is &quot;just windowdressing&quot; to try to hide some latent fear of homosexuals and a case of closet homosexuality and self-loathing for it.  While I cannot say that is the view of all those on the left, that has just been my experience with what they will usually resort to in conversations I have had in the past.

	You say thank God scripture cannot be quoted by a student in school.  I say thank God the Christians don&#039;t control the school policy, but damn the people who supress their voices.  How is one to explain their moral judgement calls if they are not allowed to speak of the source of said call?  As a Christian turned Athiest turned Christian again I can say that there is a certain level of persecution against Christian ideology in the public realm.  I honestly think it stems from hundreds of years of Christians supressing others.  People collectively remember that and as such try to supress those views out of fear it will happen again by even permitting it in the public realm.  Just because they did it in the past does not justify doing it to them presently and in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The One With A Brain</p>
<p>	&#8220;A gay agenda, eh? Do tell.&#8221;</p>
<p>	How about the fact that EVERY group has an agenda?  Every agenda promotes theirs to the detriment of some others.  The equality agenda is even detrimental and unequal&#8211; to those who believe in an inequality agenda.  Is one more &#8216;correct&#8217; than the other?  Popular opinion says equality is the riteous path, but that too is nothing more than a moral judgement call.</p>
<p>	I&#8217;ve got no problems with gays who just are.  I don&#8217;t agree with the actions of homosexuals, but that&#8217;s their perogative, not mine.  My problem is with the very vocal &#8220;you will ACCEPT what I do and LIKE it&#8221; crowd that annoys me.  I personally do not like being told what to think.  I say &#8220;I will accept what you do but do not like it.&#8221;</p>
<p>	This somehow makes me a dangerous evil biggot out to kill all homosexuals in the popular minds of those vocal on the &#8216;left&#8217; side of the issue.  Apparently that I find the killing of anyone over a social issue such as this to be abhorrent is &#8220;just windowdressing&#8221; to try to hide some latent fear of homosexuals and a case of closet homosexuality and self-loathing for it.  While I cannot say that is the view of all those on the left, that has just been my experience with what they will usually resort to in conversations I have had in the past.</p>
<p>	You say thank God scripture cannot be quoted by a student in school.  I say thank God the Christians don&#8217;t control the school policy, but damn the people who supress their voices.  How is one to explain their moral judgement calls if they are not allowed to speak of the source of said call?  As a Christian turned Athiest turned Christian again I can say that there is a certain level of persecution against Christian ideology in the public realm.  I honestly think it stems from hundreds of years of Christians supressing others.  People collectively remember that and as such try to supress those views out of fear it will happen again by even permitting it in the public realm.  Just because they did it in the past does not justify doing it to them presently and in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

